Indicators of European public research in hydrogen and fuel cells—An input–output analysis

A prerequisite of any coordinated research activity is a comparison of the current status of research in the countries in question and a means to monitor the progress in particular sectors. Analysis of indicators of research in different countries allows comparison of the research undertaken. This paper compares input and output indicators of public research in hydrogen and fuel cells (H&FC) both within Europe and between Europe and the US, Japan and China. Overall the combined public H&FC research budget for the EU25 countries, associated states and accession countries was £276M in 2005, slightly higher than in the US, but lower than in Japan. An analysis of research outputs indicates that European competitive advantage is being lost to China and the US. Greater and more effective research coordination as well as more targeted allocation of research funds are proposed as potential solutions.

[1]  P. S. Nagpaul.  Quasi-quantitative measures of research performance: An assessment of construct validity and reliability , 1995, Scientometrics.

[2]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies , 2005, Scientometrics.

[3]  Benedetto Lepori.  Methodologies for the analysis of research funding and expenditure: from input to positioning indicators , 2006 .

[4]  William E. Souder,et al.  Measuring R&D Performance-State of the Art , 1997 .

[5]  Benoît Godin,et al.  The emergence of S&T indicators: why did governments supplement statistics with indicators? , 2003 .

[6]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[7]  Stian Nygaard,et al.  System failure, innovation policy and patents : Fuel cells and related hydrogen technology in Norway 1990-2002 , 2006 .

[8]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A global survey of hydrogen energy research, development and policy , 2006 .

[9]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Assessment of Flemish R&D in the field of information technology: A bibliometric evaluation based on publication and patent data, combined with OECD research input statistics , 1998 .

[10]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance , 2001, Scientometrics.

[11]  K. Riahi,et al.  The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: a sustainable development scenario , 2003 .

[12]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The evolution of hydrogen research: Is Germany heading for an early lock-in? , 2005 .

[13]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Measuring Science: An Exploration , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .

[15]  Yongtae Park,et al.  On the Measurement of Patent Stock as Knowledge Indicators , 2006 .

[16]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  The scientific wealth of European nations: Taking effectiveness into account , 1998, Scientometrics.

[17]  H. Grupp,et al.  Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators? , 2004 .

[18]  Thorsten Teichert,et al.  Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis , 2005 .