A Volumetric Assessment Using Computed Tomography of Canine and First Molar Roots in Dogs of Varying Weight

Mandibular volume and tooth root volumes were shown to increase at different rates at locations containing the roots of the canine (C) and mesial and distal roots of the first molar (M1). Thirty-six dogs were included in this study. Data were generated using computed tomography at locations of the mandible involving the roots of the C and M1 teeth. Software was used to trace the external surface of the mandible, calculating the volume of the mandible at each location. Similar techniques were used to trace and calculate the volume of the C and M1 roots. Mandible volume, tooth root volume, and root percentage of mandible volume were analyzed and compared using the slopes of the best fit line. At the M1 mesial and distal roots, mandible volume (P < .001) and root volume (P < .001) were both noted to increase, with increasing weight at different rates. The rate of change in the root percentage by weight of M1 roots was not different (P = .214). Each location demonstrated a different increasing rate of change for mandibular volume and increasing root volume. Results show that as patient’s weight increases, the mandible and root volumes increase at different rates. Root percentage by volume at all three locations was noted to decrease by the same rate. Canine and M1 roots are proportionally larger than the supporting mandibular bone in smaller patients. Care should be taken to recommend periodontal disease prevention for owners of small dogs and consideration made when performing extractions or other surgery that may destabilize the mandible.

[1]  S. Stover,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of two plating configurations for critical-sized defects of the mandible in dogs. , 2016, American journal of veterinary research.

[2]  R. Drees,et al.  Caudal Mandibular Bone Height and Buccal Cortical Bone Thickness Measured by Computed Tomography in Healthy Dogs. , 2016, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[3]  Bill Gengler Exodontics: extraction of teeth in the dog and cat. , 2013, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[4]  H. de Rooster,et al.  A retrospective study of 109 dogs with mandibular fractures , 2012, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[5]  P. Noritomi,et al.  Finite Element Modeling for Development and Optimization of a Bone Plate for Mandibular Fracture in Dogs , 2010, Journal of veterinary dentistry.

[6]  L. Milella Complications resulting from or associated with extractions , 2010 .

[7]  M. Gioso,et al.  Oral Fractures in Dogs of Brazil — A Retrospective Study , 2005, Journal of veterinary dentistry.

[8]  F. Shofer,et al.  Mandible and Mandibular First Molar Tooth Measurements in Dogs: Relationship of Radiographic Height to Body Weight , 2001, Journal of veterinary dentistry.

[9]  Smith Mm Surgical extraction of the mandibular canine tooth in the dog. , 2001 .

[10]  M. Smith Surgical extraction of the mandibular canine tooth in the dog. , 2001, Journal of veterinary dentistry.

[11]  Smith Mm,et al.  Potential attachment area of the first mandibular molar in dogs. , 1992 .

[12]  M. Smith,et al.  Potential attachment area of the first mandibular molar in dogs. , 1992, American journal of veterinary research.

[13]  J. Yorty,et al.  Oral Surgery , 1874, The American journal of dental science.

[14]  J. Meningaud,et al.  [Maxillofacial surgery. I]. , 1969, Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Stomatologie.

[15]  J. Parada [Considerations for general anesthesia]. , 1954, Revista de la Asociacion Medica Argentina.