Use of Perspective View Displays for Operational Tasks

Abstract : Research on when and how to use three-dimensional (3-D) perspective views on flat screens for military operational tasks such as air traffic control is confusing and contradictory. This report considers the basic qualities and capabilities of two-dimensional (2-D) and 3-D views. Two experiments were conducted. Because perspective views integrate all the dimensions, it was hypothesized that 3-D views are better for object understanding. In contrast, it was hypothesized that 2-D views are better for judging the relative position of objects because each dimension can be isolated. Participants viewed simple block shapes in 2-D or 3-D and either performed an object understanding task (e.g., identification, mental rotation) or a relative position task (e.g., directions and distances between objects). This report concludes that a 3-D perspective view was far superior to 2-D views for understanding the shape of the simple blocks, but 2-D views were better than 3-D views for comprehending the relative position of two objects.

[1]  Mark Lucente Interactive three-dimensional holographic displays: seeing the future in depth , 1997, COMG.

[2]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Two- and Three-Dimensional Displays for Aviation: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison , 1993 .

[3]  Mark Lasher,et al.  Improved Second-Generation 3-D Volumetric Display System. Revision 2 , 1998 .

[4]  H. D. Kribs,et al.  Cognitive and Behavioral Task Implications for Three-Dimensional Displays Used in Combat Information/Direction Centers , 1999 .

[5]  Tyler T Prevett,et al.  Exploring the dimensions of egocentricity in aircraft navigation displays , 1995 .

[6]  Bradley S. Boyer 3-D Weather Displays for Aircraft Cockpits. , 1994 .

[7]  Suzanne V. Bemis,et al.  Operator Performance as a Function of Type of Display: Conventional versus Perspective , 1988 .

[8]  Alan Frazer Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited , 2001 .

[9]  C D Wickens,et al.  Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: effects of frame of reference and dimensionality. , 1996, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[10]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Three-Dimensional Displays for Terrain and Weather Awareness in the National Airspace System , 1995 .

[11]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Perspective Traffic Display Format and Airline Pilot Traffic Avoidance , 1987 .

[12]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Display Formatting Techniques for Improving Situation Awareness in the Aircraft Cockpit , 1991 .

[13]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Free Flight Cockpit Displays of Traffic and Weather: Effects of Dimensionality and Data Base Integration , 1997 .

[14]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  When Users Want What's not Best for Them , 1995 .

[15]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Perspective versus Plan View Air Traffic Control Displays: Survey and Empirical Results , 1991 .