Non-adherence to recommendations for further testing after outpatient CT and MRI.

BACKGROUND Nearly 1 in every 5 outpatient visits ends with a request for a diagnostic imaging test, and imaging reports often contain recommendations for further testing. Little is known about adherence to recommendations for further testing after outpatient computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study linking provincial administrative data to a cross-sectional audit of 23,691 outpatient CT and MRI scans performed in 2005 in Ontario, Canada. After excluding patients who died (n=1031), were hospitalized (n=3030), or visited an emergency department (n=3660) within 180 days of the index CT/MRI scan, 15,970 CT/MRI scans were included. The primary outcome was adherence to recommendations for further testing within 180 days of an index CT/MRI scan. RESULTS Further testing was recommended in 2027 of 15,970 (12.7%) index CT/MRI scan reports and was recommended most frequently after CT chest scans (593 of 2276 [26.1%]). From the 2027 scans in which further testing was recommended, we identified 2102 individual recommendations for a specific type of follow-up test and found that just over one third (37.6%) of these recommendations were followed at 180 days. Adherence was lower (32.3%) when patients had a visit to the referring physician within 180 days of the index CT/MRI scan, compared with when they had no such visit (50.5%; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS Radiologists commonly recommend further testing after outpatient CT and MRI scanning. However, nearly two thirds of these recommendations are not followed. This suggests that substantial opportunities exist to improve the exchange of information between clinicians and radiologists and to advance the quality of outpatient care.

[1]  E. Halm,et al.  Factors Associated with Time to Follow-up of Severe Hyperkalemia in the Ambulatory Setting , 2007, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[2]  Jeffrey L. Schnipper,et al.  Association of Communication Between Hospital-based Physicians and Primary Care Providers with Patient Outcomes , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  James P Borgstede Radiology: commodity or specialty. , 2008, Radiology.

[4]  Benjamin Littenberg,et al.  Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[5]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Attitudes of Family Physicians, Specialists and Radiologists about the Use of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ontario. , 2009, Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante.

[6]  J. Iglehart Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Curtis P Langlotz,et al.  A framework for improving radiology reporting. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[8]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[9]  B J Hillman,et al.  Radiology reporting: attitudes of referring physicians. , 1988, Radiology.

[10]  J. Iglehart,et al.  The new era of medical imaging--progress and pitfalls. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  E. Fisher,et al.  Avoiding the unintended consequences of growth in medical care: how might more be worse? , 1999, JAMA.

[12]  S. Jha Teaching residents the art of defensive radiology. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[13]  Indications for and results of outpatient computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Ontario. , 2008, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[14]  R. Anderson Billions for defense: the pervasive nature of defensive medicine. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  E. Halm,et al.  Follow-up of Markedly Elevated Serum Potassium Results in the Ambulatory Setting: Implications for Patient Safety , 2006, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[16]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[17]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  Information exchange among physicians caring for the same patient in the community , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[18]  Frank Levy Computers, conversation, utilization, and commoditization: the 2008 Herbert Abrams Lecture. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  J P Kassirer,et al.  Our stubborn quest for diagnostic certainty. A cause of excessive testing. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  G W L Boland The impact of teleradiology in the United States over the last decade: driving consolidation and commoditization of radiologists and radiology services. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[21]  William M. Sage,et al.  Defensive Medicine Among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice Environment , 2005 .

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. , 2007, JAMA.

[23]  J. Stone Incidentalomas--clinical correlation and translational science required. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J. Bruzzi The words count--radiology and medical linguistics. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.