Identification of Fugitive Dust Generation, Transport, and Deposition Areas Using Remote Sensing

Fugitive (or airborne) dust is a primary cause of decreased air quality, as well as being a potential health hazard. Urban and agricultural areas are of particular interest as fugitive dust sources because of their potential for releases during soil disturbance, ongoing industrial and commercial processes, and agricultural activities. Typical strategies for assessing and monitoring fugitive dust source areas include numerical modeling of atmospheric circulation patterns, field assessments, and collection of dust samples using various methods. Analysis of remotely sensed multi-spectral data provides another alternative for identifying fugitive dust source, transport, and sink areas. Multi-spectral (visible to shortwave infrared) data acquired by the Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) instrument on board the Landsat 7 satellite is used to perform land-cover classifications for the Nogales, AZ, region. Data acquired during the winter of 2000 and the summer of 2001 are used to assess seasonal variations and detect land-cover changes of significance to dust-transport processes. An expert system approach using spectral, textural, and vegetation abundance data is used to classify the ETM+ data into land-cover types important to dust-transport models. The determined overall accuracy of the land-cover classifications is 74 percent. These results can be used to identify (and calculate areal percentages of) fugitive dust source, transport, and sink regions. This spatially explicit, digital data product is useful both as an input into dust-transport models and as a check on the results of such models.

[1]  P. Longley,et al.  Remote Sensing and Urban Analysis , 2001 .

[2]  Guobin Zhu,et al.  Classification using ASTER data and SVM algorithms;: The case study of Beer Sheva, Israel , 2002 .

[3]  M. Ridd.  Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities , 1995 .

[4]  Richard D. Scheffe,et al.  A review of the development and application of the urban airshed model , 1993 .

[5]  James R. Irons,et al.  Texture transforms of remote sensing data , 1981 .

[6]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Integrating Contextual Information with per-Pixel Classification for Improved Land Cover Classification , 2000 .

[7]  C. Pieters,et al.  Remote geochemical analysis : elemental and mineralogical composition , 1993 .

[8]  R. Slatt,et al.  Desert Dust: Characteristics and rates of deposition in central Arizona , 1981 .

[9]  S. Ventura,et al.  THE INTEGRATION OF GEOGRAPHIC DATA WITH REMOTELY SENSED IMAGERY TO IMPROVE CLASSIFICATION IN AN URBAN AREA , 1995 .

[10]  E. Brown,et al.  Effect of Aggregates on Performance of Bituminous Concrete , 1989 .

[11]  M. U. Beg,et al.  Responses of alveolar macrophages to post-Gulf-War airborne dust from Kuwait , 1998 .

[12]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Monitoring urban land cover change: An expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers , 2001 .

[13]  F. Sabins.  Remote Sensing: Principles and Interpretation , 1987 .

[14]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity , 2001 .

[15]  John E. Estes,et al.  Studying the Earth's Vegetation from Space , 1984 .

[16]  Glen R. Cass,et al.  Allergens in paved road dust and airborne particles , 1999 .

[17]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part II: Preliminary Model Validation , 2001 .

[18]  P. Gong,et al.  Application of satellite and GIS technologies for land-cover and land-use mapping at the rural-urban fringe : A case study , 1992 .

[19]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[20]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Estimation of sub-pixel land cover composition in the presence of untrained classes , 2000 .

[21]  P. Gong,et al.  The use of structural information for improving land-cover classification accuracies at the rural-urban fringe. , 1990 .

[22]  M. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Personal exposure to dust, endotoxin and crystalline silica in California agriculture. , 1999, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[23]  M. Abrams.  The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER): Data products for the high spatial resolution imager on NASA's Terra platform , 2000 .

[24]  Terry L. Sohl,et al.  Regional characterization of land cover using multiple sources of data , 1998 .

[25]  A. Huete.  A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[26]  J. L. Sánchez,et al.  Platinum and rhodium distribution in airborne particulate matter and road dust. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  A. Danin,et al.  Trapping of airborne dust by Eig's meadowgrass (Poa eigii) in the Judean Desert, Israel , 1997 .

[28]  R. Fenske,et al.  Pesticides in household dust and soil: exposure pathways for children of agricultural families. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[29]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  PM10 source apportionment in California's San Joaquin valley , 1992 .