The technical, neurological and psychological significance of ‘alpha’, ‘delta’ and ‘theta’ waves confounded in EEG evoked potentials: a study of peak latencies

It is suggested that lack of progress in understanding the neurological and psychological significance of EEG averaged evoked potentials (AEPs) and event related potentials (ERPs) may be due to the confounding of, 'delta', 'theta' and 'alpha' frequency responses generated by the 'brain-stem' 'limbic' and 'thalamic' cortical activating systems, respectively. This hypothesis was tested in a sample of 93 adults by recording EEG responses to auditory tones and using narrow-band filters to distinguish '4 Hz', '7 Hz', and '10 Hz' component waves in the unfiltered AEP. Bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses of peak latencies provided evidence of the distinct and unitary nature of these component waves and demonstrated their relative influence on the P1, N1 and P2 peaks of the unfiltered AEP. The results also reveal a predicted negative relationship between the 10 and 4 Hz latencies which is attributed to inhibition of the delta frequency brain-stem ascending reticular activating system (BSARAS) by the alpha frequency diffuse thalamic projection system (DTPS). Correlations of the 4 Hz latencies, with age, sex, and behavioural arousal variables confirm that the 4 Hz latencies are associated with the maintenance of behavioural arousal, an important function of the BSARAS.

[1]  D. Regan.  Evoked Potentials in Psychology, Sensory Physiology and Clinical Medicine , 1972 .

[2]  John Madden,et al.  Neurobiology of learning, emotion, and affect , 1991 .

[3]  G A Miller,et al.  Digital filtering: background and tutorial for psychophysiologists. , 1992, Psychophysiology.

[4]  A. Gale.  Electroencephalographic studies of extraversion-introversion: a case study in the psychophysiology of individual differences , 1983 .

[5]  D. Robinson,et al.  Evoked potential augmenting and reducing: the methodological and theoretical significance of new electrophysiological observations. , 1984, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Brain, Mind, and Behavior: A New Perspective on Human Nature , 1996 .

[7]  D L Robinson,et al.  An analysis of human EEG responses in the alpha range of frequencies. , 1983, The International journal of neuroscience.

[8]  R. Stelmack.  Biological bases of extraversion: psychophysiological evidence. , 1990, Journal of personality.

[9]  D. Robinson.  The neurophysiological bases of high IQ. , 1989, The International journal of neuroscience.

[10]  W. Walter.  The Living Brain , 1963 .

[11]  D. Robinson.  The EEG and intelligence: An appraisal of methods and theories , 1993 .

[12]  D. Robinson.  Properties of the diffuse thalamocortical system and human personality: A direct test of Pavlovian/Eysenckian theory , 1982 .

[13]  D. Robinson.  Age differences, cerebral arousability, and human intelligence , 1997 .

[14]  J. Davis.  Organ Physiology Structure and Function of the Nervous System , 1977 .

[15]  W. Walter,et al.  COMPARISON OF SUBCORTICAL, CORTICAL AND SCALP ACTIVITY USING CHRONICALLY INDWELLING ELECTRODES IN MAN. , 1965, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  D. Robinson.  Sex differences in brain activity, personality and intelligence: a test of arousability theory , 1998 .

[17]  M Rappaport,et al.  Peak identification in visual evoked potentials. , 1973, Psychophysiology.

[18]  I SAMUELS,et al.  Reticular mechanisms and behavior. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.