Remote sensing in urban planning: Contributions towards ecologically sound policies?

Abstract Remote sensing has evolved to become a key tool for various fields of environmental analysis, thus actively informing policy across areas and domains. To evaluate the degree to which remote sensing is contributing to the science of ecologically-oriented urban planning, we carried out a systematic literature review using the SCOPUS database, searching for articles integrating knowledge in urban planning, remote sensing and ecology. We reviewed 186 articles, analysing various issues in urban environments worldwide. Key findings include that the level of integration between the three disciplines is limited, with only 12% of the papers fully integrating ecology, remote sensing and planning while 24% of the studies use specific methods from one domain only. The vast majority of studies is oriented towards contributing to the knowledge base or monitoring the impacts of existing policies. Few studies are directly policy relevant by either contributing to direct issues in planning and making specific design suggestions or evaluations. The accessibility of the scientific findings remains limited, as the majority of journal articles are not open access and proprietary software and data are frequently used. To overcome these issues, we suggest three future avenues for science as well as three potential entry points for remote sensing into applied urban planning. By doing so, remote sensing data could become a vital tool actively contributing to policies, civil engagement and concrete planning measures by providing independent and cost effective environmental analyses.

[1]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  The ecosystem services concept: a new Esperanto to facilitate participatory planning processes? , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  Gretchen Vogel Scientific publishing. Open access gains support; fees and journal quality deter submissions. , 2011, Science.

[3]  Deyong Yu,et al.  Ecological restoration planning based on connectivity in an urban area , 2012 .

[4]  Michael Dixon,et al.  Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .

[5]  Manuel Wolff,et al.  Urban growth and decline: Europe’s shrinking cities in a comparative perspective 1990–2010 , 2018 .

[6]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[7]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Spatial distribution of arable and abandoned land across former Soviet Union countries , 2018, Scientific Data.

[8]  Norbert Müller,et al.  URBIO: an introduction to the International Network in Urban Biodiversity and Design , 2011, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.

[9]  N. Coops,et al.  Satellites: Make Earth observations open access , 2014, Nature.

[10]  Angela Lausch,et al.  Urban land use intensity assessment: The potential of spatio-temporal spectral traits with remote sensing , 2018 .

[11]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research , 2014, Science.

[12]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Current status of Landsat program, science, and applications , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[13]  Bela Gipp,et al.  Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey , 2015, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[14]  A. Berg,et al.  Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution , 2018, Scientific Data.

[15]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Whose conservation? , 2014, Science.

[16]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Understanding and quantifying landscape structure – A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics , 2015 .

[17]  Dirk Pflugmacher,et al.  Green growth? On the relation between population density, land use and vegetation cover fractions in a city using a 30-years Landsat time series , 2020 .

[18]  Johannes Rosentreter,et al.  Towards large-scale mapping of local climate zones using multitemporal Sentinel 2 data and convolutional neural networks , 2020 .

[19]  D. Geneletti,et al.  A framework to explore the effects of urban planning decisions on regulating ecosystem services in cities , 2019, Ecosystem Services.

[20]  Jianping Wu,et al.  Toward automatic estimation of urban green volume using airborne LiDAR data and high resolution Remote Sensing images , 2013, Frontiers of Earth Science.

[21]  Zhongming Zheng,et al.  Multipurpose greenway planning for changing cities: A framework integrating priorities and a least-cost path model , 2011 .

[22]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Reconceptualising sustainability assessment , 2017 .

[23]  Erik Andersson,et al.  Neighbourhood character affects the spatial extent and magnitude of the functional footprint of urban green infrastructure , 2020, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  Adèle Paul-Hus,et al.  The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[25]  Hilde Tobi,et al.  Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework , 2017, Quality & Quantity.

[26]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Remote sensing and geospatial technologies in support of a normative land system science: status and prospects , 2019, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[27]  Stuart Batterman,et al.  Allergenic pollen production across a large city for common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) , 2019, Landscape and urban planning.

[28]  Ben Somers,et al.  Foliar optical traits indicate that sealed planting conditions negatively affect urban tree health , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[29]  G. Daily,et al.  Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions , 2015 .

[30]  Adam T. Ford,et al.  Aeroconservation for the Fragmented Skies , 2017 .

[31]  Christian Wolter,et al.  Aerial survey and spatial analysis of sources of light pollution in Berlin, Germany , 2012 .

[32]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Erik Andersson,et al.  Advancing urban green infrastructure in Europe: Outcomes and reflections from the GREEN SURGE project , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[34]  Tobia Lakes,et al.  The urban environmental indicator “Biotope Area Ratio”—An enhanced approach to assess and manage the urban ecosystem services using high resolution remote-sensing , 2012 .

[35]  S. Dessai,et al.  Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science , 2013 .

[36]  T. Fung,et al.  Ecotourism planning using multiple criteria evaluation with GIS , 2007 .

[37]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[38]  S. Goetz,et al.  Using the Sleuth Urban Growth Model to Simulate the Impacts of Future Policy Scenarios on Urban Land Use in the Baltimore-Washington Metropolitan Area , 2004 .

[39]  Marit L. Wilkerson,et al.  The seven lamps of planning for biodiversity in the city , 2018, Cities.

[40]  Guy Barnett,et al.  Understanding the potential loss and inequities of green space distribution with urban densification , 2015 .

[41]  Raffaele Lafortezza,et al.  Combining high-resolution images and LiDAR data to model ecosystem services perception in compact urban systems , 2017, Ecological Indicators.

[42]  Denisa Rodila,et al.  GEOEssential – mainstreaming workflows from data sources to environment policy indicators with essential variables , 2019, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[43]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning , 2011 .

[44]  Roland Kraemer,et al.  Ecosystem services of allotment and community gardens: A Leipzig, Germany case study , 2017 .

[45]  Jari Niemelä,et al.  Ecology and urban planning , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[46]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[47]  Sung-Kwon Hong,et al.  Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas , 2008 .

[48]  Yuanman Hu,et al.  Effects of urbanization on direct runoff characteristics in urban functional zones. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[49]  Dexter H. Locke,et al.  Urban environmental stewardship and changes in vegetative cover and building footprint in New York City neighborhoods (2000–2010) , 2014, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[50]  Gregory Giuliani,et al.  Lifting the Information Barriers to Address Sustainability Challenges with Data from Physical Geography and Earth Observation , 2017 .

[51]  D. Geneletti,et al.  Ecosystem services in urban plans: What is there, and what is still needed for better decisions , 2018 .

[52]  Scott B. Bell,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment Framework for Landscape-Based, Temporal Analysis of Wetland Change in Urban Environments , 2016, Environmental Management.

[53]  Wataru Fukui,et al.  Fine-scale characterization of bird habitat using airborne LiDAR in an urban park in Japan , 2016 .

[54]  W. McDowell,et al.  The next generation of site-based long-term ecological monitoring: Linking essential biodiversity variables and ecosystem integrity. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[55]  Clemens Jänicke,et al.  Front and back yard green analysis with subpixel vegetation fractions from earth observation data in a city , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[56]  A. Troy,et al.  Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[57]  Hong S. He,et al.  Effects of spatial pattern of greenspace on urban cooling in a large metropolitan area of eastern China , 2014 .

[58]  Xiao Feng,et al.  Open Science principles for accelerating trait-based science across the Tree of Life , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[59]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  Advancing Urban Ecology toward a Science of Cities , 2016 .

[60]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Understanding an urbanizing planet: Strategic directions for remote sensing , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[61]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  The impact of land development regulation on residential tree cover: An empirical evaluation using high-resolution IKONOS imagery , 2010 .

[62]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Geo-Wiki: An online platform for improving global land cover , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[64]  Chen Cheng,et al.  A climatic environmental performance assessment method for ecological city construction: Application to Beijing Yanqi Lake , 2015 .

[65]  Joan Masó-Pau,et al.  Earth observations for sustainable development goals monitoring based on essential variables and driver-pressure-state-impact-response indicators , 2019, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[66]  A. Okujeni,et al.  Imaging Spectroscopy of Urban Environments , 2018, Surveys in Geophysics.

[67]  M. Ridd Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities , 1995 .