Regularization using Monte Carlo simulation to make optimal beamformers robust to system perturbations.

Design of optimal beamformers that withstand system perturbations such as channel mismatch, sensor position error, and pointing error has been a key issue in real-world applications of arrays. This paper aims to characterize the array performance in relation to the random perturbations from a statistical perspective. In the synthesis stage, directivity index and front-to-back ratio are employed as the performance measures for beamformer optimization. Filter coefficients of the arrays are determined using the least-squares and convex optimization approaches using the preceding performance measures. Next, Monte Carlo sampling are conducted to simulate the stochastic system perturbations following either uniform distribution or normal distribution. Statistics including the sample mean, maximum, minimum, and the maximum likelihood (ML) of the preceding performance measures are calculated. Three regularization criteria based on max-mean, max-min, and max-ML of performance measures are proposed for choosing regularization parameters used in beamformer optimization. The max-mean criterion was found most useful to determine either a simple constant or a frequency-dependent regularization parameter. To validate the proposed methods, experiments of beam patterns and automatic speech recognition test were conducted for directional and diffuse noise suppression problems, where optimal beamformers designed with the regularization parameter selected by the preceding procedures were utilized.

[1]  Hervé Lebret Optimal beamforming via interior point methods , 1996, J. VLSI Signal Process..

[2]  Chin-Hui Lee,et al.  Automatic recognition of keywords in unconstrained speech using hidden Markov models , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[3]  Jian Li,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of the Standard Delay-and-Sum Beamformer and Array Calibration , 2009 .

[4]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Superdirective Beamforming Robust Against Microphone Mismatch , 2007, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[5]  Shefeng Yan,et al.  Time-Domain Implementation of Broadband Beamformer in Spherical Harmonics Domain , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[6]  N. Metropolis,et al.  The Monte Carlo method. , 1949 .

[7]  Shefeng Yan,et al.  Optimal array pattern synthesis for broadband arrays. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Guisheng Liao,et al.  Robust Capon beamformer under norm constraint , 2010, Signal Process..

[9]  Hermann Ney,et al.  The use of a one-stage dynamic programming algorithm for connected word recognition , 1984 .

[10]  M. Bai,et al.  Application of convex optimization to acoustical array signal processing , 2013 .

[11]  Shefeng Yan,et al.  Optimal Modal Beamforming for Spherical Microphone Arrays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[12]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Superdirective Beamforming Robust Against Microphone Mismatch , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[13]  Jian Li,et al.  Robust Capon beamforming , 2002, Conference Record of the Thirty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2002..

[14]  J. Capon High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis , 1969 .

[15]  Henry Cox,et al.  Practical supergain , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[16]  R. C. Williamson,et al.  Theory and design of broadband sensor arrays with frequency invariant far‐field beam patterns , 1995 .

[17]  Paolo Castellini,et al.  Acoustic beamforming: Analysis of uncertainty and metrological performances , 2008 .

[18]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Steerable frequency-invariant beamforming for arbitrary arrays , 2006 .

[19]  Jordan Cheer,et al.  Robustness and Regularization of Personal Audio Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[20]  Jian Li,et al.  Constant-beamwidth and constant-powerwidth wideband robust capon beamformers for acoustic imaging , 2004 .