Still Stratus Not Altocumulus: Further Evidence against the Date/Party Hub Distinction

Analysis of multi-validated protein interaction data reveals networks with greater interconnectivity than the more segregated structures seen in previously available data. To help visualize this, the authors draw comparisons between continuous stratus clouds and altocumulus clouds.

[1]  J. Hartigan,et al.  The Dip Test of Unimodality , 1985 .

[2]  P. M. Hartigan,et al.  Computation of the Dip Statistic to Test for Unimodality , 1985 .

[3]  D. Botstein,et al.  The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. , 1998, Science.

[4]  Michael Ruogu Zhang,et al.  Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[5]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast , 1999, Nature.

[7]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[8]  T. Hughes,et al.  Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. , 2000, Science.

[9]  Peter Walter,et al.  Functional and Genomic Analyses Reveal an Essential Coordination between the Unfolded Protein Response and ER-Associated Degradation , 2000, Cell.

[10]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  P. Brown,et al.  New components of a system for phosphate accumulation and polyphosphate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by genomic expression analysis. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[12]  D. Botstein,et al.  Arrest, adaptation, and recovery following a chromosome double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[13]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[14]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[16]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  90S pre-ribosomes include the 35S pre-rRNA, the U3 snoRNP, and 40S subunit processing factors but predominantly lack 60S synthesis factors. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[17]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[18]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network , 2002, Science.

[19]  B. Pugh,et al.  Interplay of TBP inhibitors in global transcriptional control. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[20]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Transcriptome profiling to identify genes involved in peroxisome assembly and function , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genome-wide Analysis of Gene Expression Regulated by the Calcineurin/Crz1p Signaling Pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae * , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  D. Pe’er,et al.  Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Nada Amin,et al.  Global architecture of genetic interactions on the protein network , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  T. Ideker,et al.  Integrating phenotypic and expression profiles to map arsenic-response networks , 2004, Genome Biology.

[25]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[26]  T. Hughes,et al.  High-definition macromolecular composition of yeast RNA-processing complexes. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[27]  T. Hughes,et al.  Exploration of Essential Gene Functions via Titratable Promoter Alleles , 2004, Cell.

[28]  S. Haggarty,et al.  Finding new components of the target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling network through chemical genetics and proteome chips. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Adjusting for selection on synonymous sites in estimates of evolutionary distance. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[30]  Hunter B. Fraser,et al.  Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[31]  C. Wilke,et al.  Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Vidal,et al.  Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[34]  T. Ideker,et al.  Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Journal of biology.

[35]  Philip M. Kim,et al.  Relating Three-Dimensional Structures to Protein Networks Provides Evolutionary Insights , 2006, Science.

[36]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[37]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Evolutionary and Physiological Importance of Hub Proteins , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  K. Kwast,et al.  Metabolic-State-Dependent Remodeling of the Transcriptome in Response to Anoxia and Subsequent Reoxygenation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Eukaryotic Cell.

[39]  George G. Roberts,et al.  Transcriptome profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during a transition from fermentative to glycerol-based respiratory growth reveals extensive metabolic and structural remodeling , 2006, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[40]  M. Tyers,et al.  Stratus Not Altocumulus: A New View of the Yeast Protein Interaction Network , 2006, PLoS biology.

[41]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[42]  These authors contributed equally to this work. , 2007 .

[43]  Marc Vidal,et al.  Confirmation of Organized Modularity in the Yeast Interactome , 2007, PLoS biology.

[44]  J. Vivanco.  To whom correspondence should be addressed , 2009 .