E-Service Quality: Development of a Hierarchical Model

Using survey data from 358 online customers, the study finds that the e-service quality construct conforms to the structure of a third-order factor model that links online service quality perceptions to distinct and actionable dimensions, including (1) website design, (2) fulfillment, (3) customer service, and (4) security/privacy. Each dimension is found to consist of several attributes that define the basis of e-service quality perceptions. A comprehensive specification of the construct, which includes attributes not covered in existing scales, is developed. The study contrasts a formative model consisting of four dimensions and sixteen attributes against a reflective conceptualization. The results of this comparison indicate that studies using an incorrectly specified model overestimate the importance of certain e-service quality attributes. Global fit criteria are also found to support the detection of measurement misspecification. Meta-analytic data from 31,264 online customers are used to show that the developed measurement predicts customer behavior better than widely used scales, such as WebQual and E-S-Qual. The results show that the new measurement enables managers to assess e-service quality more accurately and predict customer behavior more reliably.

[1]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[2]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Proportional structural effects of formative indicators , 2008 .

[3]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality , 1996 .

[4]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  M. Gilly,et al.  eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality , 2003 .

[6]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Advancing formative measurement models , 2008 .

[7]  K. Bollen.  Multiple indicators: Internal consistency or no necessary relationship? , 1984 .

[8]  Michael D. Johnson.  Consumer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable Alternatives , 1984 .

[9]  D. W. Schumann,et al.  Comparing Consumers' Recall of Prepurchase and Postpurchase Product Evaluation Experiences , 1994 .

[10]  Ahmet H. Kirca,et al.  Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Impact on Performance , 2005 .

[11]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  E-S-QUAL A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality , 2004 .

[12]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[13]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic , 2008, Psychometrika.

[14]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Hans H. Bauer,et al.  eTransQual: A Transaction Process-Based Approach for Capturing Service Quality in Online Shopping , 2006 .

[16]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[17]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Christian Brock,et al.  E-Service Quality: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2015 .

[19]  J. Edwards.  Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[20]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[21]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing , 2002 .

[22]  Carol C. Bienstock,et al.  Measuring Service Quality in E-Retailing , 2006 .

[23]  Joseph O. Rentz,et al.  A measure of service quality for retail stores: Scale development and validation , 1996 .

[24]  M. Fassnacht,et al.  Quality of Electronic Services , 2006 .

[25]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[26]  P. A. Dabholkar,et al.  A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study , 2000 .

[27]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[28]  J. J. Cronin,et al.  Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach , 2001 .

[29]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  P. Sweeney,et al.  Research Notes. Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes , 1992 .

[31]  P. Sweeney,et al.  Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. , 1992 .

[32]  R. Lusch,et al.  Getting Marketers to Invest in Firm-Specific Capital , 2007 .

[33]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[34]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[35]  Sharon E. Beatty,et al.  Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers in the Online Environment , 2008 .

[36]  K. Law,et al.  Multidimensional constructs in structural equation analysis: An illustration using the job perception and job satisfaction constructs , 1999 .

[37]  Markus Blut,et al.  Service Separation and Customer Satisfaction , 2013 .

[38]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Causal Indicator Models: Identification, Estimation, and Testing , 2009 .

[39]  C. Fornell.  A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience: , 1992 .