Particle shape effect on macro‐ and micro‐behaviors of monodisperse ellipsoids

The microscopic and macroscopic behaviors of assemblages of monodisperse ellipsoids with different particle shapes were studied using the discrete element method. Four samples were created with 1170 identical prolate ellipsoids. The samples were compressed isotropically to 100 kPa. Then triaxial compression tests were carried out to very large strains until the ultimate state was reached. This paper presents typical macroscopic result including stress–strain relationship and volumetric behavior. In addition, the fabric of the samples was examined at the initial state, at the peak shear strength state, and at the ultimate state. We studied the evolution of three vector-typed micromechanical arguments with strain including the particle orientation, branch vector, and normal contact force. The normal contact force (micromechanical argument) was found to have a direct relationship with the principal stress ratio (macroscopic parameter). The angles between these vectors were also investigated. The maximum angle between vectors is related to particle shape. The results indicate that the distributions and the maximum values of these angles do not change with loading. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  T. Ng,et al.  A three-dimensional discrete element model using arrays of ellipsoids , 1997 .

[2]  T. Ng.  Input Parameters of Discrete Element Methods , 2006 .

[3]  P. Guo,et al.  Drained Cyclic Behavior of Sand with Fabric Dependence , 2001 .

[4]  Marco Petrangeli,et al.  Fiber Element for Cyclic Bending and Shear of RC Structures. I: Theory , 1999 .

[5]  T. Ng.  Hydrostatic Boundaries in Discrete Element Methods , 2002 .

[6]  G. S. Watson,et al.  The Statistics of Orientation Data , 1966, The Journal of Geology.

[7]  Aleksandar Donev,et al.  Underconstrained jammed packings of nonspherical hard particles: ellipses and ellipsoids. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Ching S. Chang,et al.  Stress-strain relationship for granular materials based on the hypothesis of best fit , 1997 .

[9]  Tang-Tat Ng,et al.  Triaxial Test Simulations with Discrete Element Method and Hydrostatic Boundaries , 2004 .

[10]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  Micromechanical features of granular assemblies with planar elliptical particles , 1992 .

[11]  Roux,et al.  Force Distributions in Dense Two-Dimensional Granular Systems. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[12]  C. Thornton.  NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF DEVIATORIC SHEAR DEFORMATION OF GRANULAR MEDIA , 2000 .

[13]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  A Micromechanical Description of Granular Material Behavior , 1981 .

[14]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  CONSTITUTIVE MODELING OF INHERENTLY ANISOTROPIC SAND BEHAVIOR , 2002 .

[15]  T. Ng.  Macro- and micro-behaviors of granular materials under different sample preparation methods and stress paths , 2004 .

[16]  G. Simmons,et al.  Comparison of static and dynamic measurements of compressibility of rocks , 1965 .

[17]  Pierre-Yves Hicher,et al.  An elasto-plastic model for granular materials with microstructural consideration , 2005 .

[18]  Tang-Tat Ng.  Fabric evolution of ellipsoidal arrays with different particle shapes , 2001 .

[19]  John M. Ting,et al.  Effect of particle shape on the strength and deformation mechanisms of ellipse‐shaped granular assemblages , 1995 .

[20]  Nigel Woodcock,et al.  Specification of fabric shapes using an eigenvalue method , 1977 .

[21]  A. A. Mirghasemi,et al.  Influence of particle shape on engineering properties of assemblies of two-dimensional polygon-shaped particles , 2002 .