Why Concatenation Fails Near the Anomaly Zone
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ziheng Yang,et al. Challenges in Species Tree Estimation Under the Multispecies Coalescent Model , 2016, Genetics.
[2] Matthew W. Hahn,et al. Gene tree discordance causes apparent substitution rate variation , 2015, bioRxiv.
[3] Claudia R. Solís-Lemus,et al. Inconsistency of Species Tree Methods under Gene Flow. , 2016, Systematic biology.
[4] Tandy Warnow,et al. Evaluating Summary Methods for Multilocus Species Tree Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Lineage Sorting. , 2016, Systematic biology.
[5] Vladimir N Minin,et al. Detecting the Anomaly Zone in Species Trees and Evidence for a Misleading Signal in Higher-Level Skink Phylogeny (Squamata: Scincidae). , 2016, Systematic biology.
[6] Daniel B. Sloan,et al. The effects of subsampling gene trees on coalescent methods applied to ancient divergences. , 2016, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[7] Matthew W. Hahn,et al. Phylogenomics Reveals Three Sources of Adaptive Variation during a Rapid Radiation , 2016, PLoS biology.
[8] Matthew W. Hahn,et al. Irrational exuberance for resolved species trees , 2016, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[9] James Mallet,et al. How reticulated are species? , 2015, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[10] Claudia R. Solís-Lemus,et al. Inferring Phylogenetic Networks with Maximum Pseudolikelihood under Incomplete Lineage Sorting , 2015, PLoS genetics.
[11] J. DaCosta,et al. ddRAD-seq phylogenetics based on nucleotide, indel, and presence-absence polymorphisms: Analyses of two avian genera with contrasting histories. , 2016, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[12] Scott V Edwards,et al. Implementing and testing the multispecies coalescent model: A valuable paradigm for phylogenomics. , 2016, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[13] J. Rhodes,et al. There are no caterpillars in a wicked forest. , 2015, Theoretical population biology.
[14] H. Ellegren,et al. The Dynamics of Incomplete Lineage Sorting across the Ancient Adaptive Radiation of Neoavian Birds , 2015, PLoS biology.
[15] Tandy Warnow,et al. On the Robustness to Gene Tree Estimation Error (or lack thereof) of Coalescent-Based Species Tree Methods. , 2015, Systematic biology.
[16] Tandy J. Warnow,et al. ASTRAL-II: coalescent-based species tree estimation with many hundreds of taxa and thousands of genes , 2015, Bioinform..
[17] Nicola De Maio,et al. PoMo: An Allele Frequency-Based Approach for Species Tree Estimation , 2015, bioRxiv.
[18] J. Bunge,et al. Consistency of a phylogenetic tree maximum likelihood estimator , 2015 .
[19] J. Sites,et al. Model-based approach to test hard polytomies in the Eulaemus clade of the most diverse South American lizard genus Liolaemus (Liolaemini, Squamata) , 2015 .
[20] David Stern,et al. Concatenation and Species Tree Methods Exhibit Statistically Indistinguishable Accuracy under a Range of Simulated Conditions , 2015, PLoS currents.
[21] M. Steel,et al. Likelihood-based tree reconstruction on a concatenation of aligned sequence data sets can be statistically inconsistent. , 2015, Theoretical population biology.
[22] Liang Tang,et al. Multilocus species tree analyses resolve the ancient radiation of the subtribe Zizaniinae (Poaceae). , 2015, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[23] Adam D. Leaché,et al. Phylogenomics of Phrynosomatid Lizards: Conflicting Signals from Sequence Capture versus Restriction Site Associated DNA Sequencing , 2015, Genome biology and evolution.
[24] J. G. Burleigh,et al. Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[25] Laura Kubatko,et al. Identifiability of the unrooted species tree topology under the coalescent model with time-reversible substitution processes, site-specific rate variation, and invariable sites. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.
[26] Andreas R. Pfenning,et al. Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation , 2014, Science.
[27] John Gatesy,et al. Phylogenetic analysis at deep timescales: unreliable gene trees, bypassed hidden support, and the coalescence/concatalescence conundrum. , 2014, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[28] Eric S. Lander,et al. The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in African cichlid fish , 2014, Nature.
[29] Mukul S. Bansal,et al. Most parsimonious reconciliation in the presence of gene duplication, loss, and deep coalescence using labeled coalescent trees , 2014, Genome research.
[30] Ziheng Yang,et al. The influence of gene flow on species tree estimation: a simulation study. , 2014, Systematic biology.
[31] L. Nakhleh,et al. Computational approaches to species phylogeny inference and gene tree reconciliation. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[32] B. O’Meara. Evolutionary Inferences from Phylogenies: A Review of Methods , 2012 .
[33] Hayley C. Lanier,et al. Is recombination a problem for species-tree analyses? , 2012, Systematic biology.
[34] Thomas Mailund,et al. Incomplete lineage sorting patterns among human, chimpanzee, and orangutan suggest recent orangutan speciation and widespread selection. , 2011, Genome research.
[35] Colin N. Dewey,et al. BUCKy: Gene tree/species tree reconciliation with Bayesian concordance analysis , 2010, Bioinform..
[36] A. Drummond,et al. Bayesian Inference of Species Trees from Multilocus Data , 2009, Molecular biology and evolution.
[37] Scott V Edwards,et al. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model , 2010, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[38] Colin N. Dewey,et al. Fine-Scale Phylogenetic Discordance across the House Mouse Genome , 2009, PLoS genetics.
[39] L. Knowles,et al. What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics? , 2009, Systematic biology.
[40] D. Pearl,et al. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. , 2009, Systematic biology.
[41] S. Edwards,et al. Phylogenetic analysis in the anomaly zone. , 2009, Systematic biology.
[42] Noah A Rosenberg,et al. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[43] S. Edwards. IS A NEW AND GENERAL THEORY OF MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS EMERGING? , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[44] Luay Nakhleh,et al. PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.
[45] Noah A Rosenberg,et al. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees: the case of five taxa. , 2008, Systematic biology.
[46] M. Telford. Phylogenomics , 2007, Current Biology.
[47] D. Pearl,et al. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[48] L. Kubatko,et al. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. , 2007, Systematic biology.
[49] B. Larget,et al. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[50] Alan M. Moses,et al. Widespread Discordance of Gene Trees with Species Tree in Drosophila: Evidence for Incomplete Lineage Sorting , 2006, PLoS genetics.
[51] N. Rosenberg,et al. Discordance of Species Trees with Their Most Likely Gene Trees , 2006, PLoS genetics.
[52] M. Rosenberg,et al. Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and phylogenetic inference. , 2006, Systematic biology.
[53] James H. Degnan,et al. GENE TREE DISTRIBUTIONS UNDER THE COALESCENT PROCESS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[54] Yoshio Tateno,et al. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[55] Bryan Kolaczkowski,et al. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous , 2004, Nature.
[56] David L. Swofford,et al. Are Guinea Pigs Rodents? The Importance of Adequate Models in Molecular Phylogenetics , 1997, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.
[57] H. Gee. Evolution: Ending incongruence , 2003, Nature.
[58] S. Carroll,et al. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies , 2003, Nature.
[59] Noah A Rosenberg,et al. The probability of topological concordance of gene trees and species trees. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.
[60] Richard R. Hudson,et al. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation , 2002, Bioinform..
[61] W. Murphy,et al. Resolution of the Early Placental Mammal Radiation Using Bayesian Phylogenetics , 2001, Science.
[62] J. S. Rogers,et al. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. , 2001, Systematic biology.
[63] J. Hein,et al. Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis. , 2000, Genetics.
[64] D Penny,et al. Parsimony, likelihood, and the role of models in molecular phylogenetics. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[65] D. Soltis,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology , 1999, Nature.
[66] R. Page,et al. How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data? , 1999, Systematic biology.
[67] W. Maddison. Gene Trees in Species Trees , 1997 .
[68] Andrew Rambaut,et al. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..
[69] J. Bull,et al. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[70] Roderic D. M. Page,et al. FORUM ON CONSENSUS, CONFIDENCE, AND "TOTAL EVIDENCE" , 1996 .
[71] Roderic D. M. Page,et al. ON CONSENSUS, CONFIDENCE, AND “TOTAL EVIDENCE” , 1996 .
[72] J. Huelsenbeck. Performance of Phylogenetic Methods in Simulation , 1995 .
[73] P. Lewis,et al. Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.
[74] M. Nei,et al. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.
[75] S. Tavaré,et al. Line-of-descent and genealogical processes, and their applications in population genetics models. , 1984, Theoretical population biology.
[76] F. Tajima. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. , 1983, Genetics.
[77] Richard R. Hudson,et al. TESTING THE CONSTANT‐RATE NEUTRAL ALLELE MODEL WITH PROTEIN SEQUENCE DATA , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[78] D. Robinson,et al. Comparison of phylogenetic trees , 1981 .
[79] J. Felsenstein. Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .
[80] T. Jukes. CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .
[81] L. Pauling,et al. Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. , 1965, Journal of theoretical biology.