Evaluation of streamflow simulation by SWAT model for two small watersheds under snowmelt and rainfall

Abstract The degradation of the river water quality in Canadian rural catchments is of concern. In these catchments, the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model can help better understand the problems related to diffuse pollution. The numerous documented applications of SWAT have been dominated by areas uniquely driven by rainfall. Given that Canadian hydroclimatic conditions differ due to the presence of a seasonal snowpack of long duration, evaluation of the hydrological performance needs to be performed prior to attempting any water quality simulations. The objective of the present work is to evaluate the hydrological behaviour of the SWAT model under snowmelt and rainfall for two small watersheds located in southeastern Canada. Different calibration schemes are evaluated including seasonal effects. One-year calibration gave satisfactory daily performances measured with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NS) ranging between 61 and 83% and deviations of volume (Dv ) between −10 and 1%, while in validation, NS was 40–73% and Dv between −20 and −3%. The SWAT model has difficulties in reconciling both seasons. When winter and summer data are used separately to calibrate the model, the model performance is still much better for the winter season than for the summer one. However, the latter is considerably improved when only summer observations are provided for calibration. Conversely, calibration based strictly on the winter observations provides no real advantage over that based on all available data. A two-step composite calibration, which optimizes the SWAT snow accumulation and melt-related parameters on the winter data, after all other model parameters have been optimized on the summer data, provides a compromise.

[1]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .

[2]  D. Schindler,et al.  A review of anthropogenic sources of nitrogen and their effects on Canadian aquatic ecosystems , 2006 .

[3]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Rainfall-runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments , 2004 .

[4]  J. Hamlett,et al.  Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils , 1998 .

[5]  Jan Seibert,et al.  Reliability of Model Predictions Outside Calibration Conditions , 2003 .

[6]  R. Ferguson,et al.  Snowmelt runoff models , 1999 .

[7]  Xuesong Zhang,et al.  Runoff Simulation of the Headwaters of the Yellow River Using The SWAT Model With Three Snowmelt Algorithms 1 , 2008 .

[8]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[9]  A. S. Hamilton,et al.  ESTIMATING WINTER STREAMFLOW USING CONCEPTUAL STREAMFLOW MODEL , 2000 .

[10]  E. Anderson,et al.  A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover , 1975 .

[11]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[12]  Paulin Coulibaly,et al.  Wavelet Analysis of the Interannual Variability in Southern Quebec Streamflow , 2004 .

[13]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Operational Testing of Hydrological Simulation Models , 2022 .

[14]  Apurva Gollamudi,et al.  Hydrological and water quality modeling of agricultural fields in Quebec , 2006 .

[15]  A. Jamieson,et al.  Phosphorus losses in surface and subsurface runoff from a snowmelt event on an agricultural field in Quebec , 2003 .

[16]  Paula Jo Lemonds,et al.  Modeling Hydrology in a Small Rocky Mountain Watershed Serving Large Urban Populations 1 , 2007 .

[17]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[18]  J. Arnold,et al.  Development of a snowfall-snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT) , 2002 .

[19]  Anne-Catherine Favre,et al.  Estimation des débits sous glace dans le sud du Québec : comparaison de modèles neuronal et déterministe , 2005 .

[20]  Dapei Wang,et al.  Measurement of Flow under Ice Covers in North America , 1997 .

[21]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[22]  Stephen R. Workman,et al.  STATISTICAL PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING DAILY AND MONTHLY HYDROLOGIC MODEL PREDICTIONS , 2004 .

[23]  Annie Poulin,et al.  Selecting a calculation method to estimate sediment and nutrient loads in streams: Application to the Beaurivage River (Quebec, Canada) , 2005 .

[24]  John R. Williams,et al.  Flood Routing With Variable Travel Time or Variable Storage Coefficients , 1969 .

[25]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[26]  Assefa M. Melesse,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE SWAT MODEL'S SNOWMELT HYDROLOGY IN A NORTHWESTERN MINNESOTA WATERSHED , 2005 .

[27]  F E Hicks,et al.  Index velocity methods for winter discharge measurement , 2004 .

[28]  F. Bonn,et al.  SWAT-predicted influence of different landscape and cropping system alterations on phosphorus mobility within the Pike River watershed of south-western Québec , 2007 .