Control of NTMs by ECCD on ASDEX Upgrade in view of ITER application

The predictions of the generalised Rutherford equation for the stabilisation of neoclassical tearing modes (NTMs) are reviewed. They suggest that the stabilisation efficiency can be maximised by maximising the current density within the island, favouring narrow deposition over maximum total current. Also, for ITER, where it is expected that the minimum island size before stabilisation will be small with respect to the deposition width, a loss of efficiency for continuous injection is predicted, but can be recovered by phased injection with respect to the island's O-point. The paper compares in detail these predictions with dedicated experiments on ASDEX Upgrade and finds good qualitative agreement with the generalised Rutherford equation. For quantitative agreement, the experimental database is not yet firm enough. The conclusion for ITER is that JECCD should be optimised and that modulation capability of the gyrotrons should be foreseen to ensure optimum stabilisation efficiency in the small island regime.

[1]  A. Pletzer,et al.  Stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes using a continuous localized current drive , 1999 .

[2]  K. Kajiwara,et al.  Complete stabilization of a tearing mode in steady state high-βp H-mode discharges by the first harmonic electron cyclotron heating/current drive on JT-60U , 2000 .

[3]  H. Zohm,et al.  Cross–machine benchmarking for ITER of neoclassical tearing mode stabilization by electron cyclotron current drive , 2006 .

[4]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Beta limits in long-pulse tokamak discharges , 1997 .

[5]  G. Gantenbein,et al.  Control of MHD instabilities by ECCD: ASDEX Upgrade results and implications for ITER , 2007 .

[6]  James D. Callen,et al.  On the stabilization of neoclassical magnetohydrodynamic tearing modes using localized current drive or heating , 1997 .

[7]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  CONTROL OF NEOCLASSICAL TEARING MODES IN DIII-D , 2001 .

[8]  John L. Johnson,et al.  Resistive instabilities in general toroidal plasma configurations , 1975 .

[9]  G. Gantenbein,et al.  Experiments on neoclassical tearing mode stabilization by ECCD in ASDEX Upgrade , 1999 .

[10]  S. D. Pinches,et al.  Reduction of the ion drive and ρ*θ scaling of the neoclassical tearing mode , 2002 .

[11]  Gunter,et al.  Complete suppression of neoclassical tearing modes with current drive at the electron-cyclotron-resonance frequency in ASDEX upgrade tokamak , 2000, Physical review letters.

[12]  H. Zohm,et al.  ß scaling for the onset of neoclassical tearing modes at ASDEX Upgrade , 1998 .

[13]  F. Leuterer,et al.  Enhancement of the stabilization efficiency of a neoclassical magnetic island by modulated electron cyclotron current drive in the ASDEX upgrade tokamak. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[14]  Xavier Garbet,et al.  Curvature effects on the dynamics of tearing modes in tokamaks , 2001 .

[15]  E. Poli,et al.  Comparison of the performance of different options for the ITER ECRH Upper Launcher , 2005 .

[16]  H. Zohm,et al.  Fitting of the Rutherford equation for Neoclassical Tearing Mode Stabilisation in ASDEX Upgrade , 2005 .

[17]  H. R. Wilson,et al.  Threshold for neoclassical magnetic islands in a low collision frequency tokamak , 1996 .

[18]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Helical temperature perturbations associated with tearing modes in tokamak plasmas , 1995 .

[19]  E. J. Strait,et al.  MHD limits to tokamak operation and their control , 2003 .