Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the DynaPort knee test

We present the rationale and design of the DynaPort knee test. The test aims at measuring knee patients' functional abilities in an unobtrusive, user-friendly way. Test persons wear several belts around their trunk and legs. The belts contain accelerometers, the signals of which are stored in a recorder, embedded in one of the belts. The knee test consists of a set of 29 tasks related to activities of daily life ("test items"). Accelerometer signals are analyzed in terms of 30 "movement features" (accelerations, angles, durations, frequencies, and some dimensionless numbers). In data analysis, the beginning and end of each test item is marked by hand; otherwise, analysis is automatic. We compared 140 knee patients with 32 healthy controls and found 541 of the 29×30=870 test item × movement feature combinations differed significantly between the two groups. From these 541 combinations the DynaPort knee score is calculated by the weighted averages of movement features per item, then weighted averages of items per cluster (locomotion, rising and descending, transfers, lifting and moving objects), and finally the average of the clusters. In an initial study the test-retest reliability of the knee test proved high, and the test turned out to be sufficiently responsive (0.7 patients' standard deviations improvement after 24 months). However, it remains difficult to interpret the scores in more meaningful terms than merely "better" or "worse." Extensive reliability studies in the future will further assess the validity of the test and provide more insight into the meaning of the scores. The DynaPort knee test may thus become an important instrument for evaluating patients' functional abilities in knee-related clinical practice and research.

[1]  S. Berven,et al.  Management and care of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: variations across different health care settings. , 2000, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[2]  Relman As,et al.  Assessment and accountability: the third revolution in medical care. , 1988 .

[3]  G. Stucki,et al.  A new look at the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index using Rasch analysis. , 1999, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[4]  P H Veltink,et al.  Detection of static and dynamic activities using uniaxial accelerometers. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  H. Hashimoto,et al.  Development of outcome research for total joint arthroplasty , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[6]  R. Bryan,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic condylar prosthesis. A ten-year follow-up study. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  N C Dunham,et al.  Measurement of Activities of Daily Living in Hospitalized Elderly: A Comparison of Self‐Report and Performance‐Based Methods , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  H J Busser,et al.  Method for objective assessment of physical work load at the workplace. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[10]  P Shekelle,et al.  Differences between Patients' and Physicians' Evaluations of Outcome after Total Hip Arthroplasty* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Robert S. Dittus,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life after Knee Replacement: Results of the Knee Replacement Patient Outcomes Research Team Study* , 1998 .

[12]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  P. Choong,et al.  Clinical pathways in hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study , 1999, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  A M Jette,et al.  Outcomes research: shifting the dominant research paradigm in physical therapy. , 1995, Physical therapy.

[15]  D Kromhout,et al.  Reproducibility of performance-based and self-reported measures of functional status. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[16]  D. Simonson,et al.  Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  C. Sledge,et al.  Kinematic total knee arthroplasty , 1999 .

[18]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. XII. How to use articles about health-related quality of life. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1997, JAMA.

[19]  C. Sledge,et al.  Kinematic total knee arthroplasty: a 10- to 14-year prospective follow-up review. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  L. Woodhouse,et al.  Functional ability perceived by individuals following total knee arthroplasty compared to age-matched individuals without knee disability. , 1998, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[21]  W. Ettinger,et al.  Assessing performance-related disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  A. Relman Assessment and Accountability: The Third Revolution in Medical Care , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[24]  L. Woodhouse,et al.  Physical impairments and functional limitations: a comparison of individuals 1 year after total knee arthroplasty with control subjects. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[25]  J Zuckerman,et al.  Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and length of stay: a nine-hospital study of surgical patients. , 2000, Medical care.

[26]  P. Beek,et al.  Pelvis-thorax coordination in the transverse plane during gait. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[27]  D. Watson,et al.  Health complaints, stress, and distress: exploring the central role of negative affectivity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[28]  M. Cross,et al.  Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis , 1999, The Medical journal of Australia.

[29]  C. Moran,et al.  Total knee replacement: the joint of the decade , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  James Le Fanu,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine , 1999 .

[31]  P J Holliday,et al.  Functional performance measures: are they superior to self-assessments? , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[32]  J. Höher,et al.  Does the Mode of Data Collection Change Results in a Subjective Knee Score? , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[33]  Patient's memory or repeated pain and function scores as index for major clinical change caused by knee replacement? , 1997, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.