B-471 Extension of Completely Positive Cone Relaxation to Polynomial Optimization

We propose the moment cone relaxation for a class of polynomial optimiza- tion problems (POPs) to extend the results on the completely positive cone programming relaxation for the quadratic optimization (QOP) model by Arima, Kim and Kojima. The moment cone relaxation is constructed to take advantage of sparsity of the POPs, so that efficient numerical methods can be developed in the future. We establish the equivalence between the optimal value of the POP and that of the moment cone relaxation under conditions similar to the ones assumed in the QOP model. The proposed method is compared with the canonical convexification procedure recently proposed by Pena, Vera and Zuluaga for POPs. The moment cone relaxation is theoretically powerful, but nu- merically intractable. For tractable numerical methods, the doubly nonnegative cone relaxation is derived from the moment cone relaxation. Exploiting sparsity in the doubly nonnegative cone relaxation and its incorporation into Lasserre's semidefinite relaxation are briefly discussed.

[1]  Franz Rendl,et al.  Copositive and semidefinite relaxations of the quadratic assignment problem , 2009, Discret. Optim..

[2]  Bastian Goldlücke,et al.  Variational Analysis , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[3]  Mirjam Dür,et al.  Copositive Programming – a Survey , 2010 .

[4]  Etienne de Klerk,et al.  Approximation of the Stability Number of a Graph via Copositive Programming , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[5]  Akiko Yoshise,et al.  On optimization over the doubly nonnegative cone , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design.

[6]  Masakazu Muramatsu,et al.  SparsePOP: a Sparse Semidefinite Programming Relaxation of Polynomial Optimization Problems , 2005 .

[7]  Masakazu Kojima,et al.  Exploiting Sparsity in SDP Relaxation of Polynomial Optimization Problems , 2012 .

[8]  Jean B. Lasserre,et al.  Global Optimization with Polynomials and the Problem of Moments , 2000, SIAM J. Optim..

[9]  Etienne de Klerk,et al.  Solving Standard Quadratic Optimization Problems via Linear, Semidefinite and Copositive Programming , 2002, J. Glob. Optim..

[10]  C. Carathéodory Über den Variabilitätsbereich der Koeffizienten von Potenzreihen, die gegebene Werte nicht annehmen , 1907 .

[11]  Stanislav Busygin,et al.  Copositive Programming , 2009, Encyclopedia of Optimization.

[12]  Pablo A. Parrilo,et al.  Semidefinite programming relaxations for semialgebraic problems , 2003, Math. Program..

[13]  Samuel Burer,et al.  On the copositive representation of binary and continuous nonconvex quadratic programs , 2009, Math. Program..

[14]  Jos F. Sturm,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones , 1999 .

[15]  Samuel Burer,et al.  Representing quadratically constrained quadratic programs as generalized copositive programs , 2012, Oper. Res. Lett..

[16]  Franz Rendl,et al.  A Copositive Programming Approach to Graph Partitioning , 2007, SIAM J. Optim..

[17]  Masakazu Kojima,et al.  A Quadratically Constrained Quadratic Optimization Model for Completely Positive Cone Programming , 2013, SIAM J. Optim..

[18]  Gabriele Eichfelder,et al.  On the set-semidefinite representation of nonconvex quadratic programs over arbitrary feasible sets , 2013, Optim. Lett..

[19]  Masakazu Muramatsu,et al.  Sums of Squares and Semidefinite Programming Relaxations for Polynomial Optimization Problems with Structured Sparsity , 2004 .