An internet-based survey method for college student drinking research.

The purpose of this study was to describe and assess the utility of an Internet-based survey method for characterizing the alcohol consumption of college students. After extensive pilot research, a random sample of 1910 students aged 16-29 years was invited to complete a questionnaire, consisting of a series of web-pages linked to a relational database on a secure web-site. A branch structure allowed for tailoring of survey items by age and gender. The students received up to nine contacts, including a pre-notice letter with a token gift and an e-mail invitation (Phase 1), a reminder letter and e-mail message (Phase 2), and then telephone reminders and replacement access codes (Phase 3). Non-computer-users were offered a pen-and-paper alternative, making this a mixed-mode survey. The overall response to the survey was 82% (n = 1564). The median completion time was 16.7 min. Participants' comments showed high levels of satisfaction with the survey. Comparison of web (n = 1501) versus pen-and-paper completions (n = 63) revealed no modality effects. Technical problems addressed during the course of implementation included web-browser-operating system incompatibilities, and periodic network errors, although these resulted in little lost participation. Internet-based surveys are feasible for college student research and with carefully managed recruitment, can yield a high response.

[1]  M. Pledger,et al.  Survey data need not underestimate alcohol consumption. , 2002, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[2]  A. Sporle,et al.  Adolescents' perceptions of a health survey using multimedia computer‐assisted self‐administered interview , 2001, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[3]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Assessment of nonresponse bias in an internet survey of alcohol use. , 2004, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[4]  J. Orford,et al.  University student drinking: the role of motivational and social factors , 2004 .

[5]  M. Couper A REVIEW OF ISSUES AND APPROACHES , 2000 .

[6]  Steve Jones The Internet Goes to College: How Students Are Living in the Future with Today's Technology. , 2002 .

[7]  J. Langley,et al.  Secondhand effects of alcohol use among university students: computerised survey , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  M. Clarke,et al.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[10]  H. Wechsler,et al.  Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college. A national survey of students at 140 campuses. , 1994, JAMA.

[11]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Acceptability of various brief intervention approaches for hazardous drinking among university students. , 2003, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[12]  Tim Stockwell,et al.  INTERNATIONAL GUIDE FOR MONITORING ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION AND RELATED HARM , 2000 .

[13]  S. M. Rogers,et al.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. , 1998, Science.

[14]  F. Collins Centre for Addiction and Mental Health , 2004 .

[15]  Jane Metrik,et al.  Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods? , 2002, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[16]  H. Perkins Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement.

[17]  R. Caetano Non-response in alcohol and drug surveys: a research topic in need of further attention. , 2001, Addiction.

[18]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  High prevalence, persistent hazardous drinking among New Zealand tertiary students. , 2002, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[19]  H. Wechsler,et al.  Trends in College Binge Drinking During a Period of Increased Prevention Efforts: Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study Surveys: 1993–2001 , 2002, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[20]  G. Dowdall Health and Behavioral Consequences of Binge Drinking in College and Too Many Colleges are Still in Denial about Alcohol Abuse , 1995 .

[21]  William C. Schmidt,et al.  World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions , 1997 .

[22]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[23]  J. Langley,et al.  Interpretation of items in the AUDIT questionnaire. , 2002, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[24]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Perceived social norms and their relation to university student drinking. , 2003, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[25]  M. Larimer,et al.  Approaches to brief intervention for hazardous drinking in young people. , 2004, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[26]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[27]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Incentives to increase participation in an Internet survey of alcohol use: a controlled experiment. , 2003, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[28]  H A Skinner,et al.  Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[29]  Mick P Couper,et al.  Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol.