Modelling learning & performance: a social networks perspective

Traditional models of learning using a sociological perspective include social learning, situated learning and models of connectivisim and self-efficacy. While these models explain how individuals learn in varying social dimensions, very few studies provide empirical validation of such models and extend them to include group learning and performance. In this exploratory study, we develop a theoretical model based on social learning and social network theories to understand how knowledge professionals engage in learning and performance, both as individuals and as groups. We investigate the association between egocentric network properties (structure, position and tie), 'content richness' in the social learning process and performance. Analysis from data collected using an online eLearning environment shows that rather than performance; social learning is influenced by properties of social network structure (density, inter-group and intra-network communication), relations (tie strength) and position (efficiency). Furthermore, individuals who communicate with others internal rather than external to the group show higher tendencies of social learning. The contribution of this study is therefore two-fold: a theoretical development of a social learning and networks based model for understanding learning and performance; and the construction of a novel metric called 'content richness' as a surrogate measure for social learning. In conclusion, a useful implication of the study is that the model fosters understanding social factors that influence learning and performance in the domain of learning analytics. It also begs the question of whether the relationship between social networks and performance is mediated or moderated by learning and whether assumptions of the model hold true in non-educational domains.

[1]  Cristina N. González-Caro,et al.  Towards an information filtering system in the Web integrating collaborative and content based techniques , 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE/LEOS 3rd International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices (IEEE Cat. No.03EX726).

[2]  L. Kohlberg,et al.  The Philosophy Of Moral Development , 1982 .

[3]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: a case study , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[5]  H. Simon,et al.  Situated Learning and Education1 , 1996 .

[6]  Kon Shing Kenneth Chung,et al.  Towards a social network model for understanding information and communication technology use for general practitioners in rural Australia , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[8]  M. Knowles The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy , 1970 .

[9]  F. Bell Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning , 2011 .

[10]  J. Peters Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication , 1999 .

[11]  Sue Bennett,et al.  Beyond the 'digital natives' debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  Les M. Lunce Simulations : Bringing the benefits of situated learning to the traditional classroom , 2006 .

[13]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[14]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Knowing what we know , 2001 .

[15]  Larry D. Rosen Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the Way They Learn. , 2010 .

[16]  François Chiocchio,et al.  Project Team Performance: A Study of Electronic Task and Coordination Communication , 2007 .

[17]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[18]  Daniel J. Brass Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[19]  Rita Kop,et al.  Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? , 2008 .

[20]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[21]  J. Bruner,et al.  On Knowing: Essays for the Left Hand. , 1965 .

[22]  A. Ravenscroft,et al.  Dialogue and Connectivism: A New Approach to Understanding and Promoting Dialogue-Rich Networked Learning , 2011 .

[23]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions. , 1993 .

[24]  Christine Greenhow Online social networks and learning , 2011 .

[25]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[27]  L. Kohlberg The Philosophy of Moral Development Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice , 1981 .

[28]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[29]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[30]  Annalise Friend Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn , 2010 .

[31]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[32]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  Are social networks technologically embedded?: How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[33]  Ajay Mehra The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science , 2005 .

[34]  Maria Chiara Pettenati,et al.  Social Networking Theories and Tools to Support Connectivist Learning Activities , 2007, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[35]  Yan Zhao,et al.  Visualization of Communication Patterns in Collaborative Innovation Networks - Analysis of Some W3C Working Groups , 2003, CIKM '03.

[36]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[37]  D. Dolinski,et al.  Social Influence , 2007 .

[38]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[39]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[40]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[42]  A. Maslow A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[43]  Kon Shing Kenneth Chung,et al.  Measuring Performance of Knowledge-Intensive Workgroups through Social Networks , 2009 .

[44]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Moral Judgement of the Child , 1977 .

[45]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[46]  H. Leavitt Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[47]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[48]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[50]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[51]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Exploring Multiplexity: Social Network Structures in a Computer-Supported Distance Learning Class , 2001, Inf. Soc..