Sensitivity analysis for high-contrast imaging with segmented space telescopes

Direct imaging and spectroscopy of Earth-like planets will require high-contrast imaging at very close angular separation: 1e10 star to planet ux ratio at a few tenths of an arcsecond. Large telescopes in space are necessary to provide sufficient collecting area and angular resolution to achieve this goal. In the static case, coronagraphic instrument designs combined with wavefront control techniques have been optimized for segmented on-axis telescope geometries, but the extreme wavefront stability required at very high contrast of the order of tens of picometers remains one of the main challenges. Indeed, cophasing errors and instabilities directly contribute to the degradation of the final image contrast. A systematic understanding is therefore needed to quantify and optimize the static and dynamic constraints on segment phasing. We present an analytical model: Pair-based Analytical model for Segmented Telescopes Imaging from Space (PASTIS), which enables quasi-instantaneous analytical evaluations of the impact of segment-level aberrations and phasing on the image contrast. This model is based on a multiple sum of Young interference fringes between pairs of segments and produces short and long exposure coronagraphic images with a segmented telescope in presence of local phase aberrations on each segment. PASTIS matches end-to-end numerical simulations with high-fidelity (3% rms error on the contrast). Moreover, the model can be inverted by dint of a projection on the singular modes of the phase to provide constraints on each Zernike polynomial for each segment. These singular modes provide information on the contrast sensitivity to segment-level phasing errors in the pupil, which can be used to derive constraints on both static and dynamic mitigation strategies (e.g. backplane geometry or segment vibration sensing and control). The few most sensitive modes can be well identified and must be controlled at the level of tens of picometers, while the least sensitive modes in the hundreds of picometers. This novel formalism enables a fast and efficient sensitivity analysis for any segmented telescopes, in both static and dynamic modes.

[1]  Matthew A. Greenhouse,et al.  The JWST science instrument payload: mission context and status , 2013, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[2]  N. J. Kasdin,et al.  Optimal pupil apodizations for arbitrary apertures , 2011 .

[3]  Sascha P. Quanz,et al.  Direct detection of exoplanets in the 3–10 μm range with E-ELT/METIS , 2014, International Journal of Astrobiology.

[4]  Michael Wegner,et al.  Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , 2010 .

[5]  Michael Shao,et al.  Extreme adaptive optics for the Thirty Meter Telescope , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[6]  Pierre Baudoz,et al.  EPICS: the exoplanet imager for the E-ELT , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[7]  G. Ruane,et al.  The LUVOIR architecture "A" coronagraph instrument , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[8]  Marcel Carbillet,et al.  Analytical decomposition of Zernike and hexagonal modes over a hexagonal segmented optical aperture , 2018, OSA Continuum.

[9]  Mamadou N'Diaye,et al.  Pair-based Analytical model for Segmented Telescopes Imaging from Space (PASTIS) for sensitivity analysis , 2018, 1807.00870.

[10]  James H. Burge,et al.  Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation II , 2016 .

[11]  Mamadou N'Diaye,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for high-contrast missions with segmented telescopes , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[12]  L. Pueyo,et al.  HIGH-CONTRAST IMAGING WITH AN ARBITRARY APERTURE: ACTIVE COMPENSATION OF APERTURE DISCONTINUITIES , 2012, 1211.6112.

[13]  H. Philip Stahl,et al.  Preliminary analysis of effect of random segment errors on coronagraph performance , 2015, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[14]  S. Gezari,et al.  From Cosmic Birth to Living Earths: The Future of UVOIR Space Astronomy , 2015, 1507.04779.

[15]  Matthew A. Greenhouse The JWST science instrument payload: mission context and status , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[16]  Mark Clampin Status of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[17]  Stuart B. Shaklan,et al.  Contrast Leakage as function of Telescope Motion , 2016 .

[18]  H. Philip Stahl,et al.  Engineering specifications for large aperture UVO space telescopes derived from science requirements , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[19]  Olivier Guyon,et al.  The Habitable Exoplanet (HabEx) Imaging Mission: preliminary science drivers and technical requirements , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[20]  E. Cady,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE LYOT AND PIAA CORONAGRAPHY FOR ARBITRARILY SHAPED TELESCOPE APERTURES , 2013, 1305.6686.

[21]  Robert J. Vanderbei,et al.  Lyot coronagraph design study for large, segmented space telescope apertures , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[22]  Stuart Shaklan,et al.  Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets VIII , 2017 .

[23]  R. Soummer,et al.  APODIZED PUPIL LYOT CORONAGRAPHS FOR ARBITRARY APERTURES. IV. REDUCED INNER WORKING ANGLE AND INCREASED ROBUSTNESS TO LOW-ORDER ABERRATIONS , 2014, 1412.2751.

[24]  Paolo Conconi,et al.  Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , 2012 .

[25]  Mamadou N'Diaye,et al.  High-contrast imager for complex aperture telescopes (HiCAT): 5. first results with segmented-aperture coronagraph and wavefront control , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[26]  Marshall D. Perrin,et al.  Updated optical modeling of JWST coronagraph performance contrast, stability, and strategies , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[27]  H. Philip Stahl Advanced Mirror Technology Development (AMTD) project: overview and year four accomplishments , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[28]  Mamadou N'Diaye,et al.  Capabilities of ACAD-OSM, an active method for the correction of aperture discontinuities , 2017 .