Dynamic Response Characteristics in Variable Stiffness Soft Inflatable Links

In soft robotics, there is the fundamental need to develop devices that are flexible and can change stiffness in order to work safely in the vicinity of humans. Moreover, these structures must be rigid enough to withstand the force application and accuracy in motion. To solve these issues, previous research proposed to add a compliance element between motor and load – Series Elastic Actuators (SEAs). This approach benefits from improved force control and shock tolerance due to the elasticity introduced at joint level. However, series compliance at the joint level comes at the cost of inferior position controllability and additional mechanical complexity. In this research, we move the elastic compliance to the link, and evaluate the characteristics of variable stiffness soft inflatable links. The detailed investigation of the dynamic behaviour of inflatable link takes into consideration different internal pressures and applied loads. Our results demonstrate that the use of soft inflatable links leads to good weight lifting capability whilst preserving compliance which is beneficial for safety critical applications.

[1]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Variable Stiffness Link (VSL): Toward inherently safe robotic manipulators , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[2]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[3]  Alain Delchambre,et al.  Flexible Medical Devices: Review of Controllable Stiffness Solutions , 2017 .

[4]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  Variable Stiffness Actuators: Review on Design and Components , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[5]  広瀬 茂男,et al.  Biologically inspired robots : snake-like locomotors and manipulators , 1993 .

[6]  Mariangela Manti,et al.  Stiffening in Soft Robotics: A Review of the State of the Art , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[8]  Zhi Liu,et al.  Personalized Variable Gain Control With Tremor Attenuation for Robot Teleoperation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[9]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  A Novel Concept for Safe, Stiffness-Controllable Robot Links. , 2017, Soft robotics.

[10]  Karim Abdel-Malek,et al.  Synthesis and analysis of a flexible elephant trunk robot , 2006, Adv. Robotics.

[11]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Passivity of a class of sampled-data systems: Application to haptic interfaces , 1997 .

[12]  LipsonHod,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Design, Simulation, and Fabrication of Soft Robots , 2014 .

[13]  MajidiCarmel,et al.  Soft Robotics: A Perspective—Current Trends and Prospects for the Future , 2014 .

[14]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part III—Applications , 1985 .

[15]  Adam Morecki,et al.  Elephant trunk type elastic manipulator - a tool for bulk and liquid materials transportation , 1999, Robotica.

[16]  B Mazzolai,et al.  Design of a biomimetic robotic octopus arm , 2009, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[17]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[18]  Howie Choset,et al.  Design and architecture of a series elastic snake robot , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Tendon-Based Stiffening for a Pneumatically Actuated Soft Manipulator , 2016, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.