Peripheral regulation of stiffness during arm movements by coactivation of the antagonist muscles

Two experiments investigated whether unexpected and differential loading of a rapid, unsighted arm movement resulted in the central nervous system (CNS) regulating limb stiffness by modifying the associated neuromuscular activity. In Experiment 1, subjects completed multiple, spring-loaded training trials until a prespecified criterion of learning was attained. On selected trials, the spring load was unexpectedly replaced by an inertial load. Results indicated that to maintain positional accuracy during this inertial load trial, limb stiffness was increased by coactivating the antagonist muscles, i.e. by changing the associated neuromuscular activity from a predominantly triphasic pattern to one of coactivation. In Experiment 2, the sequence of loading was reversed producing a change in the required limb stiffness from a relatively high to low level. This change was observed as a pattern of coactivation being replaced by a triphasic activity pattern. These results support the notion that limb stiffness is regulated primarily through modification of the neuromuscular activity pattern prior to movement termination. It was also demonstrated that the size of the unexpected load did not affect the basic activation pattern selected by the CNS. It is proposed that the signal which triggers the CNS to regulate limb stiffness is based on peripheral information generated as a result of agonist activity occurring during the first part of the movement.

[1]  J C Houk,et al.  Regulation of stiffness by skeletomotor reflexes. , 1979, Annual review of physiology.

[2]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Terminal Accuracy of Unexpectedly Loaded Rapid Movements , 1980 .

[3]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Neurological ballistic movements: Sampled data or intermittent open-loop control , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  J. Cooke,et al.  Responses to force perturbations preceding voluntary human arm movements , 1981, Brain Research.

[6]  R. Sperry Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  R. Simmons,et al.  Maintenance of equilibrium point control during an unexpectedly loaded rapid limb movement , 1984, Brain Research.

[8]  V Lakshminarayanan,et al.  Electromyographic evidence of neurological controller signals with viscous load. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Studies on the control of some simple motor tasks. 3. Comparison of the EMG pattern during ballistically initiated movements in man and squirrel monkey. , 1973, Brain research.

[10]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  What muscle variable(s) does the nervous system control in limb movements? , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[12]  P. N. S. Bawa,et al.  Force as the controlling muscle variable in limb movement , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  E. Holst,et al.  The behavioural physiology of animals and man : the selected papers of Erich von Holst , 1973 .

[14]  J. A. Hoffer,et al.  Central control and reflex regulation of mechanical impedance: The basis for a unified motor-control scheme , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.