The attachment strategy of English ivy: a complex mechanism acting on several hierarchical levels

English ivy (Hedera helix L.) is able to grow on vertical substrates such as trees, rocks and house plaster, thereby attaching so firmly to the surface that when removed by force typically whole pieces of the climbing substrate are torn off. The structural details of the attachment process are not yet entirely understood. We studied the attachment process of English ivy in detail and suggest a four-phase process to describe the attachment strategy: (i) initial physical contact, (ii) form closure of the root with the substrate, (iii) chemical adhesion, and (iv) shape changes of the root hairs and form-closure with the substrate. These four phases and their variations play an important role in the attachment to differently structured surfaces. We demonstrate that, in English ivy, different mechanisms work together to allow the plant's attachment to various climbing substrates and reveal the importance of micro-fibril orientation in the root hairs for the attachment based on structural changes at the subcellular level.

[1]  S. Gorb,et al.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Plants control the properties and actuation of their organs through the orientation of cellulose fibrils in their cell walls. , 2009, Integrative and comparative biology.

[3]  J. Waite.  Mussel power. , 2008, Nature materials.

[4]  C. Rogler,et al.  Phase Change in Hedera helix: Stabilization of the Mature Form with Abscisic Acid and Growth Retardants , 1975 .

[5]  T. Rost,et al.  Development of the adhesive pad on climbing fig (Ficus pumila) stems from clusters of adventitious roots , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[6]  Ingo Burgert,et al.  Exploring the micromechanical design of plant cell walls. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[7]  M. Galway.  Root hair cell walls: filling in the frameworkThis review is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue on Plant Cell Biology. , 2006 .

[8]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Cellulose fibrils direct plant organ movements. , 2008, Faraday discussions.

[9]  L. Donaldson.  Microfibril Angle: Measurement, Variation and Relationships – A Review , 2008 .

[10]  W. Barnes,et al.  Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  F. Delmas,et al.  Saponins of the Ivy Plant, Hedera helix, and their Leishmanicidic Activity , 1991, Planta medica.

[12]  S. Gorb,et al.  Structures in the cell wall that enable hygroscopic movement of wheat awns. , 2008, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  Tensile and compressive stresses in tracheids are induced by swelling based on geometrical constraints of the wood cell , 2007, Planta.

[14]  A. Emons,et al.  Winding threads around plant cells Applications of the geometrical model for microfibril deposition , 1994, Protoplasma.

[15]  Ingo Burgert,et al.  Cell wall features with regard to mechanical performance. A review COST Action E35 2004–2008: Wood machining – micromechanics and fracture , 2009 .

[16]  A. Bowling,et al.  Gelatinous fibers are widespread in coiling tendrils and twining vines. , 2009, American journal of botany.

[17]  Stephen M. Shaler,et al.  Mechanical Properties Of Individual Southern Pine Fibers. Part II. Comparison Of Earlywood And Latewood Fibers With Respect To Tree Height And Juvenility , 2002 .

[18]  W. Oberhuber,et al.  Photoinhibition of photosynthesis under natural conditions in ivy (Hedera helix L.) growing in an understory of deciduous trees , 1991, Planta.

[19]  David A. Waugh,et al.  Ontogenetic Variations in Cuticle Morphology in the Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, 1896 , 2009 .

[20]  R. Elbaum,et al.  The Role of Wheat Awns in the Seed Dispersal Unit , 2007, Science.

[21]  Mingjun Zhang,et al.  Nanoparticles secreted from ivy rootlets for surface climbing. , 2008, Nano letters.

[22]  Adam P Summers,et al.  Biomaterials: Silk-like secretion from tarantula feet , 2006, Nature.

[23]  C. Dawson,et al.  How pine cones open , 1997, Nature.

[24]  K. Vaughn,et al.  A cortical band of gelatinous fibers causes the coiling of redvine tendrils: a model based upon cytochemical and immunocytochemical studies , 2006, Planta.

[25]  F. Roberto,et al.  Understanding Marine Mussel Adhesion , 2007, Marine Biotechnology.

[26]  S. Gorb.  Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[27]  Gordon C. Tucker.  Hedera helix L. , 2003 .

[28]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Quantifying the attachment strength of climbing plants: a new approach. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[29]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[30]  C. Neinhuis,et al.  Methanol as a rapid fixative for the investigation of plant surfaces by SEM , 1996 .

[31]  Daniel J. Metcalfe,et al.  Hedera helix L. , 2005 .

[32]  M. Doble,et al.  Understanding the structure of the adhesive plaque of Amphibalanus reticulatus , 2010 .

[33]  C. Darwin.  The Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants , 1875, Nature.

[34]  A. Bowling,et al.  Structural and immunocytochemical characterization of the adhesive tendril of Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia [L.] Planch.) , 2008, Protoplasma.

[35]  A. G. Endress,et al.  Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies on the developing adhesive disc of Boston Ivy tendrils , 1976, Protoplasma.

[36]  W. Tremel,et al.  Influence of Binding‐Site Density in Wet Bioadhesion , 2008 .

[37]  A. G. Endress,et al.  Adhesion of the Boston ivy tendril , 1977 .

[38]  X. Qin,et al.  Extensible collagen in mussel byssus: a natural block copolymer. , 1997, Science.