Views of Moroccan University Teachers on Plant Taxonomy and Its Teaching and Learning Challenges

Plant taxonomy includes the identification, description, and classification of plants at the level of species or other taxa. This study aims to analyze the views of university teachers on plant taxonomy and its teaching, the causes of the shortage of plant taxonomists, and the challenges encountered by students in learning plant taxonomy. University teachers in Morocco (n = 24) responded to a survey consisting of fixed and open-ended questions. The data was analyzed by inductive and deductive content analysis. The results showed that all university teachers considered a taxonomist as a scientist and plant taxonomy as a dynamic and highly scientific, and descriptive discipline. They stated that the taxonomist community is in crisis because of the shortage of plant taxonomists and the decrease in the quality of training provided at the university. The biggest challenges in learning plant taxonomy were the prevalence of traditional teacher-centered methods, the inadequacy of time and didactic resources spent on teaching, and the Latin nomenclature. The difficulties associated with the concept of evolution and the diversity of classifications were also mentioned. The angiosperm group was the most difficult for students to understand. Furthermore, this research shows that the financial, human, institutional, pedagogical, and didactic resources for the teaching of plant taxonomy are insufficient and do not allow for the use of teaching methods supporting learning. How to plant taxonomy is taught is important, and when it is considered difficult, it can lead to a reluctance to study plant species and be one of the reasons for the decline in plant taxonomists in Morocco. Consequently, this issue can negatively affect the preservation and conservation of local flora.

[1]  F. J. Robles-Moral,et al.  What Do Pre-Service Preschool Teachers Know about Biodiversity at the Level of Organisms? Preliminary Analysis of Their Ability to Identify Vertebrate Animals , 2022, Sustainability.

[2]  M. K. Alam.  Climate change, biosystematics and taxonomy , 2021, Bangladesh Journal of Plant Taxonomy.

[3]  S. Manzano,et al.  How FAIR are plant sciences in the twenty-first century? The pressing need for reproducibility in plant ecology and evolution , 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[4]  Melissa C. Tulig,et al.  World Flora Online: Placing taxonomists at the heart of a definitive and comprehensive global resource on the world's plants , 2020 .

[5]  J. Crisci,et al.  The End of Botany. , 2020, Trends in plant science.

[6]  Muzzazinah,et al.  Plant taxonomy learning and research: A systematics review , 2019, THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, ENVIRONMENT, AND EDUCATION.

[7]  R. Nehm.  Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems , 2019, Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research.

[8]  A. Boujemaa,et al.  Perceptions et Opinions d’Enseignants du Cycle Secondaire relatives à l’Enseignement de la Classification du monde Végétal , 2019, European Scientific Journal ESJ.

[9]  I. Palmberg,et al.  Nordic Student Teachers’ Views on the Most Efficient Teaching and Learning Methods for Species and Species Identification , 2019, Sustainability.

[10]  Suwarsono,et al.  The Influence of Teacher’s Conception of Teaching and Learning on Their Teaching Practice , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[11]  Arja-Liisa Kaasinen,et al.  Plant Species Recognition Skills in Finnish Students and Teachers , 2019, Education Sciences.

[12]  E. Gavish-Regev,et al.  Linking morphological and molecular taxonomy for the identification of poultry house, soil, and nest dwelling mites in the Western Palearctic , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[13]  A. Alami,et al.  Plant Classification Knowledge and Misconceptions among University Students in Morocco , 2019, Education Sciences.

[14]  I. Cintamulya,et al.  Development of a Molecular Plant Taxonomy Textbook. , 2018 .

[15]  Hervé Sauquet,et al.  Key questions and challenges in angiosperm macroevolution. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[16]  I. Palmberg,et al.  Nordic Student Teachers’ Views on the Importance of Species and Species Identification , 2018 .

[17]  Gang Zhu.  “Traditional Teaching Method Still Holds Water”: Narrative Inquiry of Student Teachers’ Professional Identities at the Intersection of Teacher Knowledge and Subject Matter Knowledge , 2017 .

[18]  April N. Wynn,et al.  Student Misconceptions about Plants – A First Step in Building a Teaching Resource† , 2017, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[19]  A. Alami,et al.  STUDY OF SOME LEARNING DIFFICULTIES IN PLANT CLASSIFICATION AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS , 2016 .

[20]  I. Palmberg,et al.  Nordic–Baltic Student Teachers’ Identification of and Interest in Plant and Animal Species: The Importance of Species Identification and Biodiversity for Sustainable Development , 2015 .

[21]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  High School Students’ Learning and Perceptions of Phylogenetics of Flowering Plants , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[22]  Bruce K. Kirchoff,et al.  Optimizing Learning of Scientific Category Knowledge in the Classroom: The Case of Plant Identification , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[23]  Janice L. Anderson,et al.  Understanding Early Elementary Children's Conceptual Knowledge of Plant Structure and Function through Drawings , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[24]  M. Behrendt,et al.  A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education. , 2014 .

[25]  Arun Kumar Pandey,et al.  The changing epitome of species identification - DNA barcoding. , 2014, Saudi journal of biological sciences.

[26]  Tali Tal,et al.  Exemplary practices in field trips to natural environments , 2014 .

[27]  Sabri Sidekli,et al.  PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT CLASSIFICATION OF PLANTS AND CHANGES IN THEIR MISCONCEPTIONS DURING PRE-SERVICE EDUCATION , 2014, Journal of Baltic Science Education.

[28]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[29]  P. Clément,et al.  Les conceptions sur l'évolution biologique d'enseignants du primaire et du secondaire dans 28 pays varient selon leur pays et selon leur niveau d'étude , 2013 .

[30]  Bethan C. Stagg,et al.  Teaching botanical identification to adults: experiences of the UK participatory science project ‘Open Air Laboratories’ , 2013 .

[31]  Selami Yangin.  PRE-SERVICE CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ MISLEARNINGS OF CLASSIFICATION OF THE PLANT KINGDOM AND THE EFFECT OF PORPHYRIOS TREE ON REMOVING THEM , 2013, Journal of Baltic Science Education.

[32]  J. Harding.  Qualitative Data Analysis from Start to Finish , 2013 .

[33]  G. Hellden,et al.  Students’ early experiences of biodiversity and education for a sustainable future , 2012 .

[34]  Brian R. Belland,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Organizing Active Learning Experiences in Biology Instruction , 2012 .

[35]  Lan Qie,et al.  Science communication for biodiversity conservation , 2012 .

[36]  A. H. Malik,et al.  Impediment to Taxonomy and Its Impact on Biodiversity Science: An Indian Perspective , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  C. Perret,et al.  Une formation pédagogique peut-elle modifier les conceptions de jeunes enseignants universitaires sur l’apprentissage et l’enseignement ? , 2012 .

[38]  T. Tal,et al.  Assessing Learning in the Outdoors with the Field Trip in Natural Environments (FiNE) Framework , 2012 .

[39]  U. Hahn,et al.  Further attempts to clarify the importance of category variability for categorisation , 2012 .

[40]  A. Gilburn,et al.  The field course effect: gains in cognitive learning in undergraduate biology students following a field course , 2012 .

[41]  Raymond Goulder,et al.  The Value of Fieldwork in Life and Environmental Sciences in the Context of Higher Education: A Case Study in Learning About Biodiversity , 2012 .

[42]  Karin Stolpe,et al.  Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Applying the dual-memory system model to investigate expert teachers' observational skills in natural ecological learning environments , 2012 .

[43]  Q. Wheeler,et al.  Impediments to taxonomy and users of taxonomy: accessibility and impact evaluation , 2011, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[44]  P. Prokop,et al.  Plants have a chance: outdoor educational programmes alter students' knowledge and attitudes towards plants , 2011 .

[45]  Costas K. Constantinou,et al.  Confidence and Perceived Competence of Preservice Teachers to Implement Biodiversity Education in Primary Schools—Four comparative case studies from Europe , 2011 .

[46]  C. Perret,et al.  Identifier les conceptions de l'enseignement et de l'apprentissage pour accompagner le développement professionnel des enseignants débutants à l'université , 2010 .

[47]  C. Perret,et al.  Les chargés de TD/TP ont-ils tous les mêmes inquiétudes avant leurs premières interventions face aux étudiants ? , 2010 .

[48]  Aurélien Miralles,et al.  The integrative future of taxonomy , 2010, Frontiers in Zoology.

[49]  M. Dikmenli.  Biology Student Teachers' Conceptual Frameworks regarding Biodiversity. , 2010 .

[50]  D. Quicke,et al.  Do shifting baselines in natural history knowledge threaten the environment? , 2010 .

[51]  Marie-Pierre Chopin.  Les usages du « temps » dans les recherches sur l’enseignement , 2010 .

[52]  Matthew J. Muir,et al.  Academic Research Training for a Nonacademic Workplace: a Case Study of Graduate Student Alumni Who Work in Conservation , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[53]  Tali Tal,et al.  Reflective Practice as a Means for Preparing to Teach Outdoors in an Ecological Garden , 2009 .

[54]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Introducing a fifth pedagogy: experience‐based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments , 2009 .

[55]  C. Randler.  Teaching Species Identification--A Prerequisite for Learning Biodiversity and Understanding Ecology. , 2008 .

[56]  Elisabeth Bose,et al.  How Many Species Are There? Public Understanding and Awareness of Biodiversity in Switzerland , 2008 .

[57]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[58]  João Batista Bottentuit Junior,et al.  Using concept maps with postgraduate teachers in a web-based environment : an exploratory study , 2008 .

[59]  A. H. Malik,et al.  Exploring an inherent interface between taxonomy and biodiversity: Current problems and future challenges , 2007 .

[60]  J. Hamilton-Ekeke.  Relative Effectiveness of Expository and Field Trip Methods of Teaching on Students' Achievement in Ecology , 2007 .

[61]  D. Sanders.  Making Public the Private Life of Plants: The contribution of informal learning environments , 2007 .

[62]  G. Hellden,et al.  Reading nature from a ‘bottom-up’ perspective , 2007 .

[63]  Henry Jenkins.  Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[64]  C. Randler,et al.  Cognitive achievements in identification skills , 2006 .

[65]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[66]  Petra Lindemann-Matthies.  Investigating Nature on the Way to School: Responses to an educational programme by teachers and their pupils , 2006 .

[67]  A. Bebbington.  The ability of A-level students to name plants , 2005 .

[68]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Approaches to biology teaching and learning: from assays to assessments--on collecting evidence in science teaching. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[69]  Sheau-Wen Lin.  Development and Application of a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test for High School Students’ Understanding of Flowering Plant Growth and Development , 2004 .

[70]  P. Pintrich.  A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[71]  C. Randler,et al.  Comparing methods of instruction using bird species identification skills as indicators , 2002 .

[72]  Jan D. Vermunt,et al.  Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures , 2002 .

[73]  James H. Wandersee,et al.  Preventing Plant Blindness , 1999 .

[74]  G. Uno.  The State of Precollege Botanical Education. , 1994 .

[75]  David Kember,et al.  Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning , 1993 .

[76]  Rodney M. Feldmann,et al.  Crisis in systematic biology in the “Age of Biodiversity” , 1992, Journal of Paleontology.

[77]  Andrea J. Bingham.  Deductive and Inductive Approaches to Qualitative Data Analysis: The Five-Cycle Process , 2021, Proceedings of the 2021 AERA Annual Meeting.

[78]  Hairul,et al.  CLIMATE CHANGE , BIOSYSTEMATICS AND TAXONOMY , 2021 .

[79]  H. Sharifi,et al.  Inductive and Deductive: Ambiguous Labels in Qualitative Content Analysis , 2018 .

[80]  R. Godin.  Confronting the challenges of participatory culture , 2016 .

[81]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[82]  M. Gaudeul,et al.  Plant taxonomy: a historical perspective, current challenges, and perspectives. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[83]  P. Mayring.  Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution , 2014 .

[84]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Conservation and the botanist effect , 2011 .

[85]  L. Langevin.  Formation et soutien à l'enseignement universitaire , 2007 .

[86]  S. Winterton,et al.  Keys and the crisis in taxonomy: extinction or reinvention? , 2007, Annual review of entomology.

[87]  D. Hershey.  More Misconceptions to Avoid When Teaching about Plants. , 2005 .

[88]  Chantal Wouters,et al.  An exploratory study , 2003 .

[89]  Charles R. Barman,et al.  Assessing Students' Ideas about Plants. , 2002 .

[90]  M. Tardif,et al.  Formation pédagogique des professeurs d’université et conceptions de l’enseignement , 2001 .

[91]  Philip Taylor,et al.  A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching , 1994 .

[92]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .