Auditory-evoked potentials during coma: do they improve our prediction of awakening in comatose patients?

OBJECTIVE The mismatch negativity (MMN), an auditory event-related potential, has been identified as a good indicator of recovery of consciousness during coma. We explored the predictive value of the MMN and other auditory-evoked potentials including brainstem and middle-latency potentials for predicting awakening in comatose patients after cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock. MATERIALS AND METHODS Auditory brainstem, middle-latency (Pa wave), and event-related potentials (N100 and MMN waves) were recorded in 17 comatose patients and 9 surgical patients matched by age and coronary artery disease. Comatose patients were followed up daily to determine recovery of consciousness and classified as awakened and nonawakened. RESULTS Among the auditory-evoked potentials, the presence or absence of MMN best discriminated between patients who awakened or those who did not. Mismatch negativity was present during coma in all patients who awakened (7/7) and in 2 of those (2/10) who did not awaken. In patients who awakened and in whom MMN was detected, 3 of those awakened between 2 and 3 days and 4 between 9 and 21 days after evoked potential examination. All awakened patients had intact N100 waves and identifiable brainstem and middle-latency waves. In nonawakened patients, N100 and Pa waves were detected in 5 cases (50%) and brainstem waves in 9 (90%). CONCLUSIONS The MMN is a good predictor of awakening in comatose patients after cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock and can be measured days before awakening encouraging ongoing life support.

[1]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[2]  J. Guérit,et al.  ERPs obtained with the auditory oddball paradigm in coma and altered states of consciousness: clinical relationships, prognostic value, and origin of components , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Early somatosensory evoked potential grades in comatose traumatic brain injury patients predict cognitive and functional outcome* , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[4]  A. Uziel,et al.  Auditory brain-stem responses in comatose patients: relationship with brain-stem reflexes and levels of coma. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  C W Hess,et al.  Early prognosis in coma after cardiac arrest: a prospective clinical, electrophysiological, and biochemical study of 60 patients. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  B. Kotchoubey,et al.  Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event-related brain potentials: A meta-analysis , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  G. B. Young,et al.  Clinical practice. Neurologic prognosis after cardiac arrest. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  M. Holtkamp,et al.  Functional, cognitive and emotional long–term outcome of patients with ischemic stroke requiring mechanical ventilation , 2005, Journal of Neurology.

[9]  C. Fischer,et al.  Auditory early- and middle-latency evoked potentials in patients with quadrigeminal plate tumors. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[10]  Dominique Morlet,et al.  Mismatch Negativity and N100 in Comatose Patients , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[11]  G. B. Young,et al.  Practice Parameter: Prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review) , 2006, Neurology.

[12]  R. Homan,et al.  Cerebral location of international 10-20 system electrode placement. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  R. Rodriguez,et al.  Human Auditory Evoked Potentials in the Assessment of Brain Function During Major Cardiovascular Surgery , 2004, Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[14]  R. Geocadin,et al.  Predicting neurological outcome following cardiac arrest , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[15]  N. Cullen,et al.  Cognitive correlates with functional outcomes after anoxic brain injury: A case-controlled comparison with traumatic brain injury , 2011, Brain injury.

[16]  K. Kaga,et al.  Auditory short, middle, and long latency responses in acutely comatose patients , 1985, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  C. Fischer,et al.  Improved prediction of awakening or nonawakening from severe anoxic coma using tree-based classification analysis* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[18]  D Morlet,et al.  Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked potentials in comatose patients , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Sources of auditory brainstem responses revisited: Contribution by magnetoencephalography , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[20]  R. Näätänen.  The Mismatch Negativity: A Powerful Tool for Cognitive Neuroscience , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[21]  George Tomlinson,et al.  Is this patient dead, vegetative, or severely neurologically impaired? Assessing outcome for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. , 2004, JAMA.

[22]  R. Rodriguez,et al.  Long-lasting functional disabilities in patients who recover from coma after cardiac operations. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  A. Hillis,et al.  Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with neurologic complications after cardiac surgery. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[24]  J. Whyte,et al.  Prediction of functional outcomes after traumatic brain injury: a comparison of 2 measures of duration of unconsciousness. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  Dominique Morlet,et al.  Late auditory and event-related potentials can be useful to predict good functional outcome after coma. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Allan H. Ropper,et al.  Evoked potentials in clinical medicine (second of two parts). , 1982 .

[27]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.