Lost in a Universe of Markets: Toward a Theory of Market Scoping for Early-Stage Technologies

This article examines market scoping for early-stage technologies, a fundamental yet underexplored marketing activity. Market scoping refers to managerial activities directed at the identification of market spaces for early-stage technologies. This discovery-oriented research aimed at theory development draws on an extensive, multiyear database of email trails and archival records detailing market-scoping efforts for early-stage technologies emerging from a global research university. From this longitudinal database, the authors provide an in-depth examination of managers’ market space decisions and advance an initial theory of market scoping. They isolate managers’ market-scoping mindset—which manifests as market ambiguity avoidance or acceptance—as a key explanatory construct shaping market space decisions and outcomes. Market ambiguity avoidance results in managers’ downstream orientation toward end users; this mindset, counterintuitively, may lead to technology commercialization failure. In contrast, market ambiguity acceptance results in managers’ upstream orientation; this mindset directs attention away from end users but helps uncover indirect paths to viable market spaces. This article lays the groundwork for advancing marketing research in the context of early-stage technology commercialization.

[1]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market-driven versus driving markets , 2000 .

[2]  John C. Dencker,et al.  The effects of opportunities and founder experience on new firm performance , 2015 .

[3]  E. Rogers.  New Product Adoption and Diffusion , 1976 .

[4]  S. Budner.  Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[5]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[6]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[7]  G. Lynn,et al.  Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process , 1996 .

[8]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development , 1998 .

[9]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[10]  Michael Song,et al.  Marketing under Uncertainty: The Logic of an Effectual Approach , 2009 .

[11]  W. T. Chen,et al.  Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging , 2016, Science.

[12]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[13]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  S. Shane,et al.  Determinants of invention commercialization: an empirical examination of academically sourced inventions , 2007 .

[15]  Elkin Olaguer Pérez Sánchez,et al.  Measurement of potential absorption capacity in Colombia's innovative companies , 2017 .

[16]  S. Sarasvathy.  Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency , 2001 .

[17]  Jing Dong,et al.  Managing Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty in Startup Companies: An Empirical Study , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[18]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[19]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[20]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Marketing Doctrine: A Principles-Based Approach to Guiding Marketing Decision Making in Firms , 2014 .

[21]  Israel M. Kirzner.  Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach , 1997 .

[22]  R. Rust,et al.  Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications , 1994 .

[23]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE LEVERAGING , 2007 .

[25]  Scott Shane,et al.  The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[26]  S. Shane.  Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[27]  Ivano Cardinale.  Beyond Constraining and Enabling: Toward New Microfoundations for Institutional Theory , 2017 .

[28]  Keith Warfield,et al.  Technology readiness levels , 2016 .

[29]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[30]  Rajesh K. Chandy,et al.  From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development , 2006 .

[31]  R. Chandy,et al.  Managing the Future: CEO Attention and Innovation Outcomes , 2007 .

[32]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[33]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[34]  G. O'Connor.  Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects , 1998 .

[35]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Friends, Businesspeople, and Relationship Roles: A Conceptual Framework and a Research Agenda , 2006 .

[36]  Marco S. Giarratana,et al.  General technological capabilities, product market fragmentation, and markets for technology , 2013 .

[37]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[38]  Mark P. Rice,et al.  New Market Creation for Breakthrough Innovations: Enabling and Constraining Mechanisms , 2013 .

[39]  M. Yadav.  The Decline of Conceptual Articles and Implications for Knowledge Development , 2010 .

[40]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[41]  Se-Jun Park.  Understanding Technology Transfer , 1999 .

[42]  N. Capon,et al.  Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment , 1987 .

[43]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Escaping the Prior Knowledge Corridor: What Shapes the Number and Variety of Market Opportunities Identified Before Market Entry of Technology Start-ups? , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  Market Vision and Market Visioning Competence: Impact on Early Performance for Radically-New, High-Tech Products , 2010 .

[45]  Ashlee Humphreys.  Megamarketing: The Creation of Markets as a Social Process , 2010 .

[46]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Scripts in Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[47]  Andrea Fosfuri.  The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[48]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Constructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields , 2009 .

[49]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[50]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Functions of Parting CEremonies in Dying Organizations , 1986 .

[51]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firms , 2015 .

[52]  W. Reinartz,et al.  Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully , 2011 .

[53]  Nicole Coviello,et al.  Creating Major Innovations with Customers: Insights from Small and Young Technology Firms , 2012 .

[54]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[55]  Philip Anderson,et al.  Forming and Exploiting Opportunities: The Implications of Discovery and Creation Processes for Entrepreneurial and Organizational Research , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Marc Gruber,et al.  Look Before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[57]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[58]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[59]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .