Taking Heisenberg’s Potentia Seriously

It is argued that quantum theory is best understood as requiring an ontological duality of res extensa and res potentia, where the latter is understood per Heisenberg’s original proposal, and the former is roughly equivalent to Descartes’ ‘extended substance.’ However, this is not a dualism of mutually exclusive substances in the classical Cartesian sense, and therefore does not inherit the infamous ‘mind-body’ problem. Rather, res potentia and res extensa are proposed as mutually implicative ontological extants that serve to explain the key conceptual challenges of quantum theory; in particular, nonlocality, entanglement, null measurements, and wave function collapse. It is shown that a natural account of these quantum perplexities emerges, along with a need to reassess our usual ontological commitments involving the nature of space and time.

[1]  R. E. Kastner.  The Emergence of Spacetime: Transactions and Causal Sets , 2014 .

[2]  Timothy E. Eastman,et al.  Duality without Dualism , 2007 .

[3]  Is There Really "Retrocausation" in Time-Symmetric Approaches to Quantum Mechanics? , 2016, 1607.04196.

[4]  Michael Epperson,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead , 2004 .

[5]  R. E. Kastner.  The Transactional Interpretation and its Evolution into the 21st Century: An Overview , 2016 .

[6]  D. Bohm,et al.  Further Considerations on Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory , 1961 .

[7]  W. Heisenberg,et al.  The development of the interpretation of the quantum theory , 1955 .

[8]  R. Kastner.  The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: The Reality of Possibility , 2012 .

[9]  D. Chalmers.  Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness , 1995 .

[10]  D. Bohm.  A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[11]  E. Zafiris.  Quantum Event Structures from the Perspective of Grothendieck Topoi , 2004 .

[12]  R. Griffiths.  What quantum measurements measure , 2017, 1704.08725.

[13]  D. Bohm,et al.  Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory , 1959 .

[14]  Mauricio Suárez,et al.  Quantum Selections, Propensities and the Problem of Measurement , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[15]  J. Mitchard.  The Theory of Relativity , 1921, Nature.

[16]  R. Griffiths.  Consistent Quantum Theory , 2001 .

[17]  E. Zafiris.  Generalized topological covering systems on quantum events' structures , 2006 .

[18]  Michael Epperson.  Quantum Mechanics and Relational Realism: Logical Causality and Wave Function Collapse , 2009, Process Studies.

[19]  Ernan McMullin,et al.  A Case for Scientific Realism , 2004 .

[20]  Virendra. Singh.  Causal quantum mechanics , 1997 .

[21]  Travis Norsen,et al.  Bell's theorem , 2011, Scholarpedia.

[22]  R. Sutherland.  Lagrangian Description for Particle Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: Entangled Many-Particle Case , 2015, Foundations of Physics.

[23]  M. Silberstein,et al.  Why quantum mechanics favors adynamical and acausal interpretations such as relational blockworld over backwardly causal and time-symmetric rivals , 2008 .

[24]  D. Howard.  Popper and Bohr on Realism in Quantum Mechanics , 2012 .

[25]  M. Berry.  Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes , 1984, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[26]  A. Mallios,et al.  The Homological Kähler-De Rham Differential Mechanism part I: Application in General Theory of Relativity , 2011 .

[27]  S. Weidenschilling,et al.  A plurality of worlds , 1991, Nature.

[28]  E. A. Milne,et al.  Physics and Philosophy , 2015, The Medico-chirurgical review.

[29]  Huw Price,et al.  Disentangling the Quantum World , 2015, Entropy.

[30]  N. David Mermin,et al.  An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics , 2013, 1311.5253.

[31]  'Einselection' of Pointer Observables: The New H-Theorem? , 2014, 1406.4126.

[32]  On the Status of the Measurement Problem: Recalling the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation , 2017, Adventures in Quantumland.

[33]  M Zahid Hasan,et al.  Three-Dimensional Topological Insulators , 2010, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics.

[34]  C. Ronde.  Modality, Potentiality and Contradiction in Quantum Mechanics , 2015, 1502.05081.