Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream

Abstract Restoration of streams degraded by urbanization has usually been attempted by enhancement of instream habitat or riparian zones. Such restoration approaches are unlikely to substantially improve instream ecological condition because they do not match the scale of the degrading process. Recent studies of urban impacts on streams in Melbourne, Australia, on water chemistry, algal biomass and assemblage composition of diatoms and invertebrates, suggested that the primary degrading process to streams in many urban areas is effective imperviousness (EI), the proportion of a catchment covered by impervious surfaces directly connected to the stream by stormwater drainage pipes. The direct connection of impervious surfaces to streams means that even small rainfall events can produce sufficient surface runoff to cause frequent disturbance through regular delivery of water and pollutants; where impervious surfaces are not directly connected to streams, small rainfall events are intercepted and infiltrated. We, therefore, identified use of alternative drainage methods, which maintain a near-natural frequency of surface runoff from the catchment, as the best approach to stream restoration in urban catchments and then used models of relationships between 14 ecological indicators and EI to determine restoration objectives. Ecological condition, as indicated by concentrations of water-quality variables, algal biomass, and several measures of diatom and macroinvertebrate assemblage composition, declined with increasing EI until a threshold was reached (EI = 0.01–0.14), beyond which no further degradation was observed. We showed, in a sample catchment, that it is possible to redesign the drainage system to reduce EI to a level at which the models predict detectable improvement in most ecological indicators. Distributed, low-impact design measures are required that intercept rainfall from small events and then facilitate its infiltration, evaporation, transpiration, or storage for later in-house use.

[1]  E. Stanley,et al.  Ecological Forecasting and the Urbanization of Stream Ecosystems: Challenges for Economists, Hydrologists, Geomorphologists, and Ecologists , 2003, Ecosystems.

[2]  D. Booth,et al.  Effectiveness of large woody debris in stream rehabilitation projects in urban basins , 2001 .

[3]  J. Meyer,et al.  Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[4]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  WinBUGS user manual version 1.4 , 2003 .

[5]  N. Null Urban Stream Restoration , 2003 .

[6]  J. Toby Tourbier Open space through stormwater management: Helping to structure growth on the urban fringe , 1994 .

[7]  M. Lesperance,et al.  PIECEWISE REGRESSION: A TOOL FOR IDENTIFYING ECOLOGICAL THRESHOLDS , 2003 .

[8]  T. Wong,et al.  The planning and construction of an urban stormwater management scheme. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  C. J. Walsh Protection of in-stream biota from urban impacts: minimise catchment imperviousness or improve drainage design? , 2004 .

[10]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Bayesian inference in ecology , 2004 .

[11]  Ann Riley,et al.  Restoring streams in cities : a guide for planners, policy makers, and citizens , 1998 .

[12]  Charles F. Rabeni,et al.  Integrating biological realism into habitat restoration and conservation strategies for small streams , 1996 .

[13]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[14]  C. Walsh,et al.  A biological approach to assessing the potential success of habitat restoration in urban streams , 2001 .

[15]  P. Newall,et al.  Response of epilithic diatom assemblages to urbanization influences , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[16]  T. A. McMahon,et al.  Modelling runoff and diffuse pollution loads in urban areas , 1999 .

[17]  Christopher J. Walsh,et al.  Stormwater drainage pipes as a threat to a stream-dwelling amphipod of conservation significance, Austrogammarus australis, in southeastern Australia , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[18]  P. Groffman,et al.  N processing within geomorphic structures in urban streams , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[19]  M. Lydy,et al.  An Assessment of Water Quality, Physical Habitat, and Biological Integrity of an Urban Stream in Wichita, Kansas, Prior to Restoration Improvements (Phase I) , 2003, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[20]  G. De’ath PRINCIPAL CURVES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR INDIRECT AND DIRECT GRADIENT ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[21]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Towards a Conceptual Framework for Restoration Ecology , 1996 .

[22]  J. Meyer,et al.  Streams in the Urban Landscape , 2001 .

[23]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology , 2003 .

[24]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[25]  B. Chessman,et al.  Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: A procedure based on habitat‐specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index , 1995 .

[26]  Vancouver Island Region,et al.  MINISTRY OF WATER, LAND AND AIR PROTECTION , 2002 .

[27]  N. Grimm,et al.  N retention and transformation in urban streams , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[28]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[29]  Kenneth B. Brown,et al.  Urban Stream Restoration Practices: An Initial Assessment , 2000 .

[30]  Tim D Fletcher,et al.  The Influence of Urban Density and Drainage Infrastructure on the Concentrations and Loads of Pollutants in Small Streams , 2004, Environmental management.

[31]  Christopher J. Walsh,et al.  Urban impacts on the ecology of receiving waters: a framework for assessment, conservation and restoration , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[32]  S. Roberts,et al.  Catchment urbanisation and increased benthic algal biomass in streams: linking mechanisms to management , 2004 .

[33]  Alison H. Purcell,et al.  An Assessment of a Small Urban Stream Restoration Project in Northern California , 2002 .

[34]  Vincent H. Resh,et al.  Strawberry creek on the University of California, Berkeley campus: A case history of urban stream restoration , 1992 .

[35]  S. Bunn,et al.  Ecosystem measures of river health and their response to riparian and catchment degradation , 1999 .

[36]  C. Richards,et al.  Considerations of scale in habitat conservation and restoration , 1996 .

[37]  A. Suren,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of enhancement activities in urban streams: II. Responses of invertebrate communities , 2005 .