Validation of mathematical models for helicopter flight simulators past, present and future challenges

At the heart of a flight simulator resides the mathematical representation of aircraft behaviour in response to control inputs, atmospheric disturbances and system inputs including failures and malfunctions. While this mathematical model can never be wholly accurate, its fidelity, in comparison with real world behaviour, underpins the usefulness of the flight simulator. The present paper examines the state of the art achieved in validating mathematical models for helicopter simulators, addressing the strengths and weaknesses of the present European standard for the qualification of helicopter flight simulators, JAR FSTD-H (previously JAR-STD-1H/2H/3H). Essential questions are examined, such as: What is the required model fidelity to guarantee a simulation is sufficiently representative to be fit for purpose? Are the tolerances set in the current standards fine enough that they lead to only minor changes in handling qualities? What is an acceptable tuning process for the simulation? What is the effect of modelling fidelity on the overall pilot control strategy? What is the relationship between the settings of the simulator cueing environment and the behaviour of the pilot? What is the industrial experience on qualification of flight simulators that might usefully inform developments? Many of these questions were addressed in Europe in a previous GARTEUR Action Group (AG) HC/AG-12 the results of which are documented in this paper. Solutions are proposed for improving the current JAR-FSTD standard with respect to validation of mathematical models.

[1]  Arthur W. Gubbels,et al.  Acceptance Testing of a Rotorcraft Flight Simulator for Research and Teaching: The Importance of Unified Metrics , 2009 .

[2]  Linghai Lu,et al.  Investigation of Rotorcraft-Pilot Couplings under Flight-Path Constraint below the Minimum-Power Speed , 2010 .

[3]  J. A. Mulder,et al.  Cybernetic Analysis of Perspective Flight-Path Display Dimensions , 2005 .

[4]  Jeffery A. Schroeder,et al.  Pilot Behavioral Observations in Motion Flight Simulation , 2010 .

[5]  Gareth D. Padfield,et al.  Measuring simulation fidelity through an adaptive pilot model , 2005 .

[6]  Gareth D. Padfield.  How do pilots know when to stop, turn or pull-up? Developing guidelines for the design of vision aids , 2003 .

[7]  R. M. Gerdes,et al.  Pilot use of simulator cues for autorotation landings , 1986 .

[8]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[9]  Frank M. Nieuwenhuizen,et al.  A New Multi-Channel Pilot Model Identification Method for Use in Assessment of Simulator Fidelity , 2006 .

[10]  J. Schroeder,et al.  AIAA 2001-4251 Effects of Visual Texture, Grids, and Platform Motion on Unpowered Helicopter Landings , 2001 .

[11]  Paul M. J. Van den Hof,et al.  Identification and control - Closed-loop issues , 1995, Autom..

[12]  S. K. Advani,et al.  Dynamic Interface Modelling and Simulation - A Unique Challenge , 2001 .

[13]  Max Mulder,et al.  A Cybernetic Approach to Assess Flight Simulator Fidelity , 2004 .

[14]  George E. Cooper,et al.  The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities , 1969 .

[15]  Arthur W. Gubbels,et al.  Progress in the development of unified fidelity metrics for rotorcraft flight simulators , 2010 .

[16]  Ronald A. Hess,et al.  Assessment of Flight Simulator Fidelity in Multiaxis Tasks Including Visual Cue Quality , 2001 .

[17]  Max Mulder,et al.  Effects of Peripheral Visual and Physical Motion Cues in Roll-Axis Tracking Tasks , 2008 .

[18]  Max Baarspul,et al.  A review of flight simulation techniques , 1990 .

[19]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  Development of a Full Flight Envelope Helicopter Simulation Using System Identification , 2007 .

[20]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Development of an Aeronautical Design Standard for Validation of Military Helicopter Simulators , 2006 .

[21]  D. Casolaro,et al.  Eurocopter experience in flight loop development for level D training simulator , 2004 .

[22]  Gareth D. Padfield,et al.  The tau of flight control , 2011, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[23]  Gareth D. Padfield,et al.  How do helicopter pilots know when to stop, turn or pull up? , 2001 .

[24]  Pavel,et al.  Helicopter safety: A contradiction in terms? - An overview of the status at the beginning of the 21st century , 2011 .

[25]  Paul M.J. Van den Hof,et al.  Closed-Loop Issues in System Identification , 1997 .

[26]  Hao,et al.  Modeling Enhancements for Physics-Based Simulation Validations , 2005 .

[27]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  System Identification Methods for Aircraft Flight Control Development and Validation , 1995 .

[28]  Peter R. Grant,et al.  Modelling Pilot Control Behaviour for Flight Simulator Design and Assessment , 2010 .

[29]  Ronald A. Hess,et al.  Closed-loop assessment of flight simulator fidelity , 1991 .

[30]  Gareth D. Padfield,et al.  Flight Simulation in Academia HELIFLIGHT in its First Year of Operation , 2001 .

[31]  W. von Grünhagen,et al.  HOST, a General Helicopter Simulation Tool for Germany and France , 2000 .

[32]  René van Paassen,et al.  Exploring the Roles of Information in the Manual Control of Vehicular Locomotion: From Kinematics and Dynamics to Cybernetics , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[33]  J A Schroeder,et al.  Evaluation of a motion fidelity criterion with visual scene changes. , 2000, Journal of aircraft.

[34]  H. C. Curtiss,et al.  On aerodynamic modelling for rotorcraft flight dynamics , 1996 .

[35]  Allison Engine Co.,et al.  FAA/JAA Harmonization of FAR 33/JAR-E Engine Certification Regulations , 1997 .

[36]  M. Hamers,et al.  Nonlinear Helicopter Model Validation Applied to Realtime Simulations. , 1997 .

[37]  G. Padfield,et al.  Optical Tau in Boundary Avoidance Tracking - A New Perspective on Pilot Induced Oscillations , 2010 .

[38]  Gareth D. Padfield,et al.  Integrating predicted and perceived fidelity for flight simulators , 2010 .

[39]  Gareth D. Padfield,et al.  Progress in Measuring Simulation Fidelity using an Adaptive Pilot Model , 2004 .