Differential Privacy for Stackelberg Games

This paper introduces a differentially private (DP) mechanism to protect the information exchanged during the coordination of sequential and interdependent markets. This coordination represents a classic Stackelberg game and relies on the exchange of sensitive information between the system agents. The paper is motivated by the observation that the perturbation introduced by traditional DP mechanisms fundamentally changes the underlying optimization problem and even leads to unsatisfiable instances. To remedy such limitation, the paper introduces the Privacy-Preserving Stackelberg Mechanism (PPSM), a framework that enforces the notions of feasibility and fidelity of the privacy-preserving information to the original problem objective. PPSM complies with the notion of differential privacy and ensures that the outcomes of the privacy-preserving coordination mechanism are close-to-optimality for each agent. Experimental results on several gas and electricity market benchmarks based on a real case study demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.

[1]  Ashwin Machanavajjhala,et al.  Principled Evaluation of Differentially Private Algorithms using DPBench , 2015, SIGMOD Conference.

[2]  J. Cruz,et al.  On the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero-sum games , 1973 .

[3]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  Unlocking the Value of Privacy: Trading Aggregate Statistics over Private Correlated Data , 2018, KDD.

[4]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Differential Privacy for Power Grid Obfuscation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[5]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Differentially private data release for data mining , 2011, KDD.

[6]  A. Conejo,et al.  Strategic Offering for a Wind Power Producer , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  J. van Leeuwen,et al.  Theoretical Computer Science , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[8]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Unit Commitment With Gas Network Awareness , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  H. Madsen,et al.  Pool Strategy of a Price-Maker Wind Power Producer , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  G. Saridis,et al.  Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Approximate Solutions to the Time-invariant Hamilton-jacobi-bellman Equation 1 , 1998 .

[11]  Aaron Roth,et al.  The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy , 2014, Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci..

[12]  Quanyan Zhu,et al.  Dependable Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid: A Stackelberg Game Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Ninghui Li,et al.  PriView: practical differentially private release of marginal contingency tables , 2014, SIGMOD Conference.

[14]  J. Lang,et al.  A Combined Equivalenced-Electric, Economic, and Market Representation of the Northeastern Power Coordinating Council U.S. Electric Power System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Optimality of the Laplace Mechanism in Differential Privacy , 2015, ArXiv.

[16]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Differentially Private Data Release through Multidimensional Partitioning , 2010, Secure Data Management.

[17]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis , 2006, TCC.

[18]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Constrained-Based Differential Privacy: Releasing Optimal Power Flow Benchmarks Privately - Releasing Optimal Power Flow Benchmarks Privately , 2018, CPAIOR.

[19]  Catuscia Palamidessi,et al.  Broadening the Scope of Differential Privacy Using Metrics , 2013, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[20]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Obfuscation of Critical Infrastructure Networks , 2019, IJCAI.

[21]  Ferdinando Fioretto,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Power System Obfuscation: A Bilevel Optimization Approach , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Andrew McGregor,et al.  Optimizing linear counting queries under differential privacy , 2009, PODS.