Optimization of methanol synthesis and cyclohexane dehydrogenation in a thermally coupled reactor using differential evolution (DE) method

This paper presents a study on optimization of a methanol synthesis and cyclohexane dehydrogenation in a thermally coupled reactor. A theoretical investigation has been performed in order to evaluate the optimal operating conditions and enhancement of methanol and benzene production in a thermally coupled reactor. Coupling energy intensive endothermic reaction systems with suitable exothermic reactions improves the thermal efficiency of processes and reduces the size of the reactors. In this work, the catalytic methanol synthesis is coupled with the catalytic dehydrogenation of cyclohexane to benzene in a heat exchanger reactor formed of two fixed beds separated by a wall, where heat is transferred across the surface of tube. A steady-state heterogeneous model of the two fixed beds predicts the performance of this novel configuration. The co-current mode is investigated and the optimization results are compared with corresponding predictions for a conventional (industrial) methanol fixed bed reactor operated at the same feed conditions. The differential evolution (DE), an exceptionally simple evolution strategy, is applied to optimize methanol and benzene synthesis coupled reactor considering methanol and benzene mole fractions as the main objectives. The simulation results have been shown that there are optimum values of initial molar flow rate of endothermic stream and inlet temperature of exothermic and endothermic sides to maximize the objective function. The optimization method has enhanced the methanol mole fraction by 3.67%. The results suggest that optimal coupling of these reactions could be feasible and beneficial. Experimental proof-of-concept is needed to establish the validity and safe operation of the novel reactor.

[1]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Multiobjective differential evolution (MODE) for optimization of adiabatic styrene reactor , 2005 .

[2]  David W. Agar.  Multifunctional reactors: Old preconceptions and new dimensions , 1999 .

[3]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  Operability of an industrial methanol synthesis reactor with mixtures of fresh and partially deactivated catalyst , 2005 .

[4]  Lawrence. Davis,et al.  Handbook Of Genetic Algorithms , 1990 .

[5]  C. Fukuhara,et al.  Performance simulation of a wall-type reactor in which exothermic and endothermic reactions proceed simultaneously, comparing with that of a fixed-bed reactor , 2005 .

[6]  E. Dieterich,et al.  Kinetic investigations of the deactivation by coking of a noble metal catalyst in the catalytic hydrogenation of nitrobenzene using a catalytic wall reactor , 1999 .

[7]  Jerzy Skrzypek,et al.  Theoretical analysis of two parallel and consecutive reactions in isothermal symmetrical catalyst pellets using the dusty-gas model , 1984 .

[8]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Recuperative coupling of exothermic and endothermic reactions , 2006 .

[9]  A simplified procedure for the optimal design of autothermal reactors for endothermic high-temperature reactions , 2001 .

[10]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  A comparison of auto-thermal and conventional methanol synthesis reactor in the presence of catalyst deactivation , 2008 .

[11]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Modified differential evolution (MDE) for optimization of non-linear chemical processes , 2006, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[12]  K. Sotowa,et al.  Modeling of an FAU-type zeolite membrane reactor for the catalytic dehydrogenation of cyclohexane , 2004 .

[13]  B. Babu,et al.  Estimation of heat transfer parameters in a trickle-bed reactor using differential evolution and orthogonal collocation , 1999 .

[14]  B. Babu,et al.  Optimization of process synthesis and design problems: A modified differential evolution approach , 2006 .

[15]  John R. Grace,et al.  Modeling of a novel membrane reactor to integrate dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene with hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline , 2008 .

[16]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[17]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  Theoretical investigation of a Pd-membrane reactor for methanol synthesis , 2003 .

[18]  Majid Baniadam,et al.  Incorporation of Flexibility in the Design of a Methanol Synthesis Loop in the Presence of Catalyst Deactivation , 2003 .

[19]  Mohammad Reza Rahimpour,et al.  Selective kinetic deactivation model for methanol synthesis from simultaneous reaction of CO2 and CO with H2 on a commercial copper/zinc oxide catalyst , 1998 .

[20]  Aacm Beenackers,et al.  Intra-particle diffusion limitations in low-pressure methanol synthesis , 1990 .

[21]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Differential evolution strategies for optimal design of shell-and-tube heat exchangers , 2007 .

[22]  Mohammad Reza Rahimpour,et al.  A comparison of co-current and counter-current modes of operation for a dual-type industrial methanol reactor , 2008 .

[23]  Feng-Sheng Wang,et al.  Hybrid method of evolutionary algorithms for static and dynamic optimization problems with application to a fed-batch fermentation process , 1999 .

[24]  Lynn F. Gladden,et al.  Modelling diffusion and reaction accompanied by capillary condensation using three-dimensional pore networks. Part 2. Dusty gas model and general reaction kinetics , 2002 .

[25]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[26]  A. Beenackers,et al.  Mathematical modeling of internal mass transport limitations in methanol synthesis , 2000 .

[27]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  Enhancement of Methanol Production in a Membrane Dual‐Type Reactor , 2007 .

[28]  N. Papayannakos,et al.  Mathematical modelling of the performance of non-isothermal membrane reactors , 1997 .

[29]  Gerhart Eigenberger,et al.  Efficient reactor concepts for coupling of endothermic and exothermic reactions , 2002 .

[30]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[31]  Gerhart Eigenberger,et al.  A new reactor concept for endothermic high-temperature reactions , 1999 .

[32]  Naotsugu Itoh,et al.  An adiabatic type of palladium membrane reactor for coupling endothermic and exothermic reactions , 1997 .

[33]  J. M. Smith.  Chemical Engineering Kinetics , 1980 .

[34]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  A comparison of homogeneous and heterogeneous dynamic models for industrial methanol reactors in the presence of catalyst deactivation , 2005 .

[35]  M. Fowler,et al.  Performance comparison of Fick’s, dusty-gas and Stefan–Maxwell models to predict the concentration overpotential of a SOFC anode , 2003 .

[36]  Asterios Gavriilidis,et al.  Catalytic combustion assisted methane steam reforming in a catalytic plate reactor , 2003 .

[37]  R. Jackson,et al.  Transport in porous catalysts , 1977 .

[38]  F. Dautzenberg,et al.  Process intensification using multifunctional reactors , 2001 .

[39]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Coupling exothermic and endothermic reactions in adiabatic reactors , 2008 .

[40]  K. Sotowa,et al.  Catalytic dehydrogenation of cyclohexane in an FAU-type zeolite membrane reactor , 2003 .

[41]  Reza Eslamloueyan,et al.  Optimal temperature profile in methanol synthesis reactor , 2002 .

[42]  G. Froment,et al.  Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design , 1979 .

[43]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Numerical Optimization of Computer Models , 1982 .

[44]  Antonello Barresi,et al.  Methanol synthesis in a forced unsteady-state reactor network , 2002 .

[45]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems , 1984 .

[46]  N. Itoh,et al.  A membrane reactor using palladium , 1987 .

[47]  T. Moustafa.  Simultaneous production of styrene and cyclohexane in an integrated membrane reactor , 2000 .

[48]  Said S.E.H. Elnashaie,et al.  Modeling and basic characteristics of novel integrated dehydrogenation — hydrogenation membrane catalytic reactors , 2000 .

[49]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  Co‐current and Countercurrent Configurations for a Membrane Dual Type Methanol Reactor , 2008 .

[50]  Alexander L. Lindsay,et al.  Thermal Conductivity of Gas Mixtures , 1950 .