AERIAL IMAGES AND LIDAR DATA FUSION FOR DISASTER CHANGE DETECTION

Abstract. Potential applications of airborne LiDAR for disaster monitoring include flood prediction and assessment, monitoring of the growth of volcanoes and assistance in the prediction of eruptions, assessment of crustal elevation changes due to earthquakes, and monitoring of structural damage after earthquakes. Change detection in buildings is an important task in the context of disaster monitoring, especially after earthquakes. Traditionally, change detection is usually done by using multi-temporal images through spectral analyses. This provides two-dimensional spectral information without including heights. This paper will describe the capability of aerial images and LiDAR data fusion for rapid change detection in elevations, and methods of assessment of damage in made-made structures. In order to detect and evaluate changes in buildings, LiDAR-derived DEMs and aerial images from two epochs were used, showing changes in urban buildings due to construction and demolition. The proposed modelling scheme comprises three steps, namely, data pre-processing, change detection, and validation. In the first step for data pre-processing, data registration was carried out based on the multi-source data. In the second step, changes were detected by combining change detection techniques such as image differencing (ID), principal components analysis (PCA), minimum noise fraction (MNF) and post-classification comparison (P-C) based on support vector machines (SVM), each of which performs differently, based on simple majority vote. In the third step and to meet the objectives, the detected changes were compared against reference data that was generated manually. The comparison is based on two criteria: overall accuracy; and commission and omission errors. The results showed that the average detection accuracies were: 78.9%, 81.4%, 82.7% and 82.8% for post-classification, image differencing, PCA and MNF respectively. On the other hand, the commission and omission errors of the results improved when the techniques were combined compared to the best single change detection method. The proposed combination of techniques gives a high accuracy of 92.2% for detection of changes in buildings. The results show that using LiDAR data in the detection process improves the accuracy of feature detection by 14.9% compared with using aerial photography alone.

[1]  V. Vapnik Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data , 2006 .

[2]  A. A. Nielsen,et al.  A method for unsupervised change detection and automatic radiometric normalization in multispectral data , 2011 .

[3]  C. Armenakisa,et al.  A comparative analysis of scanned maps and imagery for mapping applications , 2003 .

[4]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[5]  D. Girardeau-Montaut,et al.  CHANGE DETECTION ON POINTS CLOUD DATA ACQUIRED W ITH A GROUND LASER SCANNER , 2005 .

[6]  V. Walter OBJECT-BASED EVALUATION OF LIDAR AND MULTISPECTRAL DATA FOR AUTOMATIC CHANGE DETECTION IN GIS DATABASES , 2004 .

[7]  R. Reulke,et al.  Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2005 .

[8]  Brian Pilemann Olsen,et al.  Automated Change Detection for Updates of Digital Map Databases , 2003 .

[9]  Chris Clifton Change Detection in Overhead Imagery Using Neural Networks , 2004, Applied Intelligence.

[10]  Liang-Chien Chen,et al.  Detection of building changes from aerial images and light detection and ranging (LIDAR) data , 2010 .

[11]  Costas Armenakis,et al.  A comparative analysis of scanned maps and imagery for mapping applications , 2003 .

[12]  Franck Jung Detecting building changes from multitemporal aerial stereopairs , 2004 .

[13]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[14]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[15]  AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF CHANGES FROM LASER SCANNER AND AERIAL IMAGE DATA FOR UPDATING BUILDING MAPS , 2004 .

[16]  King Fahd,et al.  TEMPORAL CHANGES IN MANGROVE COVER BETWEEN 1972 AND 2001 ALONG THE SOUTH COAST OF THE ARABIAN GULF , 2010 .

[17]  Rafael Wiemker,et al.  Change detection with 1 m resolution satellite and aerial images , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[18]  Curtis E. Woodcock,et al.  Change detection using the Gramm-Schmidt transformation applied to mapping forest mortality , 1994 .

[19]  Markus Niederöst Automated update of building information in maps using medium-scale imagery (1:15000) , 2001 .

[20]  Christian Heipke,et al.  EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC ROAD EXTRACTION , 2007 .

[21]  H. Murakami,et al.  Change detection of buildings using an airborne laser scanner , 1999 .

[22]  T. Tadono,et al.  An Approach for Automatic Change Inference in High Resolution Satellite Images , 2011 .

[23]  Masashi Matsuoka,et al.  LIDAR-based change detection of buildings in dense urban areas , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[24]  I. Dowman,et al.  Building Extraction using Lidar DEMs and Ikonos Images , 2003 .

[25]  Volker Walter,et al.  Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection , 2004 .