Analysis and interaction of exergy, environmental and economic in multi-objective optimization of BTX process based on evolutionary algorithm

In this paper sustainability analysis (exergy, environmental and economic) and multi-objective optimization for an aromatic plant are provided and interactions between decision variables are discussed. Environmental evaluation shows that the cancer human toxicity and global warming are the most important environmental concerns and the weight of EIs (environmental impacts) are mainly due to process wastes. The optimizations results demonstrate parameters like reactor temperature have a wide range in the optimizations while some variables, such as extraction unit variables have the same value. Utility EI reduction occurred in economic and exergy optimizations rather than environmental optimization so if the environmental concerns of the plant are due to utility consumption, exergy and economic optimizations reduce EI and there is no need for an explicit environmental optimization. While whenever the environmental concerns correspond to process waste, process optimization should be done based on EI itself. Furthermore multi-objective optimizations are carried out and the objectives trade-offs are illustrated through Pareto curves in four scenarios. In the proposed green scenario 3.8% of plant's EI decreases while annual cost rises up to 2%. In the proposed economic scenario annual cost reduces by 3.6% however plant's EI deteriorates up to 13.7%.

[1]  David T. Allen,et al.  Green engineering: Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes and products , 2001 .

[2]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  Pollution prevention with chemical process simulators: The generalized waste reduction (WAR) algorithm , 1997 .

[3]  David R. Shonnard and,et al.  Comparative Environmental Assessments of VOC Recovery and Recycle Design Alternatives for a Gaseous Waste Stream , 2000 .

[4]  Juan Gabriel Segovia-Hernández,et al.  Multiobjective synthesis of heat exchanger networks minimizing the total annual cost and the environmental impact , 2011 .

[5]  Farzad Abdollahi-Demneh,et al.  Calculating exergy in flowsheeting simulators: A HYSYS implementation , 2011 .

[6]  Jian Chu,et al.  Kinetic Model and Simulation Analysis for Toluene Disproportionation and C9-Aromatics Transalkylation , 2007 .

[7]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Multi-objective design optimization of a natural gas-combined cycle with carbon dioxide capture in a life cycle perspective , 2010 .

[8]  Chunshan Li,et al.  Environmentally conscious design of chemical processes and products: Multi-optimization method , 2009 .

[9]  G. J. McRae,et al.  ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS CHEMICAL PROCESS DESIGN , 1998 .

[10]  Liselotte Schebek,et al.  Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems , 2009 .

[11]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Multi-objective exergy-based optimization of a polygeneration energy system using an evolutionary algorithm , 2012 .

[12]  Tatiana Morosuk,et al.  Environmental evaluation of a power plant using conventional and advanced exergy-based methods☆ , 2012 .

[13]  W. Carter,et al.  Computer modeling study of incremental hydrocarbon reactivity , 1989 .

[14]  Ali Behbahaninia,et al.  Thermoeconomic optimization and exergy analysis of CO 2/NH 3 cascade refrigeration systems , 2011 .

[15]  Adam P. Simpson,et al.  The utility of environmental exergy analysis for decision making in energy , 2013 .

[16]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective o , 2011 .

[17]  Karina A. Ojeda,et al.  Sustainable ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass Application of exergy analysis , 2011 .

[18]  Hsuan Chang,et al.  A new exergy method for process analysis and optimization , 2005 .

[19]  Fontina Petrakopoulou,et al.  Environmental and thermodynamic evaluation of CO2 capture, transport and storage with and without enhanced resource recovery , 2013 .

[20]  César R. Chamorro,et al.  World geothermal power production status: Energy, environmental and economic study of high enthalpy technologies , 2012 .

[21]  David T. Allen,et al.  Green engineering : environmentally conscious design of chemical processes/ [by] David T. Allen and David R. Shonnard , 2001 .

[22]  Bingjian Zhang,et al.  Energy-use analysis and evaluation of distillation systems through avoidable exergy destruction and investment costs , 2012 .

[23]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products : guide and backgrounds (Part 1) , 1992 .

[24]  Jim Petrie,et al.  Process synthesis and optimisation tools for environmental design: methodology and structure , 2000 .

[25]  Álvaro Restrepo,et al.  Exergetic and environmental analysis of a pulverized coal power plant , 2012 .

[26]  Hosein Taghdisian,et al.  An optimization‐oriented green design for methanol plants , 2012 .

[27]  Li Sun,et al.  A Strategy for Multi-objective Optimization under Uncertainty in Chemical Process Design , 2008 .

[28]  Tatiana Morosuk,et al.  Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production , 2011 .

[29]  Jinsheng Sun,et al.  Energy and exergy analysis of a five-column methanol distillation scheme , 2012 .

[30]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  An update of the Human Toxicity Potential with special consideration of conventional air pollutants , 2006 .

[31]  George G. Dimopoulos,et al.  Exergy analysis and optimisation of a steam methane pre-reforming system , 2013 .

[32]  Ajit Kumar Kolar,et al.  3‐E analysis of advanced power plants based on high ash coal , 2010 .

[33]  Karen High,et al.  Process enhancement through waste minimization and multiobjective optimization , 2012 .

[34]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle assessment and multiobjective optimisation , 1999 .

[35]  Jonathan M. Harris Basic Principles of Sustainable Development , 2000 .