Diversity in Business-to-Business Information Exchange: An Empirical Analysis of Manufacturers and their Trading Partners

This study uses transaction cost economics to examine the specific characteristics of information exchange that affect performance in industrial supply chains. Hypotheses are developed and tested. The first is that there is more information exchange as a firm increases its performance. The second is that the diversity of information exchange is also positively associated with firm performance. The data for the study was collected as part of a larger study. It was gathered from an electronically mediated industrial exchange network. Distinct information exchange characteristics can be captured at the firm level. An ordinary least square (OLS) model shows a good statistical fit for the data. It also demonstrates a high explanatory power for the model. The first hypothesis had a positive result. However, the second did not. Information diversity and firm performance was not supported. Firms that exchanged more types of information with trading partners experienced lower inventory turnover. A number of explanations for the discrepancy are offered, but further investigation is needed. Other sectors of the supply chain could be tested, or additional qualitative data could be gathered.

[1]  M. Cooper MESHING MULTIPLE ALLIANCES , 1997 .

[2]  Richard A. Gooner,et al.  Focal supplier opportunism in supermarket retailer category management , 2007 .

[3]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships , 2003 .

[4]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring the Extent of EDI Usage in Complex Organizations: Strategies and Illustrative Examples , 1996, MIS Q..

[5]  Eve D. Rosenzweig,et al.  The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers , 2003 .

[6]  K. Butner,et al.  The North American Third-Party Logistics Industry in 2011: The Provider CEO Perspective , 2005, Transportation Journal.

[7]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Contracting to Assure Supply: How to Share Demand Forecasts in a Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology (Customer Intimacy) , 1996 .

[10]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[11]  Bob D. Cutler,et al.  Identifying antecedents of information exchange within supply chains , 2002 .

[12]  Benjamin J. Allen,et al.  A LONGITUDINAL ASSESSMENT OF EDI USE IN THE U.S. MOTOR CARRIER INDUSTRY , 1998 .

[13]  George A. Zsidisin,et al.  Shipper-Carrier Relationships and their Effect on Carrier Performance , 2007, Transportation Journal.

[14]  Sunil Gupta,et al.  Supply Chain Decision Making: Will Shorter Cycle Times and Shared Point-of-Sale Information Necessarily Help? , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Ann S. Marucheck,et al.  The Relationship Between EDI and Supplier Reliability , 1997 .

[16]  Sridhar Seshadri,et al.  Information Sharing in a Supply Chain Under ARMA Demand , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Theodore P. Stank,et al.  A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR SUPPLY CHAIN ORIENTED LOGISTICS , 2005 .

[18]  N. Sanders,et al.  IT APPLICATIONS IN SUPPLY CHAIN ORGANIZATIONS: A LINK BETWEEN COMPETITIVE PRIORITIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL BENEFITS , 2002 .

[19]  P. Daugherty,et al.  INFORMATION SUPPORT FOR REVERSE LOGISTICS: THE INFLUENCE OF RELATIONSHIP COMMITMENT , 2002 .

[20]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  Research Report. Can EDI Benefit Adopters? , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  R. Acevedo,et al.  Research report , 1967, Revista odontologica de Puerto Rico.

[22]  Benjamin J. Allen,et al.  The US Motor Carrier Industry: The Extent and Nature of EDI Use , 1992 .

[23]  Roger Clarke,et al.  A contingency model of EDI's impact on industry sectors , 1992, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[25]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  An Econometric Analysis of Inventory Turnover Performance in Retail Services , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Manohar U. Kalwani,et al.  Long-Term Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: Do They Pay off for Supplier Firms? , 1995 .

[27]  J. Machuca,et al.  THE IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE ON REDUCING BULLWHIP EFFECT AND SUPPLY CHAIN INVENTORY COSTS , 2004 .

[28]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[29]  W. Dullaert,et al.  Horizontal Cooperation in Transport and Logistics: A Literature Review , 2007, Transportation Journal.

[30]  H. Nachtmann,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN INFORMATION SHARING IN A VENDOR MANAGED INVENTORY PARTNERSHIP , 2004 .

[31]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..