On the Dielectric “Constant” of Proteins: Smooth Dielectric Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Its Implementation in DelPhi

Implicit methods for modeling protein electrostatics require dielectric properties of the system to be known, in particular, the value of the dielectric constant of protein. While numerous values of the internal protein dielectric constant were reported in the literature, still there is no consensus of what the optimal value is. Perhaps this is due to the fact that the protein dielectric constant is not a “constant” but is a complex function reflecting the properties of the protein’s structure and sequence. Here, we report an implementation of a Gaussian-based approach to deliver the dielectric constant distribution throughout the protein and surrounding water phase by utilizing the 3D structure of the corresponding macromolecule. In contrast to previous reports, we construct a smooth dielectric function throughout the space of the system to be modeled rather than just constructing a “Gaussian surface” or smoothing molecule–water boundary. Analysis on a large set of proteins shows that (a) the average dielectric constant inside the protein is relatively low, about 6–7, and reaches a value of about 20–30 at the protein’s surface, and (b) high average local dielectric constant values are associated with charged residues while low dielectric constant values are automatically assigned to the regions occupied by hydrophobic residues. In terms of energetics, a benchmarking test was carried out against the experimental pKa’s of 89 residues in staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) and showed that it results in a much better RMSD (= 1.77 pK) than the corresponding calculations done with a homogeneous high dielectric constant with an optimal value of 10 (RMSD = 2.43 pK).

[1]  Irwin D Kuntz,et al.  Estimation of Absolute Free Energies of Hydration Using Continuum Methods: Accuracy of Partial Charge Models and Optimization of Nonpolar Contributions , 2022 .

[2]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  J. Andrew Grant,et al.  A smooth permittivity function for Poisson–Boltzmann solvation methods , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  B. Honig,et al.  Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system: Solvation energies, binding energies, and conformational analysis , 1988, Proteins.

[5]  F. J. Luque,et al.  Protein flexibility and ligand recognition: challenges for molecular modeling. , 2011, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[6]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  A. Warshel,et al.  What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? , 2001, Proteins.

[8]  Jim Warwicker,et al.  pKa predictions with a coupled finite difference Poisson–Boltzmann and Debye–Hückel method , 2011, Proteins.

[9]  Chuan Li,et al.  Highly efficient and exact method for parallelization of grid‐based algorithms and its implementation in DelPhi , 2012, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  W. Im,et al.  Continuum solvation model: Computation of electrostatic forces from numerical solutions to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation , 1998 .

[11]  Samuel Genheden,et al.  Comparison of end‐point continuum‐solvation methods for the calculation of protein–ligand binding free energies , 2012, Proteins.

[12]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[13]  C. Castañeda,et al.  Molecular determinants of the pKa values of Asp and Glu residues in staphylococcal nuclease , 2009, Proteins.

[14]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Limitations of atom-centered dielectric functions in implicit solvent models. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[15]  Sarah L. Williams,et al.  Progress in the prediction of pKa values in proteins , 2011, Proteins.

[16]  Fabio Sterpone,et al.  Magnitude and molecular origin of water slowdown next to a protein. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  L. Kay,et al.  Protein dynamics and conformational disorder in molecular recognition , 2009, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[18]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[19]  Thomas Simonson Protein: ligand recognition: simple models for electrostatic effects. , 2013, Current pharmaceutical design.

[20]  David L Mobley,et al.  Small molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent: An extensive test of fixed-charge atomistic simulations. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[21]  Biman Bagchi,et al.  Anomalous dielectric relaxation of water molecules at the surface of an aqueous micelle. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[22]  M. Gilson,et al.  Prediction of pH-dependent properties of proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  A. Warshel,et al.  Electrostatic effects in macromolecules: fundamental concepts and practical modeling. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[24]  Xueyu Song,et al.  An Inhomogeneous Model of Protein Dielectric Properties: Intrinsic Polarizabilities of Amino Acids , 2002 .

[25]  P. Kollman,et al.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[26]  A. Oleinikova,et al.  Thermodynamic properties of hydration water around solutes: effect of solute size and water-solute interaction. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[27]  Anthony Nicholls,et al.  Application of the Gaussian dielectric boundary in Zap to the prediction of protein pKa values , 2011, Proteins.

[28]  Hervé Minoux,et al.  An electrostatic basis for the stability of thermophilic proteins , 2004, Proteins.

[29]  T. Hynes,et al.  The crystal structure of staphylococcal nuclease refined at 1.7 Å resolution , 1991, Proteins.

[30]  Emily J Parker,et al.  Using a combination of computational and experimental techniques to understand the molecular basis for protein allostery. , 2012, Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology.

[31]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Modeling electrostatic effects in proteins. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  David L Mobley,et al.  Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[33]  Irwin D Kuntz,et al.  Free energy calculations for theophylline binding to an RNA aptamer: Comparison of MM-PBSA and thermodynamic integration methods. , 2003, Biopolymers.

[34]  Ernst-Walter Knapp,et al.  Electrostatic pKa computations in proteins: Role of internal cavities , 2011, Proteins.

[35]  Emil Alexov,et al.  On the electrostatic component of protein-protein binding free energy , 2008, PMC biophysics.

[36]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Water clusters in nonpolar cavities. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Assembly of allosteric macromolecular switches: lessons from PKA , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[39]  Lin Li,et al.  DelPhi: a comprehensive suite for DelPhi software and associated resources , 2012, BMC biophysics.

[40]  A. Karshikoff,et al.  A model of a local dielectric constant in proteins , 1998 .

[41]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Effective approach for calculations of absolute stability of proteins using focused dielectric constants , 2009, Proteins.

[42]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Water in the polar and nonpolar cavities of the protein interleukin-1β. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[43]  Barry Honig,et al.  Extending the Applicability of the Nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann Equation: Multiple Dielectric Constants and Multivalent Ions† , 2001 .

[44]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Poisson-Boltzmann Calculations: van der Waals or Molecular Surface? , 2013, Communications in computational physics.

[45]  B. García-Moreno E.,et al.  High tolerance for ionizable residues in the hydrophobic interior of proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  B. García-Moreno E.,et al.  Large shifts in pKa values of lysine residues buried inside a protein , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Lisa Yan,et al.  A fast and accurate computational approach to protein ionization , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  The barrier for proton transport in aquaporins as a challenge for electrostatic models: The role of protein relaxation in mutational calculations , 2006, Proteins.

[49]  E. Alexov,et al.  Calculated protein and proton motions coupled to electron transfer: electron transfer from QA- to QB in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[50]  Jose M. Sanchez-Ruiz,et al.  Modulation of buried ionizable groups in proteins with engineered surface charge. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[51]  M. Gunner,et al.  MCCE analysis of the pKas of introduced buried acids and bases in staphylococcal nuclease , 2011, Proteins.

[52]  D. Pérahia,et al.  Polar fluctuations in proteins: molecular-dynamic studies of cytochrome c in aqueous solution. , 1996, Faraday discussions.

[53]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Using DelPhi capabilities to mimic protein's conformational reorganization with amino acid specific dielectric constants. , 2013, Communications in computational physics.

[54]  Jesús Jiménez-Barbero,et al.  Serine versus threonine glycosylation: the methyl group causes a drastic alteration on the carbohydrate orientation and on the surrounding water shell. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[55]  A. Warshel,et al.  The effect of protein relaxation on charge-charge interactions and dielectric constants of proteins. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[56]  J. Nielsen,et al.  The pKa Cooperative: A collaborative effort to advance structure‐based calculations of pKa values and electrostatic effects in proteins , 2011, Proteins.

[57]  D. Pérahia,et al.  Internal and interfacial dielectric properties of cytochrome c from molecular dynamics in aqueous solution. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.