Message control intensity: Rationale and preliminary findings

This paper expands on the Rogers and Farace relational communication coding system by offering a definition and measure of message control intensity. The measure is based on the implicit intensity continuum which underlies the coding scheme. As a construct, message control intensity meets the face validity criterion for the “experienced” perspective on communication behavior as described by Poole and Folger. Results from exploratory correlational analyses between message intensity and (1) pronoun usage, (2) transactional structures, (3) control maneuvers, and (4) rigidity and stability measures support the measure's utility and thus provide evidence of its construct validity.

[1]  Arthur Koestler,et al.  Janus: A Summing Up , 1978 .

[2]  H. L. Raush,et al.  Relations at Three Early Stages of Marriage as Reflected by the Use of Personal Pronouns , 1970 .

[3]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Relational Communication: Theory and Research , 1977 .

[4]  F. Millar,et al.  Relational Control and Dyadic Understanding: An Exploratory Predictive Regression Model , 1979 .

[5]  L. Edna Rogers,et al.  New Procedures for Analyzing Relational Communication , 1973 .

[6]  F. Millar,et al.  Domineeringness and dominance: Replication and expansion , 1979 .

[7]  John A. Courtright,et al.  Message Control Intensity as a Predictor of Transactional Redundancy , 1980 .

[8]  J. Bowers.  Language intensity, social introversion, and attitude change , 1963 .

[9]  Lynn Hoffman,et al.  Inside the Family: Toward a Theory of Family Process , 1976 .

[10]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Hugh Dalziel Duncan.  Symbols in Society , 1968 .

[12]  L. E. Rogers,et al.  A relational approach to interpersonal communication. , 1976 .

[13]  John Waite Bowers,et al.  Some correlates of language intensity , 1964 .

[14]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of human communication , 1975 .

[15]  W. Barnett Pearce,et al.  Generality and Necessity in Three Types of Theory About Human Communication, With Special Attention to Rules Theory. , 1977 .

[16]  Frank E. Millar,et al.  DOMINEERINGNESS AND DOMINANCE: A TRANSACTIONAL VIEW , 1979 .

[17]  L. Edna Rogers,et al.  Analysis of Relational Communication in Dyads: New Measurement Procedures , 1975 .

[18]  W. Boyce,et al.  The logical levels of complementary, symmetrical, and parallel interaction classes in family dyads. , 1977, Family process.

[19]  D. Ellis.  Relational control in two group systems , 1979 .