Image Thumbnails That Represent Blur and Noise

The information about the blur and noise of an original image is lost when a standard image thumbnail is generated by filtering and subsampling. Image browsing becomes difficult since the standard thumbnails do not distinguish between high-quality and low-quality originals. In this paper, an efficient algorithm with a blur-generating component and a noise-generating component preserves the local blur and the noise of the originals. The local blur is rapidly estimated using a scale-space expansion of the standard thumbnail and subsequently used to apply a space-varying blur to the thumbnail. The noise is estimated and rendered by using multirate signal transformations that allow most of the processing to occur at the lower spatial sampling rate of the thumbnail. The new thumbnails provide a quick, natural way for users to identify images of good quality. A subjective evaluation shows the new thumbnails are more representative of their originals for blurry images. The noise generating component improves the results for noisy images, but degrades the results for textured images. The blur generating component of the new thumbnails may always be used to advantage. The decision to use the noise generating component of the new thumbnails should be based on testing with the particular image mix expected for the application.

[1]  Tien-Tsin Wong,et al.  Perceptual image preview , 2008, Multimedia Systems.

[2]  Ramin Samadani,et al.  Representative Image Thumbnails for Good Browsing , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  Local Scale Control for Edge Detection and Blur Estimation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Using thumbnails to search the Web , 2001, CHI.

[5]  Ramin Samadani,et al.  Representative image thumbnails: automatic and manual , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Anil K. Jain.  Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[7]  George Wolberg,et al.  Fast Convolution with Packed Lookup Tables , 1994, Graphics Gems.

[8]  SukHwan Lim,et al.  Characterization of noise in digital photographs for image processing , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Fast algorithms for low-level vision , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] 9th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Javier Portilla,et al.  Efficient Method for Space-Variant Low-Pass Filtering , 1997 .

[11]  Yan Ke,et al.  The Design of High-Level Features for Photo Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[12]  Ramin Samadani.  A fast algorithm for preserving noise while reducing image size , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[13]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Automatic thumbnail cropping and its effectiveness , 2003, UIST '03.

[14]  Robert Bregovic,et al.  Multirate Systems and Filter Banks , 2002 .

[15]  E. L. Lehmann,et al.  Theory of point estimation , 1950 .

[16]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Perceptual blur and ringing metrics: application to JPEG2000 , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[17]  S. Avidan,et al.  Seam carving for content-aware image resizing , 2007, SIGGRAPH 2007.

[18]  Kathrin Berkner,et al.  SmartNails: display- and image-dependent thumbnails , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[19]  A. Willsky.  Multiresolution Markov models for signal and image processing , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[20]  Lina J. Karam,et al.  No-reference objective wavelet based noise immune image sharpness metric , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[21]  Thierry Blu,et al.  Least-squares image resizing using finite differences , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[22]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.