The relativistic redshift with 3×10−17 uncertainty at NIST, Boulder, Colorado, USA

We have estimated the relativistic redshift correction due to gravity, necessary to reference to the geoid the measurements of the new frequency standards at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colorado, USA, using a new local survey and various methods and models. We referenced the frequency offsets computed from different methods to the same geoid surface, one defined with respect to the current best estimate of an ideal mean-Earth ellipsoid. The new fractional frequency results are (1) −1797.61×10−16, based on the global gravitational model EGM96; (2a) −1798.72×10−16, based on the regional, high-resolution geoid model G96SSS; (2b) −1798.49×10−16, based on the regional, high-resolution geoid model G99SSS; and (3) −1798.91×10−16, based on the value for the geopotential number provided in the National Geodetic Survey's data sheet for the NIST reference marker. The minus sign implies that clocks run faster in the laboratory in Boulder than a standard clock located on the geoid. The values from (2b) and (3) are expected to be the most accurate and are also independent. Based on these results, we estimate the frequency shift at the reference point at NIST to be −1798.7×10−16, with an estimated standard uncertainty of ±0.3×10−16.

[1]  R. Rapp Use of potential coefficient models for geoid undulation determinations using a spherical harmonic representation of the height anomaly/geoid undulation difference , 1997 .

[2]  D. A. Smith,et al.  GEOID99 and G99SSS: 1-arc-minute geoid models for the United States , 2001 .

[3]  T.E. Parker,et al.  Assessment of GPS carrier-phase stability for time-transfer applications , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  R. Rummel,et al.  Strategies for Solving the Vertical Datum Problem Using Terrestrial and Satellite Geodetic Data , 1990 .

[5]  R. Rapp Separation between reference surfaces of selected vertical datums , 1994 .

[6]  Judah Levine,et al.  First comparison of remote cesium fountains , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Frequncy Control Symposium and PDA Exhibition (Cat. No.01CH37218).

[7]  O. Colombo Numerical Methods for Harmonic Analysis on the Sphere , 1981 .

[8]  Jim R. Ray,et al.  IGS/BIPM pilot project: GPS carrier phase for time/frequency transfer and timescale formation , 2003 .

[9]  P. Hetzel,et al.  Comparing primary frequency standards at NIST and PTB , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/EIA International Frequency Control Symposium and Exhibition (Cat. No.00CH37052).

[10]  A. Bjerhammar,et al.  On a relativistic geodesy , 1985 .

[11]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96 , 1998 .

[12]  D. A. Smith,et al.  The GEOID96 high-resolution geoid height model for the United States , 1999 .

[13]  Richard H. Rapp,et al.  The development and analysis of geopotential coefficient models to spherical harmonic degree 360 , 1990 .

[14]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Consideration of permanent tidal deformation in the orbit determination and data analysis for the Topex/Poseidon mission , 1991 .

[15]  The World of Gravity According to Rapp , 1998 .

[16]  Intercomparison and evaluation of some contemporary global geopotential models , 1999 .