Carmel Versus Flakey: A Comparison of Two Winners

■ The University of Michigan’s CARMEL and SRI International’s FLAKEY were the first- and secondplace finishers, respectively, at the 1992 Robot Competition sponsored by the American Association for Artificial Intelligence. The two teams used vastly different approaches in the design of their robots. Many of these differences were for technical reasons, although time constraints, financial resources, and long-term research objectives also played a part. This article gives a technical comparison of CARMEL and FLAKEY, focusing on design issues that were not directly reflected in the scoring criteria.

[1]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Noise rejection for ultrasonic sensors in mobile robot applications , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Modeling Spatial Knowledge , 1978, IJCAI.

[3]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Robot Motion Planning with Uncertainty in Control and Sensing , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Yoram Koren,et al.  The vector field histogram-fast obstacle avoidance for mobile robots , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Histogramic in-motion mapping for mobile robot obstacle avoidance , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[6]  Kurt Konolige,et al.  Blending reactivity and goal-directedness in a fuzzy controller , 1993, [Proceedings 1993] Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.