Nurture affects gender differences in spatial abilities

Women remain significantly underrepresented in the science, engineering, and technology workforce. Some have argued that spatial ability differences, which represent the most persistent gender differences in the cognitive literature, are partly responsible for this gap. The underlying forces at work shaping the observed spatial ability differences revolve naturally around the relative roles of nature and nurture. Although these forces remain among the most hotly debated in all of the sciences, the evidence for nurture is tenuous, because it is difficult to compare gender differences among biologically similar groups with distinct nurture. In this study, we use a large-scale incentivized experiment with nearly 1,300 participants to show that the gender gap in spatial abilities, measured by time to solve a puzzle, disappears when we move from a patrilineal society to an adjoining matrilineal society. We also show that about one-third of the effect can be explained by differences in education. Given that none of our participants have experience with puzzle solving and that villagers from both societies have the same means of subsistence and shared genetic background, we argue that these results show the role of nurture in the gender gap in cognitive abilities.

[1]  N. Newcombe,et al.  The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis , 1989 .

[2]  J. List,et al.  Do Women Supply More Public Goods Than Men?: Preliminary Experimental Evidence from Matrilineal and Patriarchal Societies , 2008 .

[3]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[4]  Donna J. Nelson,et al.  A NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIVERSITY IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FACULTIES AT RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES , 2005 .

[5]  G. Stanley,et al.  A factorial and predictive study of spatial abilities , 1972 .

[6]  A. K. Roychoudhury.  Genetic relationships of the populations in eastern India. , 1992, Annals of human biology.

[7]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[9]  S. Sorby.  Educational Research in Developing 3‐D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students , 2009 .

[10]  Ben A. Barres,et al.  Does gender matter? , 2006, Nature.

[11]  L G Humphreys,et al.  Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  null null,et al.  Land of Plenty: Diversity as America's Competitive Edge In Science, Engineering, And Technology , 2001 .

[13]  Christina W. Stage.  Gender Differences in Test Results , 1988 .

[14]  J. Berry.  Temne and Eskimo perceptual skills. , 1966 .

[15]  D. Halpern.  Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[16]  Lawrence H. Summers,et al.  Remarks at NBER Conference on Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce , 2005 .

[17]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[18]  J. List,et al.  Gender Differences in Competition: Evidence from a Matrilineal and a Patriarchal Society , 2008 .

[19]  H. Nordvik,et al.  Gender Differences in Spatial Abilities and Spatial Activity Among University Students in an Egalitarian Educational System , 1998 .