A philosophical analysis of the Hill criteria

The epidemiological literature contains an ongoing and diversified discussion of the Hill criteria. This article offers a philosophical analysis of the criteria, showing that the criteria are related to two different views of causality. The authors argue that the criteria of strength, specificity, consistency, experiment, and biological gradient are related to a probabilistic regularity view of causality, whereas the criteria of coherence, plausibility, and analogy are related to a generative view of causality. The criterion of temporality is not related to either view, but may in contrast be central in inferring direction from cause to effect. The authors illuminate the aim and limitations of the various criteria that need to be included when discussing them.

[1]  M. Parascandola,et al.  Causation in epidemiology , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[2]  Determinism versus stochasticism: in support of long coffee breaks , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[3]  M. Parascandola,et al.  Two approaches to etiology: the debate over smoking and lung cancer in the 1950s. , 2004, Endeavour.

[4]  R. Doll.  Proof of Causality: Deduction from Epidemiological Observation , 2002, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[5]  T. Byers,et al.  The role of epidemiology in determining when evidence is sufficient to support nutrition recommendations. Summary statement. , 1999, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[6]  M. Susser.  Causal Thinking in the Health Sciences: Concepts and Strategies in Epidemiology , 1973 .

[7]  A. Lilienfeld,et al.  Epidemiological methods and inferences in studies of non-infectious diseases. , 1957, Public health reports.

[8]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies. , 1981 .

[9]  J. Yerushalmy,et al.  On the methodology of investigations of etiologic factors in chronic diseases. , 1959, Journal of chronic diseases.

[10]  J. Montague,et al.  Philosophy in medicine. , 1951, Western journal of surgery, obstetrics, and gynecology.

[11]  Stig Andur Pedersen,et al.  Philosophy of Medicine , 1986 .

[12]  B. Gerstman.  Epidemiology Kept Simple: An Introduction to Classic and Modern Epidemiology , 1998 .

[13]  T. Troward.  Causes and conditions. , 1919 .

[14]  D. Freedman.  From Association to Causation via Regression , 1997 .

[15]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research: volume 1- The analysis of case-control studies , 1980 .

[16]  Judy Payne,et al.  Association and Causation , 2004 .

[17]  Guang Zeng,et al.  [Field epidemiology]. , 2004, Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi.

[18]  M. Norton,et al.  A Guide to Parallel Paragraph and Page References in Oxford University Press Editions of Hume's Enquiry concerning Human Understanding , 2002, Hume Studies.

[19]  Ian Matthews,et al.  Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine , 1999 .

[20]  N. E. Breslow.  Statistical Methods in Cancer Research , 1986 .

[21]  J. Earman,et al.  The Cement Of The Universe , 1974 .

[22]  D. Weed,et al.  Biologic plausibility in causal inference: current method and practice. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  C. Poole.  Causal values. , 2001, Epidemiology.

[24]  J. Olsen,et al.  What characterises a useful concept of causation in epidemiology? , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[25]  M Susser,et al.  What is a cause and how do we know one? A grammar for pragmatic epidemiology. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  C. Poole,et al.  Looking back on "causal thinking in the health sciences". , 2000, Annual review of public health.

[27]  Mark Woodward,et al.  Epidemiology: Study Design and Data Analysis , 1999 .

[28]  N. Breslow,et al.  The analysis of case-control studies , 1980 .

[29]  Noel S Weiss,et al.  Can the "specificity" of an association be rehabilitated as a basis for supporting a causal hypothesis? , 2002, Epidemiology.

[30]  A. B. Hill.  The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[31]  Edward M. Hundert,et al.  The Cement of the Universe , 1990 .

[32]  D. Weed,et al.  Methods in epidemiology and public health: does practice match theory? , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[33]  B. Macmahon,et al.  Epidemiology: Principles and Methods , 1970 .

[34]  A. Renton,et al.  Epidemiology and causation: a realist view. , 1994, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[35]  D. Weed.  On the logic of causal inference. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[36]  M. Parascandola.  Epidemiology: second-rate science? , 1998, Public health reports.

[37]  B. Macmahon,et al.  Epidemiology Principles and Methods (2nd edition) , 1997 .