The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Klaus Willmes,et al. Multi-digit number processing: Overview, conceptual clarifications, and language influences. , 2015 .
[2] Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al. Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task , 2009, Cognition.
[3] W. Fias,et al. How Does Working Memory Enable Number-Induced Spatial Biases? , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[4] S. Göbel. Up or down? Reading direction influences vertical counting direction in the horizontal plane – a cross-cultural comparison , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[5] J. Tzelgov,et al. Estimating linear effects in ANOVA designs: The easy way , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.
[6] Wim Gevers,et al. Spatial coding of ordinal information in short- and long-term memory , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[7] Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al. A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations , 2011, Cognition.
[8] Yang Seok Cho,et al. Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.
[9] R. Ratcliff. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[10] K. Willmes,et al. The universal SNARC effect: the association between number magnitude and space is amodal. , 2005, Experimental psychology.
[11] Lisa Maxfield,et al. Attention and Semantic Priming: A Review of Prime Task Effects , 1997, Consciousness and Cognition.
[12] M. H. Fischer,et al. Deconstructing spatial-numerical associations , 2018, Cognition.
[13] S. Dehaene,et al. Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli , 2001, Cognition.
[14] Samuel Shaki,et al. Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[15] Wim Fias,et al. The Heterogeneous Nature of Number–Space Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[16] ROBERT S. MOYER,et al. Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.
[17] W. Gevers,et al. The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line , 2008, Cognition.
[18] Charles Hulme,et al. Children’s Arithmetic Development , 2014, Psychological science.
[19] Stanislas Dehaene,et al. Primed numbers : Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming , 1999 .
[20] Martin H. Fischer,et al. The Cultural Number Line: A Review of Cultural and Linguistic Influences on the Development of Number Processing , 2011 .
[21] C. Schiltz,et al. Implicit and Explicit Number-Space Associations Differentially Relate to Interference Control in Young Adults With ADHD , 2018, Front. Psychol..
[22] Wim Fias,et al. Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] S. Shaki,et al. Which numbers do you have in mind? Number generation is influenced by reading direction , 2015, Cognitive Processing.
[24] D G Pelli,et al. Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[25] Martin H. Fischer,et al. Reading space into numbers – a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect , 2008, Cognition.
[26] Guilherme Wood,et al. On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect , 2008 .
[27] Hans-Christoph Nuerk,et al. Is the SNARC Effect Related to the Level of Mathematics? No Systematic Relationship Observed despite More Power, More Repetitions, and More Direct Assessment of Arithmetic Skill , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[28] Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al. The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.
[29] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[30] Wim Fias,et al. The temporary nature of number-space interactions. , 2016, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[31] Guilherme Maia de Oliveira Wood,et al. Finding the SNARC Instead of Hunting It: A 20∗20 Monte Carlo Investigation , 2017, Front. Psychol..
[32] Michaël A. Stevens,et al. A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[33] W Fias,et al. Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect , 2001, Psychological research.
[34] Samuel Shaki,et al. Direction counts: a comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[35] Christine Schiltz,et al. How and Why Do Number-Space Associations Co-Vary in Implicit and Explicit Magnitude Processing Tasks? , 2017, J. Numer. Cogn..
[36] C. Plewnia,et al. Switching between Multiple Codes of SNARC-Like Associations: Two Conceptual Replication Attempts with Anodal tDCS in Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Design , 2017, Front. Neurosci..
[37] Wim Fias,et al. Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[38] J. Bakdash,et al. Repeated Measures Correlation , 2017, Front. Psychol..
[39] Freya Acar,et al. A Working Memory Account of the Interaction between Numbers and Spatial Attention , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[40] Peter Brugger,et al. Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.
[41] Samuel Shaki,et al. Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[42] J. Hoffmann,et al. Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition , 2003, Cognition.
[43] Klaus Willmes,et al. Spatial–Numerical and Ordinal Positional Associations Coexist in Parallel , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[44] D G Pelli,et al. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[45] C. Plewnia,et al. Prefrontal neuromodulation reverses spatial associations of non-numerical sequences, but not numbers , 2017, Biological Psychology.
[46] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[47] S. Geisser,et al. On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .
[48] S. Dehaene,et al. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .
[49] Daniël Lakens,et al. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[50] Hans-Christoph Nuerk,et al. Space in Numerical and Ordinal Information: A Common Construct? , 2017, J. Numer. Cogn..
[51] Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al. Linking numbers to space: from the mental number line towards a hybrid account , 2015 .
[52] J. Tzelgov,et al. On defining quantifying and measuring the SNARC effect , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[53] S. Dehaene,et al. Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.