RSVP Reading on a Smart Watch

Reading with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) has shown promise for optimizing screen space and increasing reading speed without compromising comprehension. Given the wide use of small-screen devices, the present study compared RSVP and traditional reading on three types of reading comprehension, reading speed, and subjective measures on a smart watch. Results confirm previous studies that show faster reading speed with RSVP without detracting from comprehension. Subjective data indicate that Traditional is strongly preferred to RSVP as a primary reading method. Given the optimal use of screen space, increased speed and comparable comprehension, future studies should focus on making RSVP a more comfortable format.

[1]  R. P. Fishburne,et al.  Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel , 1975 .

[2]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Chien-Hsiung Chen,et al.  Effects of dynamic display, presentation method, speed, and task type on reading comprehension of wristwatch screens , 2008, Displays.

[4]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Reading without saccadic eye movements , 1992, Vision Research.

[5]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading revisited , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Gustav Öquist,et al.  Eye movement study of reading text on a mobile phone using paging, scrolling, leading, and RSVP , 2007, MUM.

[7]  R. Flesch A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  K. Rayner The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  James F. Juola,et al.  The use of computer displays to improve reading comprehension , 1988 .

[10]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation in reading: The case of Spritz , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis ☆ , 1990 .

[12]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Low vision reading with sequential word presentation , 1994, Vision Research.

[13]  Mary C. Potter,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation (rsvp): a method for studying language processing , 2018 .

[14]  L. C. Gilbert Saccadic movements as a factor in visual perception in reading. , 1959 .

[15]  Carol Bergfeld,et al.  Reading text from computer screens , 1987, CSUR.

[16]  Monica S. Castelhano,et al.  Optimizing the reading of electronic text using rapid serial visual presentation , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Björn Hedin,et al.  A Comparison of Presentation Methods for Reading on Mobile Phones , 2007, IEEE Distributed Systems Online.

[18]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Is RSVP a Solution for Reading From Small Displays , 2000 .

[19]  M. Masson Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Mikael Goldstein,et al.  Towards an improved readability on mobile devices: evaluating adaptive rapid serial visual presentation , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[21]  M. Crawford The Art of Readable Writing , 1969 .

[22]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Psychology of Reading , 2012 .

[23]  Peter Kolb,et al.  DISCO: A Multilingual Database of Distributionally Similar Words , 2008 .

[24]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Reading Online Text With a Poor Layout: Is Performance Worse? , 2005 .

[25]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  Continuous Subjective Workload Assessment Technique , 1998 .