The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.

The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Code (SNARC) effect refers to the finding that small or large numbers elicit faster leftward or rightward responses, respectively. Traditionally, this effect has been thought to reflect the intrinsic spatial orientation of the mental number line (MNL account) and thus to be modulated by the amount of semantic processing required by the task. This study aimed to test this hypothesis. Participants performed two tasks requiring semantic processing (magnitude classification and parity judgement) and two tasks requiring the processing of non-semantic features of the number (phoneme detection and color judgement). Contrary to the MNL account, the SNARC effect in the four tasks was not modulated by the amount of semantic processing, but rather by response latency. These results provide evidence against the MNL account and in favor of alternative accounts (dual-route model, working memory account).

[1]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Multi-digit number processing: Overview, conceptual clarifications, and language influences. , 2015 .

[2]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task , 2009, Cognition.

[3]  W. Fias,et al.  How Does Working Memory Enable Number-Induced Spatial Biases? , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[4]  S. Göbel.  Up or down? Reading direction influences vertical counting direction in the horizontal plane – a cross-cultural comparison , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[5]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Estimating linear effects in ANOVA designs: The easy way , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[6]  Wim Gevers,et al.  Spatial coding of ordinal information in short- and long-term memory , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations , 2011, Cognition.

[8]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  K. Willmes,et al.  The universal SNARC effect: the association between number magnitude and space is amodal. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[11]  Lisa Maxfield,et al.  Attention and Semantic Priming: A Review of Prime Task Effects , 1997, Consciousness and Cognition.

[12]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Deconstructing spatial-numerical associations , 2018, Cognition.

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli , 2001, Cognition.

[14]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Heterogeneous Nature of Number–Space Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[17]  W. Gevers,et al.  The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Children’s Arithmetic Development , 2014, Psychological science.

[19]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Primed numbers : Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming , 1999 .

[20]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  The Cultural Number Line: A Review of Cultural and Linguistic Influences on the Development of Number Processing , 2011 .

[21]  C. Schiltz,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Number-Space Associations Differentially Relate to Interference Control in Young Adults With ADHD , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[22]  Wim Fias,et al.  Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  S. Shaki,et al.  Which numbers do you have in mind? Number generation is influenced by reading direction , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[24]  D G Pelli,et al.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[25]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Reading space into numbers – a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect , 2008, Cognition.

[26]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect , 2008 .

[27]  Hans-Christoph Nuerk,et al.  Is the SNARC Effect Related to the Level of Mathematics? No Systematic Relationship Observed despite More Power, More Repetitions, and More Direct Assessment of Arithmetic Skill , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.

[29]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[30]  Wim Fias,et al.  The temporary nature of number-space interactions. , 2016, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[31]  Guilherme Maia de Oliveira Wood,et al.  Finding the SNARC Instead of Hunting It: A 20∗20 Monte Carlo Investigation , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[32]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  W Fias,et al.  Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect , 2001, Psychological research.

[34]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Direction counts: a comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[35]  Christine Schiltz,et al.  How and Why Do Number-Space Associations Co-Vary in Implicit and Explicit Magnitude Processing Tasks? , 2017, J. Numer. Cogn..

[36]  C. Plewnia,et al.  Switching between Multiple Codes of SNARC-Like Associations: Two Conceptual Replication Attempts with Anodal tDCS in Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Design , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[37]  Wim Fias,et al.  Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  J. Bakdash,et al.  Repeated Measures Correlation , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[39]  Freya Acar,et al.  A Working Memory Account of the Interaction between Numbers and Spatial Attention , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition , 2003, Cognition.

[43]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Spatial–Numerical and Ordinal Positional Associations Coexist in Parallel , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[44]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[45]  C. Plewnia,et al.  Prefrontal neuromodulation reverses spatial associations of non-numerical sequences, but not numbers , 2017, Biological Psychology.

[46]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[47]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[48]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[49]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[50]  Hans-Christoph Nuerk,et al.  Space in Numerical and Ordinal Information: A Common Construct? , 2017, J. Numer. Cogn..

[51]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  Linking numbers to space: from the mental number line towards a hybrid account , 2015 .

[52]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  On defining quantifying and measuring the SNARC effect , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[53]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.