Clinical predictors of prophylaxis use prior to the onset of acute venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients SWIss Venous ThromboEmbolism Registry (SWIVTER)

Summary.  Background: We investigated clinical predictors of appropriate prophylaxis prior to the onset of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: In 14 Swiss hospitals, 567 consecutive patients (306 medical, 261 surgical) with acute VTE and hospitalization < 30 days prior to the VTE event were enrolled. Results: Prophylaxis was used in 329 (58%) patients within 30 days prior to the VTE event. Among the medical patients, 146 (48%) received prophylaxis, and among the surgical patients, 183 (70%) received prophylaxis (P < 0.001). The indication for prophylaxis was present in 262 (86%) medical patients and in 217 (83%) surgical patients. Among the patients with an indication for prophylaxis, 135 (52%) of the medical patients and 165 (76%) of the surgical patients received prophylaxis (P < 0.001). Admission to the intensive care unit [odds ratio (OR) 3.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.94–5.57], recent surgery (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.51–3.44), bed rest > 3 days (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.45–3.09), obesity (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.03–3.90), prior deep vein thrombosis (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.31–2.24) and prior pulmonary embolism (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05–2.26) were independent predictors of prophylaxis. In contrast, cancer (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.89–1.25), age (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–1.01), acute heart failure (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.79–1.63) and acute respiratory failure (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.89–1.59) were not predictive of prophylaxis. Conclusions: Although an indication for prophylaxis was present in most patients who suffered acute VTE, almost half did not receive any form of prophylaxis. Future efforts should focus on the improvement of prophylaxis for hospitalized patients, particularly in patients with cancer, acute heart or respiratory failure, and in the elderly.

[1]  E. Oger,et al.  Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe , 2007, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[2]  A. Turpie,et al.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism. , 2007, Chest.

[3]  J. Heit,et al.  Estimated annual numbers of US acute‐care hospital patients at risk for venous thromboembolism , 2007, American journal of hematology.

[4]  A. Amin,et al.  Thromboprophylaxis rates in US medical centers: success or failure? , 2007, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[5]  R. Goldberg,et al.  Venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  J. Douketis,et al.  Meta-analysis: Anticoagulant Prophylaxis to Prevent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  R. Dubois,et al.  Hospitals' compliance with prophylaxis guidelines for venous thromboembolism. , 2007, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[8]  P. Chopard,et al.  Identifying acutely ill medical patients requiring thromboprophylaxis , 2006, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[9]  S. Goldhaber,et al.  Prognostic role of echocardiography among patients with acute pulmonary embolism and a systolic arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  D. Hayoz,et al.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients: definite need for improvement , 2005, Journal of internal medicine.

[11]  R. Pendleton,et al.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medically ill patients and the development of strategies to improve prophylaxis rates , 2005, American journal of hematology.

[12]  S. Goldhaber,et al.  Gender differences in the administration of prophylaxis to prevent deep venous thrombosis , 2005, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[13]  Marilyn D Paterno,et al.  Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  R. Otero,et al.  The outcome after treatment of venous thromboembolism is different in surgical and acutely ill medical patients. Findings from the RIETE registry , 2004, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[15]  Clifford W Colwell,et al.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. , 2004, Chest.

[16]  S. Goldhaber,et al.  A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  S. Laporte,et al.  Meta‐analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  J. Heit,et al.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism. , 2001, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[19]  Samuel Z Goldhaber,et al.  Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER) , 1999, The Lancet.

[20]  P. Prandoni,et al.  The clinical course of deep-vein thrombosis. Prospective long-term follow-up of 528 symptomatic patients. , 1997, Haematologica.

[21]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. , 1991, Archives of internal medicine.