Face recognition memory: The effects of exposure duration and encoding instruction

Two experiments test the effects of exposure duration and encoding instruction on the relative memory for five facial features. Participants viewed slides of Identi-kit faces and were later given a recognition test with same or changed versions of each face. Each changed test face involved a change in one facial feature: hair, eyes, chin, nose or mouth. In both experiments the upper-face features of hair and eyes were better recognized than the lower-face features of nose, mouth, and chin, as measured by false alarm rates. In Experiment 1, participants in the 20-second exposure duration condition remembered faces significantly better than participants in the 3-second exposure duration condition; however, memory for all five facial features improved at a similar rate with the increased duration. In Experiment 2, participants directed to use feature scanning encoding instructions remembered faces significantly better than participants following age judgement instructions; however, the size of the memory advantage for upper facial features was less with feature scanning instructions than with age judgement instructions. The results are discussed in terms of a quantitative difference in processing faces with longer exposure duration, versus a qualitative difference in processing faces with various encoding instructions. These results are related to conditions that affect the accuracy of eyewitness identification.

[1]  A. Baddeley,et al.  When face recognition fails. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[2]  K. Pezdek,et al.  Development differences in the role of detail in picture recognition memory. , 1982, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  K. Laughery,et al.  Recognition of human faces: effects of target exposure time, target position, pose position, and type of photograph. , 1971, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  D. Homa,et al.  Perceptibility of schematic face stimuli: Evidence for a perceptual Gestalt , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[5]  G. J. Walker-Smith,et al.  The effects of delay and exposure duration in a face recognition task , 1978 .

[6]  Eugene Winograd,et al.  Recognition memory for faces following nine different judgments , 1976 .

[7]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  On Training People to Recognize Faces , 1979 .

[8]  G. Bower,et al.  Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory , 1974 .

[9]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Feature saliency and recognition memory for schematic faces , 1971 .

[10]  Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al.  The effect of orienting tasks on recognition memory , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[11]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[12]  H. Ellis,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF THE USE OF THE PHOTO-FIT TECHNIQUE FOR RECALLING FACES* , 1975 .

[13]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Recognition of human faces from isolated facial features: A developmental study , 1966 .

[14]  A. Baddeley.  Domains of recollection. , 1982 .

[15]  B Tversky,et al.  Picture memory improves with longer on time and off time. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[16]  G. Loftus,et al.  Encoding and use of detail information in picture recognition. , 1979, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory.

[17]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  M. Potter.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[19]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[20]  S. Penrod,et al.  Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. , 1986 .

[21]  G. Davies,et al.  Face recall: an examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy. , 1982, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  S Hollander,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[23]  M. Matthews,et al.  Discrimination of Identikit constructions of faces: Evidence for a dual processing strategy , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Differential hemispheric processing of faces: Methodological considerations and reinterpretation. , 1981 .

[25]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[26]  Stuart J. Mckelviet.  The meaningfulness and meaning of schematic faces , 1973 .

[27]  Robert J. Baron,et al.  Mechanisms of Human Facial Recognition , 1981, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[28]  K. Laughery,et al.  Sketch artist and Identi-kit procedures for recalling faces. , 1980 .

[29]  S. McKelvie,et al.  The Role of Eyes and Mouth in the Memory of a Face. , 1976 .

[30]  J. H. Mueller,et al.  Orienting strategies at study and test in facial recognition. , 1980, The American journal of psychology.

[31]  J Stoeckert,et al.  Picture memory: recognizing added and deleted details. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.