The effect of flow regulation on the distribution and dynamics of channel geomorphic units (CGUs) and implications for Marble Trout (Salmo marmoratus) spawning habitat in the Soča River, Slovenia

A river channel survey was completed along three reaches (totalling 14.3km), i.e. an unregulated stretch and two regulated reaches (with reduced flows) of the Soca River to assess the spatial pattern of CGU type, size, hydraulics and distribution. In addition, one regulated reach was re-surveyed at different discharges to investigate the dynamics of CGUs and their relationship with flow. CGUs were classified and mapped using visual assessment and physical measurements of the hydraulic characteristics (velocity and depth) in each CGU. The effect of flow regulation on the hydraulic character of the river becomes apparent by highlighting differences in the types of CGUs present between the regulated and unregulated reaches. Reduced flows from river regulation also significantly reduces the size of CGUs, alters their hydraulic character, and affects the longitudinal distribution of types by creating greater habitat fragmentation. Hydraulic preferences for spawning habitat of marble trout (Salmo marmoratus) were obtained from previous research. The hydraulic character of CGUs were analysed at different discharges and combined with the hydraulic preferences of the species to evaluate the impact of flow regulation on habitat availability. Analysis shows that intermediate measured flow provides increased spawning habitat availability in the chosen reach for this target species.

[1]  P. Armitage,et al.  Assessing stream quality using information on mesohabitat distribution and character , 2000 .

[2]  Michael Negnevitsky,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems , 2001 .

[3]  K. Fausch,et al.  Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes , 2002 .

[4]  Michael K. Young,et al.  A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features , 1993 .

[5]  J. Wiens.  Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[6]  J. Heino,et al.  Identifying the scales of variability in stream macroinvertebrate abundance, functional composition and assemblage structure , 2004 .

[7]  J. Mount,et al.  The influence of relative sediment supply on riverine habitat heterogeneity , 2006 .

[8]  Michael Church,et al.  Channel units in small, high gradient streams on Vancouver Island, British Columbia , 2002 .

[9]  Ian Maddock,et al.  The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health , 1999 .

[10]  G. Crosa,et al.  Habitat suitability curves for brown trout (Salmo trutta fario L.) in the River Adda, Northern Italy: comparing univariate and multivariate approaches , 2001 .

[11]  Piotr Parasiewicz,et al.  MesoHABSIM: A concept for application of instream flow models in river restoration planning , 2001 .

[12]  M. Newson,et al.  Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges , 2000 .

[13]  I. Maddock,et al.  Reallocation of compensation releases to restore river flows and improve instream habitat availability in the Upper Derwent Catchment, Derbyshire, UK , 2001 .

[14]  Ken D. Bovee,et al.  A guide to stream habitat analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. IFIP No. 12 , 1982 .

[15]  R. A. Wadeson,et al.  A GEOMORPHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF INSTREAM FLOW ENVIRONMENTS , 1994 .

[16]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable? , 1996 .