Neck circumference as a simple screening measure for identifying overweight and obese patients.

OBJECTIVE There are numerous methods of assessing overweight and obesity. We undertook an observational study to test a method of identifying overweight or obese patients solely by measuring the circumference of the neck. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES A test sample and a second validation sample included 979 subjects (460 men and 519 women), who visited a family medicine clinic in a southern Israeli urban district for any reason between the randomly chosen months of January and September 1998. Main outcome included neck, waist, and hip circumferences; body mass index (BMI); and waist:hip ratio measures. RESULTS Pearson's correlation coefficients indicated a significant association between neck circumference (NC) and: BMI (men, r = 0.83; women, r = 0.71; each, p < 0.0001), age (men, r = 0.33; women, r = 0.36; each, p < 0.0001), weight (men, r = 0.7; women, r = 0.81; each, p < 0.0001), waist circumference (men, r = 0.86; women, r = 0.85; each, p < 0.0001), hip circumference (men, r = 0.62; women, r = 0.56; each, p < 0.0001), and waist:hip ratio (men, r = 0.66; women, r = 0.87; each, p < 0.0001). NC > or=37 cm for men and > or =34 cm for women were the best cutoff levels for determining the subjects with BMI > or =25.0 kg/m(2) using the receiver output curve analysis. In the validation unrelated group, the test characteristics were excellent with 98% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 94% accuracy for men, and 100% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 99% accuracy for women. NC > or =39.5 cm for men and > or =36.5 cm for women were the best cutoff levels for determining the subjects with BMI > or =30 kg/m(2) using the receiver output curve analysis. In the validation unrelated group, the test characteristics were excellent with 93% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 91% accuracy for men, and 93% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 97% accuracy for women. DISCUSSION NC measurement is a simple and time-saving screening measure that can be used to identify overweight and obese patients. Men with NC <37 cm and women with NC <34 cm are not to be considered overweight. Patients with NC > or =37 cm for men and > or =34 cm for women require additional evaluation of overweight or obesity status.

[1]  P. Deurenberg,et al.  Resting metabolic rate and diet-induced thermogenesis in abdominal and gluteal-femoral obese women before and after weight reduction. , 1988, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[2]  M. Ashwell.  Obesity in men and women. , 1994, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[3]  J. Seidell,et al.  Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sample , 1995, BMJ.

[4]  M. Jensen,et al.  Lipolysis: contribution from regional fat. , 1997, Annual review of nutrition.

[5]  L. Lissner,et al.  Relationships between changes in body composition and changes in cardiovascular risk factors: the SOS Intervention Study. Swedish Obese Subjects. , 1997, Obesity research.

[6]  L. Lissner,et al.  Body compartment and subcutaneous adipose tissue distribution--risk factor patterns in obese subjects. , 1995, Obesity research.

[7]  R. Pasquali,et al.  Interrelationships between body weight, body fat distribution and insulin in obese women before and after hypocaloric feeding and weight loss. , 1989, Annals of nutrition & metabolism.

[8]  C. Morrison,et al.  Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management , 1995, BMJ.

[9]  Obesity: new insight into the anthropometric classification of fat distribution shown by computed tomography. , 1985 .

[10]  A. Kissebah,et al.  Relation of Body Fat Distribution to Metabolic Complications of Obesity , 1982 .

[11]  P. Björntorp,et al.  Abdominal adipose tissue distribution, obesity, and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: 13 year follow up of participants in the study of men born in 1913. , 1984, British medical journal.

[12]  M. Carroll,et al.  Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994 , 1998, International Journal of Obesity.

[13]  M. Jensen,et al.  Differential health benefits of weight loss in upper-body and lower-body obese women. , 1993, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[14]  K. Flegal,et al.  Assessing obesity: classification and epidemiology. , 1997, British medical bulletin.

[15]  R N Pierson,et al.  How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups? , 1996, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  K. Pennert,et al.  Distribution of adipose tissue and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: a 12 year follow up of participants in the population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. , 1984, British medical journal.

[17]  J. Vague,et al.  The degree of masculine differentiation of obesities: a factor determining predisposition to diabetes, atherosclerosis, gout, and uric calculous disease. , 1956, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  A Tremblay,et al.  Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  Claude Bouchard,et al.  Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: Executive summary , 1998 .