Channel Structure Design for Complementary Products under a Co-Opetitive Environment

In the high-tech industry, firms can be partners in one respect (e.g., resellers) and competitors in another. In this article, we investigate the channel structure problem for two firms-each selling competing products in two complementary markets—who are deciding whether to sell their products to customers directly or distribute one of them through a competitor. The customers are heterogeneous and both firms have products that are horizontally differentiated. When selling products directly, the firm can coordinate the prices of the two complementary products and avoid the inefficiency of double marginalization. However, selling (indirectly) through the competing manufacturer can mitigate competition because the competitor shares the profit of both competing products and therefore does not price its own products aggressively. One might expect that when the externality across the markets is strong, firms would prefer to sell both products directly (rather than through the competitor) in order to take advantage of the complementarity between markets and eliminate the inefficiency of double marginalization. Interestingly, we find that even though the first mover chooses to sell both products directly, the second mover forsakes the opportunity to coordinate the prices of its products and instead opts to distribute one of the products through the first mover.

[1]  Kyle D. Cattani,et al.  Seeking Closure: Competition in Complementary Markets , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[2]  R. Staelin,et al.  Vertical Strategic Interaction: Implications for Channel Pricing Strategy , 1997 .

[3]  J. Miguel Villas-Boas,et al.  Bertrand Supertraps , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Pradeep Chintagunta,et al.  Research Note - Sole Entrant, Co-optor, or Component Supplier: Optimal End-Product Strategies for Manufacturers of Proprietary Component Brands , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Jagmohan S. Raju,et al.  Positioning of Store Brands , 2002 .

[6]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Systems Competition, Vertical Merger, and Foreclosure , 2000 .

[7]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Effects of Brand Preference, Product Attributes, and Marketing Mix Variables in Technology Product Markets , 2006 .

[8]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[9]  Minakshi Trivedi,et al.  Distribution Channels: An Extension of Exclusive Retailership , 1998 .

[10]  David Simchi-Levi,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis , 2004 .

[11]  Oz Shy,et al.  A strategic approach to software protection , 1999 .

[12]  Hans Sebastian Heese,et al.  Supply chain interactions due to store-brand introductions: The impact of retail competition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  H. Sebastian Heese,et al.  The value of losing control: Competition in markets for complements , 2010 .

[14]  A. Tsay,et al.  Channel Conflict and Coordination in the E‐Commerce Age , 2004 .

[15]  J. Spengler Vertical Integration and Antitrust Policy , 1950, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Haresh Gurnani,et al.  Strategic Supply Chain Structure Design for a Proprietary Component Manufacturer , 2009 .