Vessel Collision Frequency Estimation in the Singapore Strait

This paper aims to estimate Vessel Collision Frequency in the Singapore Strait. This frequency is obtained as the product of the number of Vessel Conflicts and the causation probability using the real-time vessel movement data from the Lloyd’s Marine Intelligence Unit (Lloyd’s MIU) database. The results show that the container carriers have the highest Vessel Collision Frequency while Roll-On Roll-Off (RORO) and passenger ships have the lowest frequency. Tankers cause the highest head-on collision frequency. In the Singapore Strait, the most risky overtaking area is between longitudes 103°48′E and 104°12′E. The most risky head-on area is between longitudes 103°50′E and 104°00′E while the majority of crossing collisions occur between longitudes 103°50′E and 104°12′E. The Vessel Collision Frequency is found to be 1·75 per year in the traffic lanes. Currently, westbound traffic in the Strait is more risky than eastbound traffic (the number of westbound collisions in July was 0·0991 while the number of eastbound collisions was 0·0470). Furthermore, the estimated Vessel Collision Frequency during the day is less than that at night. The results of this paper could be beneficial for the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore to further enhance the navigational safety strategies implemented in the Singapore Strait. 1. INTRODUCTION. The Singapore Strait is a 105 kilometre long strait between the Strait of Malacca in the west and the South China Sea in the east. It links one of the largest ports to the rest of the world and has a high density of vessel traffic. More than 200 vessels pass through the Strait on a daily basis and this gives an annual throughput of approximately 70,000 vessels, carrying 80% of the oil transported to Northeast Asia, as well as one third of the world’s traded goods including Chinese manufactures, Indonesian coffee etc. Although the Singapore Strait is of great importance to the global economy (Wang and Meng, 2011; Qu and Meng, 2012), it is not deep enough for some of the largest vessels (mostly oil tankers). The Strait also has substantial sections of narrower and shallower shipping lanes. At Philips Channel, it narrows to 2·8 kilometres wide, with 2·1 kilometres in the shipping lanes, creating one of the world’s chokepoints. Therefore, the navigational safety of vessels through the

[1]  Elisabeth M. Goodwin,et al.  A Statistical Study of Ship Domains , 1973, Journal of Navigation.

[2]  Yahei Fujii,et al.  II—The Probability of Stranding , 1974 .

[3]  T Macduff,et al.  THE PROBABILITY OF VESSEL COLLISIONS , 1974 .

[4]  B. Tan,et al.  MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF VESSEL CASUALTIES RESULTING FROM TANKER TRAFFIC THROUGH NARROW WATERWAYS , 1999 .

[5]  Fowler,et al.  Modeling Ship Transportation Risk , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Manolis Samuelides,et al.  Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of a RoRo passenger ferry , 2002 .

[7]  Preben Terndrup Pedersen,et al.  Collision risk for fixed offshore structures close to high-density shipping lanes , 2002 .

[8]  Fujio Kaneko,et al.  Methods for probabilistic safety assessments of ships , 2002 .

[9]  Rafal Szlapczynski,et al.  A Unified Measure Of Collision Risk Derived From The Concept Of A Ship Domain , 2006, Journal of Navigation.

[10]  Shell-Ying Huang,et al.  Dynamic Control of Intention Priorities of Human-Like Agents , 2006, ECAI.

[11]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  Ship's Fuzzy Domain – a Criterion for Navigational Safety in Narrow Fairways , 2008, Journal of Navigation.

[12]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  The Ship Domain : A Criterion of Navigational Safety Assessment in an Open Sea Area , 2009 .

[13]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Probability modelling of vessel collisions , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  H. Ligteringen,et al.  Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data , 2010 .

[16]  Ning Wang,et al.  An Intelligent Spatial Collision Risk Based on the Quaternion Ship Domain , 2010, Journal of Navigation.

[17]  Qiang Meng,et al.  The impact of landbridge on the market shares of Asian ports , 2011 .

[18]  Li Suyi,et al.  Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  X. Qu,et al.  The economic importance of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore: An extreme-scenario analysis , 2012 .

[20]  Qiang Meng,et al.  An Overview of Maritime Waterway Quantitative Risk Assessment Models , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.