Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Effects of Elinogrel: Results of the Platelet Function Substudy From the Intravenous and Oral Administration of Elinogrel to Evaluate Tolerability and Efficacy in Nonurgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients (INNOVATE-PCI) Trial

Background— Elinogrel is the only selective, competitive and reversible platelet P2Y12 inhibitor available in both intravenous (IV) and oral formulations. Methods and Results— This substudy of the Intravenous and Oral Administration of Elinogrel to Evaluate Tolerability and Efficacy in Nonurgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention patients (INNOVATE-PCI) trial evaluated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of two dosing regimens of IV followed by oral elinogrel (120 mg IV plus 100 mg oral twice daily; 120 mg IV plus 150 mg oral twice daily) versus standard clopidogrel therapy (300–600 mg oral loading dose plus 75 mg oral maintenance dose) in 56 patients undergoing nonurgent PCI. At time of randomization, 71.4% (40/56) of patients were using maintenance clopidogrel therapy. In the acute phase, an IV bolus of elinogrel achieved more rapid and potent antiplatelet effects compared with clopidogrel, which were sustained during the transition from the IV to the oral formulation in the first 24 hours of the peri-PCI period. During chronic therapy, elinogrel achieved similar levels of platelet reactivity compared with clopidogrel before the next oral dose and, although platelet reactivity was lower with elinogrel up to 6 hours after daily oral maintenance dosing, these differences were not statistically significant. These pharmacodynamic effects matched the pharmacokinetic profile of elinogrel. There were no differences in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects between the two elinogrel dosing regimens. Conclusions— Compared with clopidogrel, the combination of IV and oral elinogrel achieves more rapid and enhanced antiplatelet effects that were sustained through the transition to oral elinogrel in the peri-PCI period, but these were not significant during chronic dosing in this pilot investigation. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00751231.

[1]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate a Novel Selective and Reversible Intravenous and Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Elinogrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Nonurgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The INNOVATE-PCI Trial , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  P. Conley,et al.  Thienopyridines, but Not Elinogrel, Result in Off-Target Effects at the Vessel Wall That Contribute to Bleeding , 2011, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[3]  R. Evans,et al.  Extracellular Ca2+ modulates ADP-evoked aggregation through altered agonist degradation: implications for conditions used to study P2Y receptor activation , 2011, British journal of haematology.

[4]  T. Costigan,et al.  Increased platelet inhibition after switching from maintenance clopidogrel to prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results of the SWAP (SWitching Anti Platelet) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Elinogrel: pharmacological principles, preclinical and early phase clinical testing. , 2010, Future cardiology.

[7]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Rationale and design of the randomized, double-blind trial testing INtraveNous and Oral administration of elinogrel, a selective and reversible P2Y(12)-receptor inhibitor, versus clopidogrel to eVAluate Tolerability and Efficacy in nonurgent Percutaneous Coronary Interventions patients (INNOVATE-PCI , 2010, American heart journal.

[8]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Platelet function testing and risk of bleeding complications , 2010, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[9]  J. Eikelboom,et al.  Response to Ticagrelor in Clopidogrel Nonresponders and Responders and Effect of Switching Therapies: The RESPOND Study , 2010, Circulation.

[10]  Masafumi Ueno,et al.  Basic principles of platelet biology and clinical implications. , 2010, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[11]  A. Shuldiner,et al.  The effect of elinogrel on high platelet reactivity during dual antiplatelet therapy and the relation to cyp 2c19*2 genotype: first experience in patients , 2010, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[12]  D. Kereiakes,et al.  Randomized Double-Blind Assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the Antiplatelet Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ONSET/OFFSET Study , 2009, Circulation.

[13]  Claes Held,et al.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  S. Heptinstall,et al.  The reversible P2Y12 antagonist cangrelor influences the ability of the active metabolites of clopidogrel and prasugrel to produce irreversible inhibition of platelet function , 2008, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[15]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  C. Macaya,et al.  Variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel: clinical implications, management, and future perspectives. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  R. Collins,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[18]  A. Skene,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  P. Williamson,et al.  Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. , 2004, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[20]  Eric J Topol,et al.  Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[21]  N. Toma Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease. The ONSET/OFFSET study. , 2010, Maedica.

[22]  S. Steinhubl,et al.  Transitioning patients from cangrelor to clopidogrel: pharmacodynamic evidence of a competitive effect. , 2008, Thrombosis research.

[23]  J. Samet,et al.  Food and Drug Administration , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  P. R. R. Ecurrent,et al.  EFFECTS OF CLOPIDOGREL IN ADDITION TO ASPIRIN IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION , 2001 .