Estimating the number of contributors to two-, three-, and four-person mixtures containing DNA in high template and low template amounts

Aim To develop guidelines to estimate the number of contributors to two-, three-, and four-person mixtures containing either high template DNA (HT-DNA) or low template DNA (LT-DNA) amounts. Methods Seven hundred and twenty-eight purposeful two-, three-, and four-person mixtures composed of 85 individuals of various ethnicities with template amounts ranging from 10 to 500 pg were examined. The number of alleles labeled at each locus and the number of labeled different and repeating alleles at each locus as well over all loci for 2 HT-DNA or 3 LT-DNA replicates were determined. Guidelines based on these data were then evaluated with 117 mixtures generated from items handled by known individuals. Results The number of different alleles over all loci and replicates was used to initially categorize mixtures. Ranges were established based on the averages plus and minus 2 standard deviations, and to encompass all observations, the maximum and the minimum values. To differentiate samples that could be classified in more than one grouping, the number of loci with 4 or more repeating or different alleles, which were specific to three- and four-person mixtures, were verified. Misclassified samples showed an extraordinary amount of allele sharing or stutter. Conclusions These guidelines proved to be useful tools to distinguish low template and high template two-, three-, and four-person mixtures. Due to the inherent higher probability of allele sharing, four-person mixtures were more challenging. Because of allelic drop-out, this was also the case for samples with very low amounts of template DNA or extreme mixture ratios.

[1]  P Gill,et al.  Application of low copy number DNA profiling. , 2001, Croatian medical journal.

[2]  John Buckleton,et al.  Interpreting low template DNA profiles. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  R. Shaler,et al.  Maximization of STR DNA typing success for touched objects , 2006 .

[5]  Bruce S. Weir,et al.  DNA statistics in the Simpson matter , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[6]  T. Egeland,et al.  Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile , 2003, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[7]  M W Perlin,et al.  Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  M. P. Baur,et al.  Likelihood ratios for mixed stains when the number of donors cannot be agreed , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[9]  James Curran,et al.  LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[10]  Hinda Haned,et al.  Estimating the Number of Contributors to Forensic DNA Mixtures: Does Maximum Likelihood Perform Better Than Maximum Allele Count? , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  Phuvadol Thanakiatkrai,et al.  Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series , 2013 .

[12]  H Haned,et al.  The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  Carissa M Krane,et al.  Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[14]  J S Buckleton,et al.  Setting bounds for the likelihood ratio when multiple hypotheses are postulated. , 1998, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[15]  Ragne Kristin Farmen,et al.  Assessment of individual shedder status and implication for secondary DNA transfer , 2008 .

[16]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Mixture Interpretation: Defining the Relevant Features for Guidelines for the Assessment of Mixed DNA Profiles in Forensic Casework * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[17]  J Buckleton,et al.  An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[18]  Peter Gill,et al.  Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains. , 2007, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[19]  J A Lambert,et al.  Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[20]  A. Kloosterman,et al.  Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number DNA samples by multiplex PCR of STR loci , 2003 .

[21]  Eric Buel,et al.  Development of an Alu-based, real-time PCR method for quantitation of human DNA in forensic samples. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[22]  Madhuri S. Mulekar,et al.  Weight-of Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles , 2008, Technometrics.